As I explained on #MorningKombat, I don't look to corporations for moral leadership (unless a cause is baked into the company from the start, like 'fair trade coffee').
I do not take it seriously when Gillette or Nike try this because it's all still part of profit maximization.
Or plain hypocrisy, e.g. Nike uses suspect labor standards in developing nations.
To make the movie, Disney worked with and thanked parts of the Chinese governments in regions responsible for carrying out modern-day genocide against Uighur Muslims.
There is a tendency in modern American life to put the corporation at the center of what we do: it's not merely how we pay our bills, but where we meet friends and have most of our day-to-day socialization, derive our identity and more.
Now we want them to project our ethical preferences, even though these are instruments in no way designed to do such a thing?
I believe in personal advocacy. In sports, I believe in individual athlete advocacy. I do not look to corp or sports orgs for moral leadership.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I cannot overstate how thoughtful Gilbert is through this 45-minute talk. His reflection on his journey, what moves him and how he honors his values is illuminating.
Most folks know I don’t do interviews much anymore and that’s by choice. Delighted to make an exception here.
And yes, that’s Kamaru Usman there in the video. That’s not stock footage. He was there the day we arrived working with Gilbert Burns. We talk all about that as well.
11am ET the video interview with Burns drops on the @morningkombat YouTube channel.
I tracked down the articles cited in UFC President Dana White's anti-media video today related to the UFC's efforts during the coronavirus. Might be worth revisiting them to see what they say and if pushback on them is warranted in light of the very good year UFC had.
1/
It's worth mentioning up front the UFC had two coronavirus experiences.
Once they began working with commissions in May - especially in NV or Abu Dhabi govt - virtually all criticisms went away. At that point, they were working inside updated state medical protocol or beyond.
Before that, however, is when the overwhelming majority of pushback took place.
The first article cited is from March 15, early in the pandemic, following the show in Brazil where there was no Covid testing. Most global sports had stopped at this point.
Also, despite what Aunt Betty's Facebook feed of reheated memes tells you, white supremacist violence is what federal authorities are most concerned about as it relates to terrorism: csis.org/analysis/escal…
As for @maxkellerman's point about 93% of BLM protests being peaceful, it comes from this study by The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED). Read it: acleddata.com/2020/09/03/dem…
Gyms in DC are having success in battling Covid. Many have zero cases of Covid spread to either patrons or staff. The curious part according to one major gym owner in the city is women are returning to the gym at less than half the rate of men. No idea why that'd be so pronounced
When I say gym, I mean fitness, not MMA/BJJ.
Here all gyms have a 100% mask requirement for all patrons/staff at all times. No locker rooms. 25% of normal capacity can train at one time. Touchless entry. Heavy cleaning. Temp checks.
Generally, these are interventions that work.
I mostly lift in my front yard like a convict, but I've gone a few times. Weird vibe, but it's less risk than indoor dining (which I do not do).
It's bizarre mask compliance is so heavily protested. It's a cheap and simple way to get dramatic results. advisory.com/daily-briefing…
I'll have a Dissected out tomorrow trying to make sense of Max-Volkanovski 2.
3 pts:
1. The detail & subtlety of Volk's game is extremely difficult to pick up on in real time 2. 'Watching fights again' as a fact check is pointless 3. Volk's 5th rd performance is truly brilliant
On point 2, we're fact checking wrong. It doesn't matter who did what in terms of scoring when everything is slowed down & assessed.
What matters is what a judge can reasonably identify in real time without much aide. Certain kinds of styles will always benefit from that fact.
I've done the whole "I slowed the fight down and X beat Y" argument. but what does it actually prove in terms of scoring? The judges got it wrong? Maybe they did except if they did it's probably because...they didn't get to watch it more than once or in slow motion.