Took a family bike ride down to the @artinstitutechi today. Between here and there there are some amazing bike lanes and some ... not-so-amazing roads for bikes.
Some of the worst are in Lincoln Park, where @AldermanSmith43 took down a #SlowStreet without a replacement. 1/
I've been complaining and will continue to complain.
But I'll also be productive. .@AldermanSmith43, I'd love to invite you to take a bike ride through your ward with me and my family. We can go from my apartment to the zoo on Armitage, our supposed bike-friendly street. 2/
Or we can ride down to Payton, where my daughter's starting school this year. Or we can go anywhere else you want.
But it may help your sense of urgency to get a feel for what it is like to bike through your ward. And honestly, sincerely, we'd love to help you see it. 3/
As a side note, @AldermanSmith43, we all bike with masks. We're happy to keep 6 feet apart. And we're not going to take you on strange, excessively-dangerous roads, just the ones that are allegedly bike-friendly.
And as a second note, our ride won't illustrate all 4/
of the problems families who want to bike face. My kids are a little older and a little more experienced at reading the street and reading cars. It would be really eye-opening to bike with a family whose kids are preschool-aged.
Still, it will be at least a perspective. 5/
So again, @AldermanSmith43, we'd love to go on a ride with you through your ward. We're available mostly at your convenience (though, with CPS starting next week, on a weekday we'd have to do it in the afternoon).
See you soon? 6/6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Today #HunterBiden filed a suit against the @IRSnews alleging that the IRS unlawfully disclosed his tax return info.
So I thought I'd run through the complaint and take a look. (Note that there may be a big break in tweets--I have a meeting shortly.) 1/storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Central to the suit is an allegation that two IRS agents regularly went on network and cable news to discuss audits and criminal investigations against Biden and that this behavior violated the tax law.
The Code provides for not-insignificant civil damages against those who violate it. (Note that largely this applies to federal and state employees and officers, not normal citizens.) 3/ taxnotes.com/research/feder…
Because I have no idea how it applies to me as a professor. Essentially, the training talks about flagging red flags as a financial institution, and especially in dealing with customers.
But here's the thing: even if the university is covered (which I assume it is? 2/
only the training never explained how?), *I* don't deal with student funds. They don't come to me about withdrawals or money or anything like that.
And that absolutely doesn't mean I don't have some kind of Red Flags Law obligation! 3/
I'm thinking I'm going to live-tweet this complaint about Ensign Peak Advisors. Because on the first page it says this: 1/
That's decidedly not true. Currently, the IRS audits about 0.41% to tax returns. That number shoots up for the very wealthy and the very poor, but for the vast majority of Americans, they're never going to face an audit. 2/ trac.syr.edu/reports/706/#:….
I suspect the audit rate for tax-exempt orgs is similarly miniscule. And for religious auxiliary organizations like EPA? Next to zero (if you can be any more next to zero). 3/
There is literally nothing good that can come from @USNewsEducation ranking elementary and middle schools, but there is a ton of potential harms, ranging from discouraging teachers from teaching where they're needed to convincing wealthy and white parents that 2/
they need to sequester their kids from certain schools and neighborhoods.
This is literally the most inequitable and harmful news I can imagine hearing from @USNewsEducation. 3/
I get that Turley likes writing about things he doesn't understand. And I sincerely hope he enjoyed writing about wealth taxes because he very clearly doesn't have a clue what he's writing about. A short thread: 1/
First thing: it's hard to argue that a 2-3% tax is "soaking the rich." The S&P has a long-term average return about 9%.
Now admittedly, people with >$50m aren't investing *all* of their wealth. But their investing a lot of it. 2/
A 2-3% tax will make their money grow more slowly but, unless they're beyond terrible investors, will neither touch principal nor eliminate asset growth. 3/