Black Ribbon Day effectively constitutes a collaboration between anti-communist Nazis and collaborators imported into Canada as "refugees" post WW2, and the capitalist ruling class who appreciates their fervent opposition to pro-social communist activism and agitation.
Since 2009, in Canada, both Liberals and Conservatives have been trying to make "Black Ribbon Day" a thing.
The August 23rd remembrance attempts to draw an equivalence between the Holocaust and "the crimes of Communism".
"Nazi hunter" Steve Ramban points out that "between 2,000 and 5,000 war criminals fled to Canada after the Second World War, but not one Nazi has ever been successfully prosecuted in this country". nationalpost.com/news/canada/na…
The Commission of Inquiry on War Criminals in Canada, established in 1985, toothlessly probed the matter and did the absolute minimum in response to its findings. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deschênes…
Black Ribbon Day is quite literally Nazi propaganda, and constitutes a form of Holocaust denialism, as it reframes it as only one among many 20th century atrocities, falsely asserting that it was 1) comparable and 2) relatively small by death count.
For example,
The movement is pushed by the same lobby that pushes for Nazi monuments in e.g. Ottawa and Oakville. thenation.com/article/world/…
One of the most prominent pushers of this movement is Chrystia Freeland, who during Justin Trudeau's tenure as PM, has held the roles of 1) Minister of Foreign Affairs, 2) Deputy Prime Minister, 3) Minister of Finance.
Her grandfather Michael Chomiak was quite literally a Ukrainian Nazi collaborator who repurposed stolen jewish presses to publish Nazi propaganda. ottawacitizen.com/news/national/…
Chrystia Freeland often trolls people who know this fact by speaking glowingly about how "our grandparents" were the "greatest generation".
Curiously, the USA heralded her rise in government as "Canada Adopts America First Foreign Policy". thegrayzone.com/2019/07/05/can…
This is of course deeply intertwined with the US project of turning Ukraine into a NATO outpost in eastern Europe, supervising and promoting the rise of extremely overt anti-semitism.
This is also visible in how the US, Canada, and Ukraine voted "No" on a UN resolution to condemn Nazism. huffingtonpost.ca/2014/11/26/can…
This was justified in terms of "free speech", and the demand of an equally strong condemnation of "Stalinism".
This is part of the ongoing propaganda project of erasing the Soviet victory over the Nazis in WW2.
Americans and Brits, not content with stealing credit, go on to portray the mortal enemies as collaborators, against factual evidence. telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews…
Alberta Advantage has a fantastic podcast episode discussing the relationship between capitalism, Nazism, Statues, Museums, and Canada. albertaadvantagepod.com/2020/08/22/the…
I hope people start pushing back against this grotesque project in a major way!
So, for weeks Rocko has been going on a crusade in defense of "genAI" against those upset that Disney gets to rip off IP who also elsewhere mourn the ruling against Internet Archive and free access.
I'm with Rocko. That criticism is sentimental in a bougie way!
I think genAI is subpar technology that won't deliver on its hype (redsails.org/dialectics-and…), but I think all this flowery talk about "small humble artists representing humanity against evil soulless machines" is downright tawdry. x.com/Rocko64_/statu…
What this technology is causing is a rift between pro-IP capitalists and anti-IP capitalists. These two camps of capitalists will fight each other no matter what!
Intelligent workers would find a way to tip the odds of this battle as much as possible towards the anti-IP camp.
@RedSailsOrg h/t @SpreadWhiz and @m1vql1hdwt for the great find, from a while back.
The tell-tale of lumbering, useless, repressive "communist" institutions is that they repress any kind of discussion while accomplishing nothing specific to speak about whatsoever.
@RedSailsOrg @SpreadWhiz @m1vql1hdwt If an institution doesn't call for specific actions with measurable impacts, then its ideas should be discussed openly.
If it calls for actions, we should judge their effectiveness instead.
One way or another the Party is being tested: either in ideas or in actions.
You've maybe read Marx's famous line about "ruthless criticism of all that exists." Have you read the 1843 letter it's from, though?
I found existing translations read a bit tricky, so I attempted a new one, to bring its ideas out more. redsails.org/an-ruge/
@RedSailsOrg 25-year-old Marx, having just earned his doctorate in philosophy two years earlier (1841), is hyping up his friend Ruge towards their new joint venture, a journal.
Marx believes that the only outcome of serious high-soaring philosophy in their day can be… political activity!
@RedSailsOrg It struck me how much Marx emphasizes that "philosopher-critics" should not assert what should be important, but rather sould *explain* why what people already care about *is* important.
This is a problem that Losurdo writes about often, adapting Hegel. "Legality" matters.
But Westerner radicals are very given to brag that legality is the enemy of all good intentions, and that illegalism is basically inherently virtuous, and don't see the point of such pursuits.
Engels summarized it very succinctly, in a way that simply could not more elegantly expose how scientific socialism is opposed to anarchism:
"Hegel was the first to state correctly the relation between freedom and necessity. To him, freedom is the insight into necessity."
And Plekhanov says similar things in his philosophical writings, about which Lenin says "nothing better has been written on Marxism anywhere in the world."