Richard Murphy Profile picture
Sep 4, 2020 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Rishi Sunak’s gov’t backed loan schemes mean that more than 1.2 million U.K. businesses - which may be more than 80% of all businesses - are laden with debt and tax bills they have to start repaying next year. That’s when they begin to fail and the recession gets very much worse.
Piling debt burdens on companies to get them through a crisis is one thing. To then think they’ll invest in new employment, products or sustainability when struggling to repay that debt is another. They can’t and won’t. Sunak has built a debt time bomb that will drive recession.
The Office for Budget Responsibility has suggested £33bn of the £53bn of government backed loans to businesses may not be repaid. The gov’t says it expects banks to take failing companies to court to recover the money. They’re literally planning to drive the UK out of business.
The gov’t has a choice to make when it comes to recovering its coronavirus loans to business. It can seek to be repaid and destroy hundreds of thousands of companies, and many more jobs. Or it can convert the loans into shareholdings as the basis for a national wealth fund.
The UK has never had a national wealth fund - which could be the basis for a future National Wealth Service. Converting £53bn of government backed loans to business into shareholdings in the companies that borrowed to get through coronavirus could be the basis for that fund.
Of course no company should be forced to convert its gov’t loan into a shareholding. They should have the right to repay. But if they convert there must be conditions attached. They must publish their accounts, have an employee on the board, pay all their tax and be sustainable.
A National Wealth Service, running a national wealth fund, based on converting coronavirus loans into stakes in businesses could be the basis for the economic recovery the UK needs, and a transformation in the UK business model that is long overdue.
What’s better? A National Wealth Service dedicated to the recovery of UK business from the impact of coronavirus or a government that is planning to force banks to take companies to court to recover these loans when they can’t pay, which will force companies to go bust?
There’s only one business friendly approach to business recovery from the coronavirus crisis and it’s not the one the government is taking. We need a National Wealth Service to manage the stake the government’s now get in UK business for all our sakes, and we need it now.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Murphy

Richard Murphy Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJMurphy

Mar 1
Rishi Sunak is standing outside Downing Street saying that the newly chosen MP for Rochdale, elected yesterday, is the reason why he must crush our democratic freedoms. In the process he appeals to theocracy whilst totally undermining the democracy he claims to support.
The reality is that if there are extremists in the country it is those members of his party who want to create divisions in this country for their own small minded gains.
Worse, he appeals to our history as imperialist colonisers and deniers of freedom to billions to justify his position. If he wished to cause offence, that commentary is clearly intended to deliver it and is utterly blind to the prejudice created by economic and social division in our society,
Read 8 tweets
Feb 10
Quite extraordinarily, leading politicians, including Kier Starmer and Rachel Reeves have in the last few days returned to talking about the country maxing out its credit card, just as David Cameron did in 2015. This is utterly absurd. A thread…
[This is a long thread. If it appears to stop part way through, push the button to ‘see more replies’ and the rest should appear.]
As a matter of fact, a country can’t have a credit card. It’s even questionable whether the UK has a national debt when what politicians describe as such is made up of all our notes and coins plus all the savings accounts that people have with the government.
Read 36 tweets
Feb 9
Labour says it cannot now afford to spend £28 billion a year to deliver the investment in the climate transition that we all know we need. Let’s leave the politics and even the climate bit aside. Let me just look at the affordability bit. A thread….
Labour announced its green investment plan in 2021. And nothing much has changed since then, to be candid. For example, by the time it gets to office inflation will have been and gone.
Growth will also be non-existent then, as it was in 2021. Borrowing will be high, as it was back then. But government borrowing costs will be tumbling this year. They may not be at 2021 levels. But they really won’t be an obstacle to spending.
Read 23 tweets
Jan 14
There is justifiable outrage right now about the fact that the Post Office has been able to prosecute sub-postmasters itself based on data it generated. I get that anger, but we should remember that HM Revenue and Customs do this every day to thousands of people….
[This is a long thread. If it appears to stop part way please press the ‘See more replies’ option below the tweet where it appears to run out and the rest should appear]
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) is, when it comes to imposing fines, quite literally a rule unto itself. It imposes millions of fines a year. Many of them are for not submitting tax returns, and many of those are on people who had no taxable income, or none to declare.
Read 38 tweets
Jan 12
War, of some sort, has begun in the Red Sea and Yemen. The UK is involved. It is likely that there will be action for a while. Ignoring the ethics of the engagement, for now, what are the economic consequences? A thread……
Because this war is going to make passage of the Red Sea more, rather than less, dangerous for the time being it is inevitable that for an unknown period the cost of shipping goods and raw materials from the Far and Middle East will rise. Suez is going to be out of action.
But let’s be clear: the diversion of shipping around the Cape of Good Hope has already begun. And whilst there are costs, and delays, in that they are not on a major scale. Saudi cuts to the price of oil might more than compensate for them.
Read 15 tweets
Jan 7
Without wishing to oversimplify things, there is a binary choice in politics. You can either emphasise the needs of the individual or of society. For the first time in more than a century, the UK's two leading political parties are emphasising the individual and not society.
No wonder so many are disenchanted with politics. Only those who are willing to turn a blind eye to the needs of others are now represented by the mainstream choices presented to us. Anyone who cares about society has no one to represent them.
This is not healthy for politics, democracy, society or those whom it should be supporting, from the young to the elderly, to the sick, to those with a disability, or who are on low pay, or who simply need a helping hand.
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(