Ezra Klein Profile picture
Aug 21, 2020 7 tweets 3 min read Read on X
It's tucked into the middle of my Joe Biden wrap, but I want to highlight this interesting research on polarization from @Beyond_Conflict: Yes, we dehumanize, dislike, and disagree with each other. But not as much as we think we do. vox.com/2020/8/21/2138…
The twist of their polarization index is they ask not just how we feel about the other side, but how we think the other side feels about us.

It turns out that there's a huge gulf — we assume our political opponents loathe and dehumanize us much more than they do. Image
A caveat to this: Sometimes, the cruder, angrier divisions people perceive are a more accurate reflection of our system than mass opinion.

I'd say that's true now, with Trump's presidency. Perceived polarization and division isn't fake, it's just not the whole story.
But perceived division matters: It's a self-fulfilling prophecy. The more we think someone hates us, the more we hate them. The further we think someone will go to harm us, the further we will go to protect ourselves, and those we love.
This is the core of Joe Biden's approach: In an era when disagreement often feels synonymous with dislike, Biden is modeling a politics where you can disagree without being disagreeable. You don’t let politics, or even conflict, define your relationships. Image
Will that work as a governing strategy? Not as well as Biden hopes, I fear. But is it potent as a campaigning strategy? I think it is. I think a lot of people yearn for politics to feel different than this. Biden is promising to represent them.
Anyway! You can read the whole @Beyond_Conflict report here: beyondconflictint.org/americas-divid…

And my piece, with a lot more detail, is here: vox.com/2020/8/21/2138…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ezra Klein

Ezra Klein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ezraklein

Oct 24, 2022
As part of my dive into how “affordable housing” came to cost almost $600,000 per unit in Los Angeles, I had a conversation with @HeidiEMarston that I’ll be thinking about for some time.

nytimes.com/2022/10/23/opi… ImageImage
What does it mean to trust an agency? One answer is that you can trust an agency that is transparent, heavily audited, tightly bound by rules and regulations, highly accountable to the public or other overseers.

Let’s call this trust-through-transparency.
We often talk about ideas like that as ways of increasing trust but in practice they're ways of not needing to trust.

It's really transparency as a substitution for trust.
Read 12 tweets
Aug 1, 2022
On the podcast, I've talked around this experience, and how it changed the way I see pregnancy and reproductive choice. But I've tried not to say too much, because it was @annielowrey's story to tell.

Now she's told it, at least some of it. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
I'll only add: The idea that any legislator would force her, or anyone else, to undergo this much agony and this much danger, is unthinkable to me. But it's the reality now in much of the United States.
One more thing, while I'm breaking my Twitter silence. Something you learn, being near a truly horrible pregnancy, is how common such pregnancies are, because when people know what you've been through, they begin telling you what they've been through.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 27, 2022
This is an important counterargument, so let me encourage you to read it — @Sifill_LDF's full thread, not just this one tweet — and try to answer it, and some others, and explain why I think Twitter is ill-suited for the central role it plays in our politics.
The nature of Twitter is it shrinks everything down to units of a single thought, image, video, and then makes it possible for that unit to go viral, reaching communities it would never reach and building a community behind it.
This can be incredibly powerful when there's an outrage that can be contained in one tweet. That's true for many of the cases @Sifill_LDF describes. Enormous good has come out of that.
Read 13 tweets
Apr 27, 2022
Musk's tweeting today is making me more confident of the argument I make here.

I don't think he'll change the platform that much, at least not soon. But I think having the owner of the platform tweet like he does will change the feel of it dramatically. nytimes.com/2022/04/27/opi…
On some level everyone here is providing free labor for Twitter.com. It's weird.

But now we're going to be providing free labor for Elon Musk. And Musk will be making clear his contempt for the views of a lot of the people creating on his platform. Do they stay?
How does a viral tweet or a flourishing following feel if it's to the greater glory and profits and influence of Elon? Maybe great if you love him. Pretty unsettling if you don't.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 18, 2022
We were making incredible progress on child poverty and then we just...stopped.

Worse, we're now going backwards, fast. nytimes.com/2022/04/17/opi…
One response I've heard to this column is that there are ways the Child Tax Credit could be better designed, or targeted.

I agree, and we all have our ideal design ideas here, but we're not seeing negotiations over design bog down. The policy expired, and Congress moved on.
The question of this column is why the CTC didn't generate the political force to secure expansion, or a process in which a deal was seen as a must-pass outcome.

Why have we abandoned tax credits for poor kids while we endlessly extend tax cuts for the rich?
Read 5 tweets
Mar 8, 2022
If you read what Putin is saying, this is as much or more a war over Ukrainian identity than it is over border security. And as Fiona Hill explains here, that's really being missed both in Putin's motivations and miscalculations. nytimes.com/2022/03/08/pod… ImageImage
Putin thought the Russian identity in Ukraine far stronger than it is, which would've made invasion easier. He thought the Ukrainian identity far weaker than it's proven. He thought the change in Ukrainian identity to be a Western plot, not authentic movement.
But a lot of what Putin has done, and has said, makes much more sense if you understand him to have believed that Ukraine was full of people who wanted to be Russian, and were being pulled to the West against their will and nature.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(