How does it matter that how many on which side died in the aftermath? What matters is who started the violence? Who orchestrated and planned it? How sick one has to be to ignore the primary motive and then keep a tab as to how many died on each side?
https://twitter.com/rupasubramanya/status/1296815287501836289
From Bhagalpur to Mumbai, Gujarat to Muzaffarnagar and Meerut to Kokrajhar, seculars completely ignore the fact that all rioting starts only and only from one community. There get worried only when more numbers of that community get killed in retaliatory violence.
The underlying cunningness is clear. The fact that minority starts every single riot should not be spoken about. To them the immorality in the whole thing is only the retaliatory violence. In their scheme of things Hindus should simply roll over and die.
When belligerence of fanatics waiting to break into violence every now and then over flimsy pretexts is sought to be covered up by such cleverness, where does it leave the majority Hindus?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
