I bet none of them have spent the time considering the implications of the adoption of gender ideology on women & children's human rights that @jk_rowling has
Yesterday a young staff member of @RFKHumanRights was on here saying how JKR's statements "go against everything we stand for as an organisation, saying how it was "the youth" that had brought it up and that the board had been slow to move.
We got into conversation when I asked for their reasoning about whether there was any legitimate conflict of rights.
I got back the 13 word mantra "Trans women are women etc.. ....analysis done!"
He also called me a TERF and told me to "sit down dear"
(He later privately apologised for "TERF" after I explained that it is a slur associated with threats of violence against women)
We talked, and he said such things as "sex is assigned at birth" and "gender is a social construct"
I've blanked his name out because he has put his account on private, and because this isn't really about this one young staff member's lack of argument.
It is about the organisation that says #speaktruthtopower condemning JKR for speaking up for women's rights.
Kerry Kennedy's statement suggests that the senior leadership and trustees @RFKHumanRights have not engaged with the issues but have been strong armed into a position.
I bet most of the people on the board are in some agreement with JKR's nuanced and compassionate view about sex and gender identity.
Serious people, serious organisations need to step up, do their job, make space for serious debate.
A curious thing about the draft government guidance: It has no conceptual underpinning at all
“In recent years, we have seen a significant increase in the number of children who are questioning the way they feel about being a boy or a girl, including the physical attributes of their sex and the related ways in which they fit into society. “
Er ok…🤷♀️
It then dives into “where a child or their parent has raised a request relating to social transition”
The phrase appears 29 times in the guidance, but is never explained what it means or what it might involve.
The schools are told they must "consider what is in the best interests of the child and other children, and a decision relating to social transition may not be the same as a child’s wishes. "
The phrase “gender identity” appears 36 times in the judgment
Leonardo’s policy is that any member of staff who is proposing to to undergo, is undergoing or has undergone a process for the purposes of reassigning their gender can use the toilets intended for the opposite sex.
I am hugely grateful to Naomi Cunningham for the work that she has done as the first chair of Sex Matters, and for her equally important role as a barrister representing claimants using the law to fight for justice.
The arguments made on behalf of the Women and Equalities Minister yesterday were a desperate attempt to shoehorn "case-by-case" back into the single sex services following the Supreme Court judgment.
At paragraph 36 she says there are there are no equivalent exceptions to the single sex service exceptions that apply to employers.
She seems to have forgotten the provisions about protection of women in Schedule 22!
She said that the FWS case was principally decided by reference to maternity rights.
It wasn't. The SC concluded "it important that the EA is interpreted in a clear & consistent way so that groups which share a PC can be identified by those on whom the Act imposes obligations so that they can perform those obligations in a practical way"
Ollie was Chair of the Civil Service Rainbow Alliance for 9 years from 2008 -2017, then held a number of roles in the GEO.
So all the time that the government was getting the law wrong and getting Stonewall prizes for he was leading this.
In 2012 he wrote in Civil Service World about his personal opinion that the government shouldn't renege on its commitment to this particular approach to diversity.