Did the early Church recognize a papacy? See for yourself. A collection of quotes from early Christians and Church Fathers recognizing the primacy of Peter among the apostles (thread):
Clement of Alexandria (200 A.D.): “[Peter is] the chosen, the preeminent, the first among the disciples, for whom alone with himself the Savior paid the tribute."
Tertullian (211): "[R]emember that the Lord left the keys of it to Peter here, and through him to the Church, which keys everyone will carry with him if he has been questioned and made a confession [of faith]."
Letter of Clement to James (221): "“Be it known to you, my lord, that Simon [Peter], who, for the sake of the true faith, and the most sure foundation of his doctrine, was set apart to be the foundation of the Church, and for this end was by Jesus himself...
"...with his truthful mouth, named Peter, the first fruits of our Lord, the first of the apostles; to whom first the Father revealed the Son; whom the Christ, with good reason, blessed.”
Origen (248): "[I]f we were to attend carefully to the Gospels, we should also find, in relation to those things which seem to be common to Peter . . . a great difference and a preeminence in the things [Jesus] said to Peter, compared with the second class [of apostles]."
Cyprian of Carthage (251): "[A] primacy is given to Peter, whereby it is made clear that there is but one Church and one chair."
Cyril of Jerusalem (350): "[Peter is] the first and foremost of the apostles" and "both the chief of the apostles and the keeper of the keys of the kingdom of heaven"
Ephraim the Syrian, as Jesus to Peter (351): "You are the head of the fountain from which my teaching flows; you are the chief of my disciples...I have chosen you to be, as it were, the firstborn in my institution so that, as the heir, you may be executor of my treasures."
Jerome (393): "[O]ne among the twelve is chosen to be their head in order to remove any occasion for division.” Jerome also, in 396, calls Peter "chief of the apostles."
Augustine (411): “Among these [apostles] Peter alone almost everywhere deserved to represent the whole Church. Because of that representation of the Church, which only he bore, he deserved to hear ‘I will give to you the keys of the kingdom of heaven.'"
Council of Ephesus (431): "[T]he head of the whole faith, the head of the apostles, is blessed Peter the apostle."
"[Peter is] prince and head of the apostles, pillar of the faith, and foundation of the Catholic Church."
Pope Leo I: "Our Lord Jesus Christ . . . has placed the principal charge on the blessed Peter, chief of all the apostles, and from him as from the head wishes his gifts to flow to all the body...
"... so that anyone who dares to secede from Peter’s solid rock may understand that he has no part or lot in the divine mystery...among the most blessed apostles, though they were alike in honor, there was a certain distinction of power. ..
"...All were equal in being chosen, but it was given to one to be preeminent over the others."
These examples and others show that the earliest Christians did, indeed, recognize Peter's primacy among the apostles.
Moreover, this appears to have been an undisputed fact, since there are no examples of Christians in the early centuries denying Peter's primacy—or, for that matter, the succession of other bishops of Rome to the Petrine office.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Catholic Church did not "baptize" a pagan festival into Halloween/All Saints Day.
All Saints Day originates from Pope Gregory III (731-741) dedicating a chapel in St. Peter’s Basilica in Rome to all the saints and fixing its anniversary as November 1. 🧵
In fact, the history goes back even farther than that.
In the early days of the Church, Christians celebrated each martyr’s feast on the anniversary of his death.
As the number of martyrs increased over time, though, and because the liturgical calendar can only accommodate a limited number of Christian luminaries in its 365-day cycle, the Church began honoring all martyrs on a single day by the later A.D.300s and the early 400s.
In 609 or 610, Pope Boniface IV consecrated the Pantheon in Rome to the Blessed Virgin Mary and all martyrs, choosing May 13 to honor the martyrs.
Pope Gregory III, as mentioned above, extended the feast to include all saints, moving its celebration to November 1, which explains why All Hallows’ Eve is celebrated on October 31, the day before.
Later, Pope Gregory IV (827-844) made it a feast for the entire Western Church.
Some believe he failed to meet crucial Old Testament prophecies.
Here are four classic objections and our answers: 🧵
Objection 1: The Messiah was supposed to bring worldwide peace (Isa. 2:4). Jesus didn’t.
As Rabbi Tovia Singer puts it: “If Jesus were the Messiah, you would know it from reading the newspaper.”
Answer: Jesus did bring peace—but it was the deeper and more important peace with God (Rom. 5:1).
And Scripture never said all prophecies had to be fulfilled at once. Many Jews themselves expected the Messiah to suffer first, then triumph later.
Jesus implied that the messianic prophecies of peace would be fulfilled when he came to earth again at the end of time (see Matt. 24).
Objection 2: The Messiah was to reunite the twelve tribes of Israel. Jesus didn’t.
Answer: He began that reunification. He chose twelve apostles to symbolize the twelve tribes (Luke 22:30).
The early Church Fathers saw the tribes spiritually reunited when Jews across the Diaspora came to Christ.
He will finish the work at the end of time (Rev. 7:4–12).
Even many Catholics wince at these Marian titles. Some avoid them altogether, worried they sound like blasphemy or competition with Christ.
But here’s what they actually mean (and why they glorify Jesus even more)🧵
First, “Co-redemptrix.”
At first glance, it seems shocking: isn’t Jesus the only Redeemer?
Yes. The “co-” here comes from the Latin cum which means “with,” not “equal.”
So “Co-redemptrix” means that Mary cooperated with Christ in his work of redemption, in a unique and unparalleled way.
How?
-At the Annunciation, she gave her total fiat (Luke 1:38)
-At the Presentation, she offered Jesus back to the Father
-At Calvary, she stood beneath the Cross, uniting her suffering with his
This does not lessen Christ’s work as Redeemer. He receives more glory by allowing a creature to participate in it.
Parents can now choose which of their unborn children gets to live—based on looks, sex, or predicted health.
It’s called “embryo selection.”
Here’s why it should trouble all of us 🧵
Last year, the Church reaffirmed a truth many have forgotten:
Children have “the right to have a fully human (and not artificially induced) origin” due to their unalienable dignity (Dignitas Infinita 49).
A child is a gift from God, not a product. No one is entitled to a child, because no one is entitled to another human being.
But with the advancement of modern technology, often people believe they do have this right—and what's more, some think they can have a say in designing their child.