An example of what I mean. Inclusive college admission looks inclusive only to a population who went to college.
Many of those who cannot go to college want to find good jobs without having to travel to a college the other side of the country leaving their parents alone.
Many of those who cannot go to college want to find good jobs without having to travel to a college the other side of the country leaving their parents alone.
https://twitter.com/DellAnnaLuca/status/1302216081411657734
Of course, inclusive college admission is better than non-inclusive one. But it’s still pretty non-inclusive, to everyone for whom college is not a viable option, and to all towns and families for whom having their young go away is not a viable option.
Decentralization would probably be more inclusive than any form of inclusive centralization.
Inclusivity, as a gatekeeper, doesn’t mean to ensure that the population you let through is diverse.
It means getting out of the way as much as possible, and only gate when strictly necessary.
Colleges, I’m looking at you.
It means getting out of the way as much as possible, and only gate when strictly necessary.
Colleges, I’m looking at you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
