Homer provides few universal rights for human beings, but one that emerges in the Iliad is the expectation of proper burial, lamentation, and memorial.
The γέρας…θανόντων (Geras thanontôn).
Literally, something like the "honor prize of the dead"
γέρας (geras) is charged in the Iliad. The whole conflict between Agamemnon and Achilles starts when Agamemnon deprives Achilles of Briseis, his γέρας (geras), which is a token of the honor (timê) he has in his community.
Earlier, when Zeus flirts with the idea of saving Sarpedon, Hera tells him that's not right and instead to send him home "where his cousins and relatives will bury him / with a mound and a stele. for this is the geras of the dead"
The Iliad ends with Zeus and Apollo arguing for a proper burial of Hektor despite Hera's and Achilles' wishes. I mean, the rites of burial are a big deal.
They are central to Greek poetry and tragedy, best known perhaps in Sophocles' Antigone where even the asshole Creon is willing to offer proper rites to the nephew who died for the city.
Ok, one more thread on Achilles and Odysseus and how we should read Homer then I promise I will chill
The reason I am profoundly unchill about this is the confusion of rich epic narrative for simple paradigmatic propaganda
Homeric poetry is like a philosophical dialogue, a tragedy, or a piece of visual art: it invites audiences to explore its narrative through their experiences, and to compare their experiences to epic
No one reads, hears, or experiences the epic at any given time and no one comes away with the same conclusions—we bring our experiences and expectations closer together through conversation
At the beginning of the poem, the narrator says he tried super hard to rescue his men, but failed, "because they died thanks to their own recklessnesss" (gr. σφῇσιν ἀτασθαλίῃσιν)
25 lines later, Zeus complains
“Mortals! They are always blaming the gods and saying that evil comes from us when they themselves suffer pain beyond their lot because of their own recklessness.”
To summarize the problem, in a passage in book 9 of the Iliad dual forms--nominal and verbal forms meant for two people--are used for more than two people in overlap with plural forms.
It is easy to dunk on absurd theories that make Achilles a culture warrior representing some kind of prelapsarian ubermensch. Let me tell you why that’s dangerous.
1.Jocular, attacking dismissals let those desperate hatemongers feel persecuted and feeds their sense of righteous outsider position
2.It implies in a damaging way that there is a correct and singular interpretation of an ancient poem (or really any work of art)
Antigone can do great work and the journal is doing a disservice to its other authors by standing behind a bad decision
All of us who move into this new, fast digital space make mistakes trying to respond and adapt. I have have RT'd some bad stuff, said stupid things, and thought better of earlier stances.
A good journal should have a public editorial board and a clear statement on where their funding comes from.