Historically Fascism was born as a revolutionary movement that rejected Marxist historical materialism (the link between the revolution and the necessary logic of history) while keeping the dialectical aspect (man as creator, politics as true religion, the primacy of praxis).
So, the Fascist type (Mussolini) was an "activist without a plan," who valued action and personal power as ends in themselves but had no vision of the future. This is why he ended up an ally/instrument of conservative forces that gave Fascism the appearance of being reactionary.
In that sense, some of today's "revolutionaries" seem more Fascist than Marxist. The "other half" of Marxism (sociologism, secularism, technocracy) is the ideology of the professional classes (so called "liberals" who are economically quite "conservative.")
So one can envision a strange scenario in which a semi-Marxist elite which calls itself liberal uses for its own purposes Fascist types who call themselves Marxist.
The kind of response this elicits on the other side is, for the most part, strictly symmetrical...
The kind of response this elicits on the other side is, for the most part, strictly symmetrical...
