Black Ribbon Day effectively constitutes a collaboration between anti-communist Nazis and collaborators imported into Canada as "refugees" post WW2, and the capitalist ruling class who appreciates their fervent opposition to pro-social communist activism and agitation.
Since 2009, in Canada, both Liberals and Conservatives have been trying to make "Black Ribbon Day" a thing.
The August 23rd remembrance attempts to draw an equivalence between the Holocaust and "the crimes of Communism".
"Nazi hunter" Steve Ramban points out that "between 2,000 and 5,000 war criminals fled to Canada after the Second World War, but not one Nazi has ever been successfully prosecuted in this country". nationalpost.com/news/canada/na…
The Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals in Canada, established in 1985, toothlessly probed the matter and did the absolute minimum in response to its findings. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deschênes…
Black Ribbon Day is quite literally Nazi propaganda, and constitutes a form of Holocaust denialism, as it reframes it as only one among many 20th century atrocities, falsely asserting that it was 1) comparable and 2) relatively small by death count.
For example,
The movement is pushed by the same lobby that pushes for Nazi monuments in e.g. Ottawa and Oakville. thenation.com/article/world/…
One of the most prominent pushers of this movement is Chrystia Freeland, who during Justin Trudeau's tenure as PM, has held the roles of 1) Minister of Foreign Affairs, 2) Deputy Prime Minister, 3) Minister of Finance.
Her grandfather Michael Chomiak was quite literally a Ukrainian Nazi collaborator who repurposed stolen jewish presses to publish Nazi propaganda. ottawacitizen.com/news/national/…
Chrystia Freeland often trolls people who know this fact by speaking glowingly about how "our grandparents" were the "greatest generation".
Curiously, the USA heralded her rise in government as "Canada Adopts America First Foreign Policy". thegrayzone.com/2019/07/05/can…
This is of course deeply intertwined with the US project of turning Ukraine into a NATO outpost in eastern Europe, supervising and promoting the rise of extremely overt anti-semitism.
This is also visible in how the US, Canada, and Ukraine voted "No" on a UN resolution to condemn Nazism. huffingtonpost.ca/2014/11/26/can…
This was justified in terms of "free speech", and the demand of an equally strong condemnation of "Stalinism".
This is part of the ongoing propaganda project of erasing the Soviet victory over the Nazis in WW2.
Americans and Brits, not content with stealing credit, go on to portray the mortal enemies as collaborators, against factual evidence. telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews…
Alberta Advantage has a fantastic podcast episode discussing the relationship between capitalism, Nazism, Statues, Museums, and Canada. albertaadvantagepod.com/2020/08/22/the…
I hope people start pushing back against this grotesque project in a major way!
This is a problem that Losurdo writes about often, adapting Hegel. "Legality" matters.
But Westerner radicals are very given to brag that legality is the enemy of all good intentions, and that illegalism is basically inherently virtuous, and don't see the point of such pursuits.
Engels summarized it very succinctly, in a way that simply could not more elegantly expose how scientific socialism is opposed to anarchism:
"Hegel was the first to state correctly the relation between freedom and necessity. To him, freedom is the insight into necessity."
And Plekhanov says similar things in his philosophical writings, about which Lenin says "nothing better has been written on Marxism anywhere in the world."
To understand tortured news language today, like goofily not mentioning "Israel" in articles, notice how people relate to history.
Back in the day people knew "The Holodomor" was a Nazi joke. But NYT, etc. were carefully ambiguous. Decades later, all that ambiguity pays off.
Of course, things look unstable and all that "future-proofing" may never pay off.
But just try to imagine a particular world a hundred years from now, where Zionists continue to rewrite history: "Oh yeah? If it happened that way you say, why did no NYT article mention it?"
"Are you suggesting *all* the mainstream was colluding against 'Palestine'? All of it? Psh, ridiculous! A conspiracy theory!"
We mock this today because we see it side by side.
But in a hundred years? Just look at how people speak of the USSR today. "Radicals" ate it all up.
It's not like pensions were amazing, mind you. They're a concession, not worker control.
But people with fat 401ks who cry "Who could callously invest in horrible companies like Exxon and Facebook and Lockheed-Martin!?" amuse.
*You* do!
Restricted funds are a fig leaf.
It's bothered me forever.
Capitalist governments basically figured out that, if the whole point is to tax workers then use funds to repress them, with "tax-free investment opportunities" they could simply skip the middleman and *directly* have workers fund corporations.
She's got a trippy yet familiar combination of charisma and wrongness.
Take her commentary on the Plekhanov-Lenin split.
She's attacking Plekhanov to defend Lenin, but she comes off as naive: she underplays what Plekhanov detects in Lenin, while *also* underplaying the correctness of Lenin's insights on "spontaneity."
But she obviously authentically and genuinely believes what she is saying.
Until the very very last (before her murder) she is saying things like "We lose, and we lose, and we lose, but then we'll win!"