2. I first noticed the following back in college, but HT to @ManilanH for inspiring me to write this now and to @AriLamm for his "Why to Read the Bible in Hebrew" series for reasons that will become apparent shortly.
Plus, it's relevant to this week's Torah reading.
@ManilanH @AriLamm 3. In the Biblical narrative of the Exodus, Pharaoh refuses to let the people of Israel leave, God (through Moses) brings a total of 10 plagues to induce Pharaoh to "let my people go."
2. First, here's Jason Stanley on "The End of Civic Compassion." Setting aside the laughability of the Before Time being an era of hand-holding, we've got a kicker of a paragraph in the next tweet newrepublic.com/article/181274…
3. Painting all of your political opponents as communists is fascist. Painting all your political opponents as fascists is not (and let's not even start with white-supremacy)
For those insisting on differentiating between Hamas and the Palestinian people as a whole, as recently as March 2023, 58% of those polled by the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research supported armed confrontations. pcpsr.org/en/node/938
And from June 2022, "59% view armed attacks against Israelis inside Israel as serving the national interest in ending the occupation and 56% support these attacks" pcpsr.org/en/node/912
The pertinent question is not if Palestinians support the specific parties of Hamas or Fatah, but if they support murdering Jews.
1. I've made several comments about the debate over judicial reform in Israel. Due to Twitter being Twitter, criticizing one argument from one side is taken as an endorsement of the other.
For anyone who cares, here's my actual opinion 🧵
2. Checks and balances are not just a slogan, but in theory, ought to curb the potential excesses of any branch of government. The main problem is that any institution of power is susceptible to corruption.
This includes the checks and balances.
3. Rhetorical appeals to things like "will of the people", "democracy", "justice", and the like are typically empty references/appeals to vague concepts that just so coincidentally happen to correlate with one's preferences.