Thread by @tvaziri

"Mission: Impossible - Fallout" (2018), cinematography by Rob Hardy

This shot is compelling on many levels. It takes its time, its classic composition, its deliberate moves mirror the emotional journey of Ethan and Ilsa's relationship. But you don't have to be a film scholar to *feel* that something special is going on here.

Currently cameras can not see detail inside of dark shadows and also decode super-hot surfaces hit with sunlight simultaneously. It's most obvious when the camera moves from interior [dark] to exterior [bright] (or vice versa).

https://twitter.com/tvaziri/status/1305229775867265024

There are a lot of great examples in the above thread, the most glaring is this one from "It's Kind of a Funny Story" (2010), where you can feel the camera operator irising down (reducing the amount of light hitting the sensor/film gate) just after camera goes through the door.

This exposure rack can be done in-camera, but it takes careful choreography & lots of rehearsal. One can also choose to do this kind of exposure rack in the color timing session. This was true in the photochemical days as well, but we have a LOT more precision in the digital era.

Also, in the digital era, you can choose to recolor/re-expose *certain* areas of the frame with great flexibility.

What does all this have to do with that "Fallout" shot?

Without animating anything, there is no way for the camera to properly expose for the deep dark shadows inside the tree tunnel *and* to be able to clearly see anything in the bright daylight. Rather than doing an in-camera exposure rack during filming...

The filmmakers chose to do the work in color timing/digital intermediate stage using the foreground tree as a convenient place to hide a soft matte transitioning between two different exposure settings.

A comparison of an early and later frame from the shot.