My Authors
Read all threads
Preprint anonymity debate continues!

TLDR for those who missed the prior discussion: non-anonymous preprints systematically disadvantage the unknown labs and/or underrepresented communities.
My previous post: hackingsemantics.xyz/2020/anonymity/ /1
A new post by @ducha_aiki and @amy_tabb argues that fairness comes at a steep opportunity cost for the small labs. Full text here: amytabb.com/ts/2020_08_21/
/2
To summarize both posts, we have the following trade-off for the unknown/underrepresented authors:

* anonymous preprints: better acceptance chance;
* arXiv: lower acceptance chance, but more chances to try to promote unpublished work and get invited for talks and interviews.
/3
So the choice is fairer acceptance vs faster career-building.

I'd personally still vote for anonymous preprints. The field is getting so crowded that PR makes more and more difference => we're starting to select for journalistic/networking skills rather than better science. /4
Neither of us can speak for everyone, though. Perhaps what we need to do is to ask a large sample of grad students (with a fair share of those from non-famous institutions and underrepresented communities)? And not on Twitter, as people here are already active networkers. /5
I'd also love to hear from the hiring side: as a recruiter/potential PI, would you rather screen students based on fewer papers (the published ones), or the whole unfiltered pool of all the preprints and code? Is it better to have more/fresher data - or less to wade through?
/6
Last but not least: @ducha_aiki and @amy_tabb also bring up the fact that non-virtual conferences by themselves hold up the demographic status quo, since many underrepresented/non-famous authors can't get visas or afford the travel even if accepted. /7
The conference cost filter is actually the same whether preprints are anonymous or not. Also, for the unknown/underrepresented authors to even try to get a remote presentation, they have to be accepted first - and they have a higher chance of that if review is anonymous. /8
Still, this point is smth to keep in mind in the debate on going back to offline conferences. Yes, they are much more effective and pleasant, but this needs to be weighed against both the social and carbon costs. /9
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh.

Keep Current with Anna Rogers

Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

Twitter may remove this content at anytime, convert it as a PDF, save and print for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video

1) Follow Thread Reader App on Twitter so you can easily mention us!

2) Go to a Twitter thread (series of Tweets by the same owner) and mention us with a keyword "unroll" @threadreaderapp unroll

You can practice here first or read more on our help page!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3.00/month or $30.00/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!