Assimilation is complicated issue in Chinese history.
The last Imperial Chinese dynasty, Qing, was founded and ruled for its entire duration by Manchus, originally a militarized nomadic society organized around Eight Banners, who secured hegemony in their homeland Manchuria /1
and then invaded and conquered the Han Chinese-ruled Ming Dynasty. Yet, over the centuries following conquest, and replaying an inevitable theme in imperial Chinese history, the conquerors in ways became the conquered, as the Manchu ruling class adopted most Han Chinese /2
cultural practices (with key exceptions including foot binding, which Manchus steered clear of) and Mandarin Chinese language, to such an extent that by early 1900s, in the last days of the Qing Dynasty, few if any Manchus outside the Imperial Palace could even speak or write /3
Manchu, let alone using it in daily practice in life and at work.
Yet, there were subtle and important distinctions between Manchu and the Han who they assimilated into. Positions of power in the Manchu’s homeland, which by 1800s became chock-full of Han Chinese immigrants /4
from North China proper, remained stolidly in Manchu hands. The Manchu side of my family ran the local law enforcement and local jail, for instance—positions for which Manchu ethnicity was essentially required, even though by that point they spoke only Mandarin Chinese and /5
for all intents and purposes were Han Chinese in manner and custom.
But the story of assimilation doesn’t run only in the direction outlined above, and isn’t limited to after the Manchu conquest.
We always thought one side of my family was Manchu. To our great surprise, /6
none of us have Manchu DNA on genetic testing. Who know’s if it was just a flaw of the testing? But there’s a more straightforward and plausible explanation—that all the Manchus in the family have been Han Chinese all along.
Even before the Manchu invasion of China, the /7
Manchu Eight Banners had recruited many Han Chinese and Mongol immigrants in Manchuria into their ranks. For all practical intents and purposes, they became Manchu, were Manchu in attire, custom, and sociopolitical allegiance, and their past—and actual genetic ancestry—no /8
longer mattered. They had been assimilated into the Manchus, while the Eight Banners grew into the formidable force that eventually took on the Han Chinese Ming Dynasty and conquered it.
So, from Han to Manchu because of assimilation, and back to Han again because of /9
assimilation and then the 21st century biotechnological marvel of consumer genetic testing. Has it ever mattered that that side of the family was Manchu, or Han?
Well, calling themselves Manchu had helped in Chinese affirmative action for ethnic minorities.
That’s about it. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A reason why East Asian culture traditionally highly prizes education, is because in 19th century to early 20th century East Asian society, education was a prized skill asset in short societal supply. If you were highly educated, not only could you sit for imperial examinations
to embark upon a professional career of high prestige, power, and material comfort and wealth, but your literacy was also a practically marketable skill by itself in your community. The masses of your illiterate community neighbors could hire you to write letters or petitions on
their behalf, or write decorative banners for them, or read things to them. If you're an enlisted soldier with literary skills, you would be catapulted to a privileged position in your army unit's headquarters staff to help write and read dispatched military messages. Education
Using Kash Patel as FBI director is a prime example of the tactics and methods of populist revolution as intra-elite competition. Kash Patel, a professionally failed lawyer from a mediocre law school and unable to break into ranks of partnership-track of elite law firms, probably
privately harbors intense personal feelings of professional failure and envious resentment of his more successful fellow multi-millionaire lawyers at elite law firm partnerships who are the embodiment of the “establishment elite”. In other words, Kash Patel is a “loser” elite
whose intra-elite competitive incentives to smash and wreck vengeance against “winner” establishment elites would be particularly strong and ripe for harvesting by Trump regime. I’ve previously outlined on this website why a strongman supreme leader, such as Trump, prefers weak
for Hodgkin lymphoma, which had been one of the deadliest human diseases but the story of which had been completely and utterly transformed by Dr. Henry Kaplan’s pioneering work.
Dr. Henry Kaplan brought immense professional fame and accolades to himself and his organization,
Stanford Hospital and Stanford University School of Medicine.
But things for Dr. Henry Kaplan did not take the trajectory of unlimited rocket-ship ascent that you’d expect for a man as utterly accomplished and successful as him.
Part of Vietnamese communism's veneration of Ho Chi Minh was the idea and myth that he was a lifelong celibate revolutionary, that he was involuntarily celibate owing to the necessary workmanlike toil on the sacred revolutionary path. But in fact, Ho Chi Minh did have a Cantonese
wife during his revolutionary career, although he soon abandoned her for furtherance of his revolutionary path. It can also be surmised that Ho Chi Minh probably had a conflicted and wistful attitude towards his involuntarily celibate status later on as a senior communist leader,
with his evident and visible thirst for companionship of female attendants famous among another foreign country's communist leaders and organizers receiving his frequent visitations to that foreign country. Why does Vietnamese communism actively deny and cover up Ho Chi Minh's
Authoritarian ideologies that are the most effective at mass-mobilizing popular support are equivalent to secular religions. A religion can be a church, or a cult (although the two are definitely not mutually exclusive). A church is characterized by organizational discipline—
Party discipline, military discipline, thought discipline, behavioral discipline, all become core to the soul of the revolutionary movement and authoritarian regime ideology. A cult is characterized by irrational, devotional belief—the Party’s Supreme Leader being a living god,
a secular revolutionary equivalent of a Shinto national religion with the earth revolving around Emperor as the sun beaming off brilliant rays at the gravitational orbital center. A revolutionary movement can have elements of both church and cult—church’s ruthless organizational
JD Vance rightfully earned his place as Trump's right-hand man and Vice President, because of his outstanding abilities, high intelligence, and public renown. Yet, exactly because of those same qualities, he is also a long-term threat to Trump's personal and familial dynastic
hold on power, a long-term strategic challenge to the orderly succession and continuity of power, privilege, and influence, from Trump to his familial dynastic successors. Whether Trump understands that he has truly invited a potential monster into his personal closet, or whether
he got giddy and enthused over JD Vance's impeccable credentials and energy like an American businessman roleplaying (cosplaying) an authoritarian dictator that he Trump is, isn't clear, although my suspicions lean towards the latter possibility. Furthermore, it is also precisely