Delhi HC hears @HarperCollinsIN appeal against ex parte injunction on publication of book "Gunning The Godman: The True Story Behind Asaram Bapu's Conviction".
Senior Adv Kamat reads the Black Friday judgement on rights of the accused.
Kamat continues to read the judgement.
Right to free speech comes with the responsibility that it doesn't harm the reputation of rights of others..: Kamat reads
Article 21 prevails over Article 19(1)(a): Kamat says as he further reads the judgment.
This judgment covers my case. There is one more judgment. My appeal against conviction is an extension of trial. My appeal is listed and they want the book to be released : Kamat
Kamat reads Akhtari Bi vs State of MP.
Publication of the book will vitiate fair trial and result in media trial: Kamat
Kamat reads the Rajasthan HC order that observed that Sanchita had "strong grounds" to chakker her conviction.
When I went to the court, I told about the offending article. I said that there was a judgment against me and appeal was pending. To say that I should have attached the judgment with ye trial court pleadings does not take their case any further: Kamat
Senior Adv Kapil Sibal objects that the entire matter is being re-argued when the same had concluded yesterday.
Senior Adv Kamat continues to refer to judgements.
We now have a copy of the book. The court may take a look.. : Kamat
I'm not looking at it. It wasn't part of the suit : Court
We are examining procedure and whether you went to trial court with clean hands : Court
Sibal points out that in one of the judgements relied upon by Kamat, the court had granted the injunction only till the judgment was pronounced by the trial court.
In Black Friday case, the book was already published. The release of the movie based on the book was stopped till the trial court's judgment. It is not applicable in this case : Sibal
Publication of a book based on public record cannot be stopped : Sibal
They have filed a whole petiton for contempt against the publishing house: Sibal
Court reserves order in @HarperCollinsIN appeal against stay on publication of book on Asaram Bapu's conviction.
I'll deliver the order in a couple of days. Let's see how it goes: Court
Supreme Court heara a PIL seeking a media gag order in the case of Malayali nurse Nimisha Priya, who faces the death penalty in Yemen.
Bench: Justice Vikram Nath and Justice Sandeep Mehta
On August 22, the Court issued notice to Attorney General of India and orally observed that it would pass an order, if any, on Monday (today).
J Nath to Dr. KA Paul: What do want? Do you want nobody should come out and say anything to media....Leaned Attorney has said so that government of India will make nobody brief media. What else you want?
Supreme Court hears the Ranveer Allahabadia case where applications seeking respect for the dignity of disabled
AG R Venkataramani: I called for a meeting of all the stakeholders. There is some affidavit on apology etc. but the difficulty in a meeting of . .
Sr Adv Aparajita: Your lordships all the respondents have apologised.
Justice Kant: Respondent No 6 tried to portray himself as very innocent and then apologised. Anyways are you contemplating some guidelines ?
AG: some are in place we are examining. There cannot be a complete gag and that shall be difficult.
Justice Kant: It cannot be a reaction to a some incident. Policy is for future challenges. That's why we said even if you have some policy regime.. we will get some answers from experts as well.
Justice Kant: We are not shying away from taking strong steps
Goa High Court Bar Association felicitates Chief Justice of India BR Gavai
CJI BR Gavai: Now the registry examines and only in very rare matters we permit oral mentions in the Supreme Court of India. The sitting at Goa as a part of division bench, like in SC you don't know which case is next, in Goa we had variety of litigation...whether it be mining or personal laws.
CJI: I won't detain you all for long. For Goa standards, 7:30 pm is for something else.
CJI: I had decided that I will accept felicitations only at places where I was a member of the Bar or have worked there. This felicitation was to happen on July 19...and was to be the last one.
Supreme Court hears appeal against Allahabad HC order upholding the trial court’s order permitting a court-monitored survey of the Sambhal Masjid
Justice PS Narasimha: It is being argued that this case has to be seen from the lens of Places of Worship Act, 1991
Adv Vishnu Shankar Jain: Just by saying that the act is attracted does not attract the 1991 act.
SC: Question is survey arising out of 1991 act or the ASI act..
Sr Adv Huzefa Ahmadi: They say 1991 act does not apply..HC says there is no bar..I am in appeal and in meanwhile all surveys were stated.
Jain: On the face of it
Justice Narasimha: Yes you have a point that it is not concerned with 1991 act.. and HC gave finding against the Muslim side.. so we need to hear this.. the challenge is pending here...
SC: Mr Jain appearing for Respondent 3 to 8 takes notice of the SLP. It is surprising as to how two appeals have been filed by the same parties.
Jain: In court 4 item 10 has been dismissed.
Ahmadi: it is the mathura case...
SC: we were about to issue notice.
Justice Narasimha: Let us take a look at court 4 item 10 order.. we do not want to pass inconsistent orders. Let it be listed on Monday.
Supreme Court to resume hearing the Bihar SIR case today
Earlier the top court had asked the Election Commission of India @ECISVEEP to upload online the list of 65 lakh voters proposed to be deleted during the ongoing Special Intensive Revision
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR_2025
Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi for the Election Commission of India: We have complied with it letter and spirit. Apart from BLA and panchayat we have also pasted this outside police stations.
#SupremeCourt #BiharSIR_2025
Dwivedi: Anyone wrongly excluded can file form with supporting documents.
Adv Prashant Bhushan: they have complied with the direction but the problem which has arisen