Gautam Bhatia Profile picture
Aug 27, 2020 8 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Some thoughts on this deep dive by the @EconomicTimes into the making of the Data Protection Report (article unfortunately paywalled, but honestly, just this one alone is worth the subscription).

economictimes.indiatimes.com/prime/economy-…

(1/n)
@EconomicTimes When the Data Protection Report came out, many of us voiced concern about how surveillance reform was completely excluded.

Now it turns out that the same people who were drafting the Data Protection Report were also advising government on NATGRID.

(2/N)
@EconomicTimes And not to mention, had argued against the right to privacy in the Supreme Court.

You may have the best will in the world, but simultaneously advising the government on how to facilitate a national surveillance database, while drafting a data protection report...?

(3/n)
This is like putting the wolf in charge of the sheephouse. The wolf may be a nice guy. He's still a wolf.

(4/n)
It was also pointed out when the Data Protection Report came out that it seemed to be explicitly drafted to "save" Aadhaar. Someone sarcastically called it the "Aadhaar Saving Report." Well, the people drafting it had facilitated the Aadhaar Act and defended it in Court.

(5/n)
What you effectively get in the end, therefore, is not "independent" work, but - and there's a lot in the ET report that indicates this, including comments by committee members - work that is beholden to government and private interests, such as NATGRID, Aadhaar etc.

(6/n)
Closing this thread by emphasising once again that this is not about individuals.

This is about a broken system of lawmaking, defined by opacity and backdoor facilitation of government interest under the mask of framing an "independent" Data Protection law.

(7/n)
In conclusion, repeating yesterday's point: the moral and ethical responsibility of wielding law as a weapon against people's rights is a heavy one.

Don't be the drafters of India's equivalent of the torture memos.

(8/8)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gautam Bhatia

Gautam Bhatia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gautambhatia88

Mar 27
Reading this excellent book, which has a lot of resonance with present-day events.

Sharing some of the most striking paragraphs. Image
“Mau Mau had to be eliminated at all costs,” he later recalled, “something had to be done to remove these people from society.”

Thinking about where that kind of language has been used recently. Image
“He and his finance minister, Ernest Vasey, despaired that Mau Mau was not communist. Had it been, the British government would have given them a blank check to suppress the movement, as it had done with General Templar and the communist uprising in British colonial Malaya.” Image
Read 10 tweets
Mar 10
In light of recent events with respect to the Election Commission, there is persistent confusion about the constitutionality of the current selection process, and the Supreme Court's 2023 judgment on the appointment of Election Commissioners.

A brief thread. (1/n)
Article 324(2) of the Constitution grants to the President the power to appoint the Election Commissioners, subject to Parliamentary law.

The intention of the framers of the Constitution was that the President's power would be transitional, until Parliament made a law.

(2/n)
The text of Article 324(2) of the Constitution:

(3/n)indiankanoon.org/doc/950881/
Read 20 tweets
Aug 10, 2023
Have seen some confusion about the new Election Commissioners Bill, and what the SC held in its judgment earlier this year. Here is a brief thread to clear a few things up.

Earlier this year, a 5J-bench of the SC passed a detailed judgment on the independence of the EC. [1/n]
The SC was examining Article 324(2) of the Constitution, which says that appointment of the CEC and ECs shall "subject to the provisions of any law made in that behalf by Parliament, be made by the President."

Article 324: [2/n]indiankanoon.org/doc/950881/
Examining this provision in light of its context, its history, the debates in the Constituent Assembly, and the role of the EC, the Court found that the intention behind Article 324(2) had been that Parliament would soon pass a detailed law securing an *independent* EC. [3/n]
Read 20 tweets
Jul 12, 2023
#MilanKundera, who passed away today, was one of those formative writers in my life. Sharing a thread of some of the most memorable lines from his works, that I've scribbled in notebooks over the years. 🧵
"The dance whirling around them is no longer a dance but barricades yet again, we are in 1848, & in 1870, and in 1945, & we are in Paris, Warsaw, Budapest, Prague & Vienna, & these yet again are the eternal crowds crossing through history, leaping from one barricade to another."
"Ah, what naivete, he reflected, to believe in the existence of a song that never ends!"
Read 16 tweets
Mar 24, 2023
Today, the SC has given one of the worst and most damaging civil rights judgments in its history.

The 2011 judgment in Arup Bhuyan’s case was one of the only checks against executive abuse of the UAPA. Today, the SC has removed that check.
The judgment in Arup Bhuyan had understood the simple point that the word “membership” is so broad and vague that State can make completely baseless allegations and keep people in jail for years without trial. So they established a higher threshold. Now that protection is gone.
This judgment further entrenches the SC as the Executive Court of India, notwithstanding the protestations of an ex-CJI at the “conclave” last week: it is a court that acts as an extended arm of the executive, and not as a protector of civil rights.
Read 6 tweets
Mar 22, 2023
A care package from Lagos, courtesy @masobebooks and @Ohmstonweth.
Also, nice to hold in my hands at last, the blurbed copy.
A bonus. Remember editing an interview with TJ Benson back in 2017, for @strangehorizons’ 100 African Writers of SFF series.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(