It’s Uniswap but with a token and liquidity incentives.
Instead of Uniswaps 30bp fee going entirely to liquidity providers (LPs), only 25bps goes to LPs with the remaining 5bps distributed to SUSHI token holders.
What's interesting is the token distribution plan.
SushiSwap will award tokens to users who stake selected Uniswap LP tokens into SushiSwap contracts.
The following are eligible Uniswap LP tokens - all ETH / [Popular DeFi token] pairs.
For the first 100,000 blocks (~two weeks) following its launch tomorrow SushiSwap will mint and distribute 1,000 SUSHI tokens per block to the stakers of each of the supported pools.
After the 100,000th block rewards will drop to 100 SUSHI tokens per block.
The idea is to provide strong incentives upfront to suck in liquidity ahead of its “Liquidity Migration”.
This “Liquidity Migration” will effectively fork the liquidity from Uniswap, with little effort required from users beyond that initially required to stake.
This could significantly reduce the friction of forking an AMM.
SushiSwap is more than likely a shitcoin protocol and is not a realistic challenger.
The most reliable thesis for compounding capital this cycle has been to own fast-growing projects that people actually use.
Everything else is a game of musical chairs, with the dominant narrative changing every couple months, and Burj Khalifa charts that rarely bounce back.
This supposed shift to fundamentals everyone is talking about isn’t coming… it’s already here, but it can only be observed over the course of many quarters and years in the assets that actually compound.
The fast-growing part is key here.
Plenty of value traps in the cryptoeconomy or projects whose fundamentals are solid but don’t support the valuations.
Often times the strongest fundamental names tap into speculative activity for growth which many write off as “not real”
Have fallen prey to some of these situations before as we all have.
Takes introspection to realize you’re being too prescriptive about what should be driving growth rather than accepting what is.
Regardless of whether the Trump coin is real or not, at $9 billion in 3 hours, it is already the largest onchain wealth creation event in the history crypto.
Goes without saying what this means for Solana if real
Will say though, I have mixed feelings about this.
Simultaneously a potential mass onboarding event and a huge risk that it makes the entire industry look like a scam.
Solana’s growing ecosystem of assets, applications, businesses, and users is becoming a compounding superstructure, positioning Solana to be a secular winner of the cryptoeconomy.
This is becoming evident in the data which shows Solana rivaling Ethereum in value creation.
Will infrastructure multiples compress over time and app multiples rise?
We at Syncracy believe that apps capturing a greater share of the global blockchain fee pool and outearning most infrastructure is likely an inflection point for the reckoning that’s to come.
Over the past year Syncracy accumulated a large position in MKR.
We believe Maker could command a $40+ billion valuation this cycle given its vital role in financing Ethereum’s economy — a multi-billion dollar fee opportunity.
Our thesis on Maker in the Endgame Era.
1/
Maker is the leading decentralized bank in the cryptoeconomy.
At ~2x 2025E revenue, we believe Maker is one of the best risk / reward opportunities today given its industry leading earnings, best-in-class unit economics, and growing market dominance.
Maker is a leviathan amongst the leaders, capturing nearly 40% of all DeFi profits on Ethereum.
Its competitive advantage is centered around its currency Dai —the most widely used decentralized stablecoin in the industry with its deep liquidity, integrations, and track record.