This is everything I've been saying about Democrats and their media trying to legitimize political violence, in one pure concentrated headline dose.
This is also a beautiful example of what I said earlier about the Left demanding an exclusive right to violate the social contract. No matter how violent and destructive they get, they're just "protesters" and "demonstrators" looking to "keep themselves safe" from oppressors.
The framing in this left-wing propaganda is clear: If THEY decide the system sucks and rules are broken, they can violate any laws they please. YOU, however, are still fully bound by the social contract they've declared null and void for themselves.
You're so bound by that social contract that you're not even allowed to ask about sending in federal forces to restore order and protect innocent people caught in Democrat riot zones. Basically, the Left can secede from the union at will. Every place it occupies is "autonomous."
Now, read that New York Times headline again VERY carefully and ask yourself: is this constant violence going to get worse, or better, if Dems are rewarded for their hideous behavior with an electoral victory?
Or are you going to be reading headlines about "protesters" and "demonstrators" worried about the threat to their safety from "right-wing" resistance for the rest of your life? Note: ALL resistance to their demands will be classified as "far-right extremism." /end
