THREAD: What has urban planning and the design of our cities got to do with COVID recovery? It turns out -- quite a lot!
Introducing the six-foot city.
By now, most of us are getting used to a new way of moving through cities in the COVID-era -- one in which we endeavour to keep 6 feet between us and every other living thing
But keeping that 6 foot of distance in a dense city isn't always easy.
On most city streets, maintaining six feet of distance is a physical impossibility not because there isn’t enough space, but because the street space is poorly allocated.
About 80% of public space in cities are its streets, an area equivalent to entire cities unto themselves.
Since the start of COVID -- cities all over the world have been tackling the real life version of the Dril tweet, but instead of candles, they're budgeting way too much for on-street parking
Cities like Milan, Paris and London emerged from lockdown by transforming hundreds of miles of streets and creating safe room to walk, bike and take public transportation.
Streets in the time of Covid-19 offer the precious territory needed to relocate more of our inside lives into the outside – and to reimagine our avenues for a new, safer, more inclusive and equitable century.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
QUESTION: "I'm a progressive councillor who wants to support the shift from private cars to a healthy city, what parking policy should I be pushing for?"
This THREAD tries to answer in three parts:
- WHY the need to change
- WHAT to change to
- HOW to help achieve it as a cllr
WHY: Firstly, let's be clear that cut-price parking is a subsidy. If a petrostate charges $1/L for fuel where market rate is $20/L, it's a subsidy of $19/L.
Market rate for a Lambeth parking space is £1200ish per year. The council charges £300, so the subsidy is £900pa per car
LTNs you either love 'em or you hate 'em (for the record, we love them).
But what if one of the reasons you'd been convinced to hate them, turned out not to be true?
Here's a THREAD on new research on LTNs and inequality.
Before we begin, there are a few folks we should introduce.
First up is @RachelAldred -- genius and all round goddess of active travel. She's the Director of the prestigious @Active_ATA.
@RachelAldred@Active_ATA Then there's @ersilia_v -- she's also a part of the wonderful ATA -- focussing on issues of equity and health in transport. She is, put simply, *literally* an expert on equality and transport schemes
If you’ve been paying even slight attention to the debate around low traffic neighbourhoods, you’ll probably have heard something about the argument of traffic on main and residential roads.
This THREAD explains what this means in the contexts of LTNs.
Those in favour of low traffic neighbourhood schemes point out that, over the past 10 years traffic on main roads (A or B roads) has decreased, whereas traffic on residential roads has gone up 70%
They say that this is a result of apps like Google Maps disrupting the ways the roads were designed to be used.
Technology has displaced traffic and the first step in taking control is putting it back on the roads that were designed to handle it. thetimes.co.uk/article/sat-na…
THREAD: These days it's all the rage to talk about getting people out of their cars and onto the street to walk and cycle to their chosen destination.
That conversation is important, but it's also important to understand our baseline.
Luckily, folks (🤓) have found the data...
Let's start with walking.
On average, a person in the UK spends 4250 minutes a year walking.
Don't worry, we did the math (🤓) -- that's almost three full days of their lives!
And if you're a woman between the ages of 30-50 then odds are you walk even more than that. This cohort of our population take the most walks out of all of us.