The last few RTs is the point I have been trying to make since yesterday.
1) Atheists cannot claim to be rational when their sole purpose is to simply “ridicule someone for having faith”
2) You cannot claim Hindus are same as Abes when you use different beating sticks.
1) Atheists cannot claim to be rational when their sole purpose is to simply “ridicule someone for having faith”
2) You cannot claim Hindus are same as Abes when you use different beating sticks.
If the atheist is genuinely interested in engaging the Hindu in a debate, it must be in an honest and intellectual plane. Causing offence till a breaking point is reached without any effort to engage constructively makes you no different from an iconoclastic monotheist.
Another acutely disingenuous technique is to treat H reactions as coming from a vacuum and that H have a privilege. This ignores all historical contexts of how the Hinduism has been misrepresented and demonised under the Judeo-Christian lens.
Atheists cannot operate under priors which they acquired from their previous iconoclastic faiths and claim to be doing us a favour with their supposed rationalism and critical analyses.
However very few engage with H in any intellectually serious manner
However very few engage with H in any intellectually serious manner
This is because even you (the atheists) are lazy and would rather expend your effort in cheap meme making and cavil rather than examine the doctrines and maybe attacking them on that.
