The statement from Facebook in your #5 tweet is a hamfisted, pitiful attempt at both-sidesism. I am not aware of the reach of IGD and Crimthinc on the FB platform, but I suspect that Facebook is not their main avenue of outreach so I hope that ... 1/4
..the practical damage from this action will be minimally disruptive. However, it is an incredible slap in the face to these organizations, both of which have painstakingly grown themselves from standalone websites - and in Crimethinc's case from zines - and which have ... 2/4
a long history of supporting anti-authoritarian, anti-oppression grassroots political movements without regard to "violence". Furthermore, Facebook continues to harbor numerous white supremacist groups on their platform, and still... 3/4
3 years + 1 wk later, FB has never taken responsibility for Unite the Right event being planned & propagandized on their platform. It is nothing short of shameful for them to now sit in judgment of the same groups & people who stood up against white supremacist violence that day.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Epik breach has some security mistakes in it that are so damaging they take my breath away. But I guess this shouldn’t be surprising given Rob Monster’s approach to business. A thread.
Here’s the Epik CEO trying to hire Jack Corbin, aka Daniel McMahon, serial harasser, cyber stalker now sitting in jail.
Here’s him dragging Cloudflare and calling them a honeypot and saying they have bad security. Can’t make this stuff up folks.
It’s time to talk about what happens after de-platforming: Nick Fuentes lasted 5 days after being kicked off Twitter before creating a new account. It has a name mocking sexual assault, groyper avatar, advertises his show, and follows all his other briefly deplatformed orbiters.
De-platformed high status individuals lose their brand and follower count (1k vs 130k in his case) when they come back, but they almost always return shortly after the ban. (They are easily detectable, so why do the platforms let them back?)
Low status individuals can return AND retain their brand - this is when you see username1, username2, ad nauseum. They have to rebuild their followers, but that is straightforward since they had fewer than 1k accounts to begin with.
Finally - here's my accepted paper on the DLive video streaming service and how it's being used by far-right propagandists to earn money (Apr 2020-Jan 2021). Lots of data! Here are some of the largest cash-outs including some post-insurrection refunds arxiv.org/abs/2105.05929
Here is the network of streamers (pink) and donors (gray) - only showing donors who gave at least 10,000 lemons ($120) for visibility, otherwise too much data! You can read more about the different labels in the paper, but A is Groypers, B is MurderTheMedia, etc.
What we learn from the network diagram is that there are lots of separate communities with very little overlap - at least at the high dollar amounts - between them. The biggest donation recipients operate more as "stars" within their own separate fandoms or cliques.
LBRY is one of a new crop of "uncensorable" blockchain-based content hosting sites, unsurprisingly run by a libertarian tech bro. They recently launched a "Youtube killer" called Odysee & set about trying to attract fascists. Yet, they are having some struggles. Let's explore.
First, and most embarrassingly, Odysee is trying to act like they rolled their own livestreaming tech solution. Fact is, they seem to have just hired the programmer for Bitwave (goes by Dispatch/Xander) & are running all their livestreams through the Bitwave[.]tv infrastructure.
You may recall Bitwave as one of the sites that enabled GypsyCrusader (Paul Miller) to harass Omegle users w/ shocking, racist comments while dressed like The Joker - before his gun charges and arrest. Amazing partnership LBRY, wow.
One thing I do to wind down after a long day is open your public source code and check out what your programmer is up to. I de-obfuscate the code, run a few tests, then contact every company involved in the tech stack keeping you online. It’s up to them whether to let you persist
I document everything, send updates to people who are keeping up with all this, and thank everyone profusely who helps keep the internet safe from violence-inspiring, racist antisemites like you. Then I go to bed and do it again the next day.
Sometimes while I’m figuring out the tech you’re experimenting with that day, I see the digital traces of someone else doing the same thing as me and I imagine we kind of wave at each other. Shoutouts to all the people quietly doing the work.
I was just answering a survey with a question about how "Extremist actors use the internet and social media differently than the average user." Here are 6 ways I have observed far-right extremist actors behaving differently online:
1. Harassment of users. Harassment is a key entertainment activity for these people, and can be carried out both on a single platform AND between platforms (i.e. advertising on Telegram for a DLive channel that is livestreaming a Discord raid).
2. Development of specialized vocabulary and memes to spread hate and build camaraderie. Specialized vocab also can be used to skirt content moderation ("joggers", "big luau", etc.) See also Daily Stormer style guide for more examples of how to propagandize via word choice/ tone.