NEW BLOG: With the Commons returning today, Meg Russell reviews 13 episodes in Boris Johnson's relationship with parliament during his 13 months as Prime Minister.
This relationship has often been remarkably rocky. But is that sustainable?
7. When the select committees were set up, No. 10 sought to decide who should chair the prestigious Liaison Committee, which questions the Prime Minister.
In 13 months, Johnson has so far cancelled 3 times and appeared only once before the committee.
8. Much of Johnson's period as PM has been dominated by COVID-19, with a need to make policy quickly.
But concerns have been raised about the government's often last-minute decision making using statutory instruments with limited parliamentary oversight.
9. One of the biggest lockdown controversies was over Dominic Cummings' trip to Durham.
This wasn't strictly parliamentary, but Johnson's refusal to respond to criticisms from numerous backbenchers showed a determination to challenge parliamentary norms
10. Another flashpoint was the ending of the 'hybrid' House of Commons.
Opposed by the Commons Procedure Committee and many backbenchers, the ending of MPs' voting rights without their say-so flouted well-established democratic principles.
12. Another controversy about a committee chair related to the Intelligence and Security Committee.
When Julian Lewis beat No. 10's preferred candidate he was stripped of the Conservative whip. But experts agreed this too was a question for parliament.
13. Most recently, Boris Johnson's 36 new Lords appointments have raised controversy. They bring the chamber to over 800, when there was cross-party agreement to reduce its size.
Critics include the Lord Speaker - a former Conservative Cabinet minister.
All in all, Johnson's relationship with parliament has been difficult. He has often sought to proceed without parliamentary approval, even facing down criticism from his own side.
In a parliamentary democracy this is risky. Discontent may now be growing.
Amidst much current talk of the NI Protocol and the ERG, Meg Russell and @james_lisak's forthcoming book sheds new light on this saga.
The ERG voted for the Protocol, as part of Johnson's deal, but very reluctantly. They feared that Brexit would otherwise be lost.
1/
David Frost's subsequent comments are quite well known.
Less so are claims in ERG member Mark Francois' book that the group promised, in private talks with No. 10, to support the deal only on the strict understanding that the NI Protocol would be changed.
2/
Francois says this was 'conveyed very clearly in private to the PM & No 10'.
If true, this means Johnson privately pledged to change the legal agreement he'd just reached before parliament had voted on it, & before selling it in general election 2019 as 'oven ready'.
3/
The Truss premiership has seen economic & political turmoil & a historic Labour lead.
Director Meg Russell argues the current crisis has been built on a foundation of poor constitutional governance and practice, established under her predecessor.
3 legacy characteristics of Johnson’s constitutional regime have been notable in the current crisis:
🚨a strained relationship with the civil service
🚨tension over the role of constitutional regulators 🚨sidelining of parliamentary scrutiny.
2/
Johnson held little regard for constitutional checks and balances, and his approach to constitutional norms and standards appeared central to his downfall in July 2022:
As May recalled in the Commons last week, the DUP were part of that blocking majority.
But there were "others". She refrains from saying who, but voters against included Boris Johnson, Dominic Raab, Priti Patel, Jacob Rees-Mogg & Suella Braverman.
NEW MONITOR: The 80th edition of Monitor was published today. It provides analysis of the last 4 months of constitutional news and contains sections on parliament, elections, devolution, the courts, & the monarchy. It is free and available now: ucl.ac.uk/constitution-u…
2/8 The PARLIAMENT section includes analysis of the fractious relationship between the government and parliament (including its own backbenchers & a record number of Lords defeats), and concerns about the proper scrutiny of delegated legislation.
3/8 The PARLIAMENT section also reports on parliamentary standards, including suggested changes to the Code of Conduct, & the Ryder review.
It discusses plans for the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, which once again appear to be in flux.
This report, on attitudes towards democracy in the UK, is extremely timely, and have been quoted by the press and politicians. This morning, former PM John Major quoted our findings.
Professor Alan Renwick @alanjrenwick introduces key aspects of this project.
First, this report is based on our survey of around 6500 people conducted last summer. This was before the Owen Paterson affair and the “partygate” issue.