A continuous assault on transparency by the Modi govt since 2014.
They don't even listen to the Supreme Court of this country. Despite SC ordering appointment of Info Commissioners in Nov 2019, till date those 4 vacancies haven't been filled.
The Centre filed a so-called "Compliance report" informing the SC that they have complied with its orders.
But vacancies still existed!
Is this not contempt of court? Is this not lowering the dignity of the Supreme Court? How can one so brazenly lie on an affidavit?
2/n
Now last month, I requested the now retired Chief IC Bimal Julka to constitute a "COVID-special bench" to expeditiously hear all matters relating to the pandemic.
"You can't have everything your way Mr. Das" is what I got as a response from the Chief.
Was my demand wrong? 3/n
Now the total vacancies have skyrocketed to FIVE! The total strength should be 11.
36000 cases pending. Remember, time is of the essence in the RTI Act. Can one wait for 2 years to get their case heard at the Commission?
Less than 1% cases involve complex legal arguments. 4/n
99% matters are simple & straightforward & takes the Commissioners just 10-15 minutes to decide.
So is the 2 year waiting period justified? It's torture and strangulation of the transparency regime!
#YearInReview: 2024 was profoundly meaningful. I worked on 2 long-form stories—investigating extrajudicial killings and police shootouts in Uttar Pradesh and profiling CJI DY Chandrachud—both of which took 4 months each, eventually published at 6,000 & 16,000 words.
A thread.
In January, for @AJEnglish, I reported how the three new criminal laws and the Telecom Act have the potential to turn India into a Police and Surveillance state. Concern for civil liberty continue. aljazeera.com/news/2024/1/17…
In February, for @Article14live, I reported on the blocking of hate-crime documenter @HindutvaWatchIn's X account and website. I highlighted the loopholes in existing laws that allow the govt such drastic, arbitrary measures. article-14.com/post/takedown-…
There is great confusion over DDA Tree Felling case being withdrawn from Justice Abhay Oka’s Bench. Let me break it down.
1. The issue of ridge- both forest ridge and morphological ridge in Delhi has always been a part of MC Mehta case (since 1985). This was before Oka J.
2. There is also the TN Godavarman case which is about larger forests etc. before Justice BR Gavai’s bench.
3. On 6 Dec 2023 the CEC filed Report no.36 of 2023 in MC Mehta case recommending that approval be granted to DDA for construction of approach roads to CAPFIMS in the Satbari area.
4. On 15 February 2024, in MC Mehta case before Oka, an IA was filed by the DDA requesting felling of 1051 trees for the approach roads. While this was pending, the DDA allegedly on orders of LG went ahead and cut the trees anyway.
Although Chief Justice of India D Y Chandrachud promised 14 opposition parties of safeguarding them against misuse of CBI and ED in April 2023, he has failed to list 3 "crucial cases" in the past 20 months of his 24-month tenure. A 🧵.
At the Oxford Union Society lecture on 4 June 2024, Chief Justice Chandrachud talked about how courts “step in” when “the State may be unwilling to balance [individual] rights against weighty purposes.”
Yet, three crucial cases pertaining the draconian PMLA linger before him.
These cases that directly challenge or raise questions about the constitutionality of various provisions of the “draconian” Prevention of Money Laundering Act 2002 (PMLA) and impact its administration have remained unheard for the past 12 to 55 months.
The 3 new criminal laws have been criticised for their potential to violate human rights. HM Amit Shah had claimed "extensive consultation" done but attempts to know details of inputs given failed at Supreme Court, HCs, Home Min.
The new laws will be effective from 1st of July. They increase police powers by increasing time period for police custody, leading to fears of custodial torture, introduce special offences like terrorism without any safeguards, and bring back sedition. Amit Shah in his speech...
...claimed to have sought views from “... all governors, chief ministers, lieutenant governors, administrators… the CJI, chief justices of all high courts, bar councils, law universities… all MPs, all MLAs… all Indian Police Service officers, and all collectorates”. 3/13
#Important: I have found 2 instances of alleged irregularities in allocation of government bungalows to certain Rajya Sabha MPs.
While opposition leaders like Rahul Gandhi, Mahua Moitra, Raghav Chadha were evicted or attempted to be evicted from their allocated bungalows…
1/9
…in Delhi with great haste, when it comes to leaders from friendly/alliance parties to the BJP, the government’s own norms & rules have been violated with impunity.
To understand the irregularity, we have to understand how allocation is done.
The Housing Committee of the Rajya Sabha makes recommendations. It is currently chaired by BJP MP C.M. Ramesh and the allocations here have happened under him.
First-time MPs are entitled to a Type-5 accommodation in the normal course,
A group that has documented over 3,000 news stories and 1,600 videos of minority persecution and hate speech by right-wing Hindu groups, @HindutvaWatchIn, has become inaccessible in India, on d orders of the central government. A 🧵
On 16 Jan- X complied with the IT Ministry's directive to block access to @HindutvaWatchIn's account in India. The reasons are unknown, its founder @raqib_naik told me.
On 19 Jan- IT Min issued a notice to Raqib stating that they may block the website too. Days later, they did.
The website maybe available on some servers, but an open-source resource reveals tampering with d website in India.
Modi’s government has been criticised for suppressing tweets, posts, user accounts, access to news reports, media websites, and investigative documentaries