Bar and Bench Profile picture
Sep 10, 2020 14 tweets 11 min read Read on X
#BombayHighCourt hears plea against Media Trial in #SushantSinghRajput case.

Counsels are now making submissions on the regulatory bodies are far as the media is concerned.

In the last hearing, Court had urged the media to show restraint in reporting on the case

#SSRDeathCase
The matter is being heard by a Bench of Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.

#SSRDeathCase
#SushantSinghRajput
#mediatrial
#BombayHighCourt
Bombay HC asks Sr Adv Milind Sathe (for petitioner): Have you made any application (complaint) before News Broadcasting Standards Authority?

This is not a statutory body. They may not be amendable under Article 32. Please decide the larger issues in the case, Sathe urges Court
They should first approach the Press Council and other authorities. Let them look into the matter first: ASG Anil C Singh urges the Court.
On September 3, a coordinate Bench had asked the respondents to file their reply affidavits. It was also expected to exercise restraint in regard to reporting of investigation in a manner that could hamper or prejudice the ongoing investigation...: Court records

#mediatrial #SSR
Bombay HC says: we do not see reason to implead (#RheaChakroborty) the proposed respondent number 12, an accused who is presently in judicial custody.

#SSRDeathCase
#SushantSinghRajput
#mediatrial
#BombayHighCourt
However, the other proposed respondents i.e. NCB, ED, ABP News, India TV, News Nations are impleaded as respondents.

#SSRDeathCase
#SushantSinghRajput
#mediatrial
#BombayHighCourt
We find that none of the Media Groups are respondents in one of the criminal PILs filed in the matter.

All these media groups have been directed to be impleaded in the matter without any delay.

#SSRDeathCase
#SushantSinghRajput
#mediatrial
#BombayHighCourt
Liberty granted to file an additional affidavit to bring on record subsequent events by tomorrow.

Notice issued to added respondents returnable on October 8. All respondents may file their reply affidavits by Sept 30, rejoinder thereto may be filed after

#mediatrial #SSR
#BombayHighCourt: Pendency of these petitions shall not preclude the News Broadcasting Standards Authority to consider complaints that have been received by it and to take appropriate action thereon in accordance with law.

#mediatrial #MediaCircus #SushantSinghRajput
Court adds that the resultant decision of the NBSA may be incorporated in the affidavit to be filed.

#mediatrial
#MediaCircus
#SushantSinghRajput
#BombayHighCourt
#BombayHighCourt adds: We hope and trust that the spirit of the order dated September 3 (to exercise restraint in media reporting in the #SSR case) may be carried out by the media organisations.

#mediatrial
#MediaCircus
#SushantSinghRajput
#SSRDeathCase
PILs against Media Trial in SSR case: Petitioner urges Bombay HC to take up larger issues while regulatory bodies deal with complaints
#SSR #SushantSingRajputDeathCase #SushanthSinghRajput #mediatrial

barandbench.com/news/litigatio…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar and Bench

Bar and Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

Oct 22
Supreme Court resumes hearing the challenge to the Allahabad High Court verdict which struck down the UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004

Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: the judgment goes against the principle of secularism.. it essentially helps that concept by allowing this education..

CJI DY Chandrachud: secularism essentially means to live and let live

Rohatgi: the HC has gone against it.

#Madrasas #SupremeCourtImage
CJI: are you standing by the validity of the act...

ASG KM Natraj: Yes I support the validity of the act. But since constitutionality has been struck down we want to say something. we are defending the legislation but the state did not file a SLP
ASG: when high court struck down the act, we accepted it.

CJI: but you are saying you stand by the act

ASG: yes we filed a counter.. supporting the law. we can support in legal issues

CJI: as a state you have wide powers under section 20 to ensure basic quality of education in madrasas and as the state if you find that this basic level is not followed then you can intervene and that was your stand before the HC and you said act need not be struck down

ASG: the law can be struck down if it is against fundamental rights or its foul of legislative competence. But in this case... it has to be tested only against part III of the constitution.
Read 24 tweets
Oct 21
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear PIL by BJP leader and former Union Minister Subramanian Swamy seeking deletion of the terms "socialist" and "secular" from Preamble to the Indian Constitution Image
The plea challenges 42nd amendment Act which added terms "socialist" and "secular" to describe India in Preamble.

Plea also challenges provisions of Representation of the People Act, 1951, requiring political parties to give undertaking to uphold secularism to get registered.
Bench: Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar Image
Read 19 tweets
Oct 4
#SupremeCourt is hearing appeal against April 8 order of Delhi High Court recognising Central Delhi Court Bar Association as main bar body for Rouse Avenue District Court

Bench: Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih Image
Delhi HC had rejected claim of Rouse Avenue Bar Association, Delhi Rouse Avenue Court Bar Association & Rouse Avenue District Court Bar Association which had all staked their claim to be declared as recognised bar association for Rouse Avenue Court

Read: barandbench.com/news/delhi-hig…
On August 9, while issuing notice, the top court had questioned High Court for entertaining a writ petition and proceeding to recognise lawyers body

Read our report on the last hearing: barandbench.com/news/litigatio…
Read 7 tweets
Oct 3
Appeal against Madras HC judgment which ordered police investigation into the ashram run by Sadguru, Isha Foundation

Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: These are issues of religious freedom. This is a very urgent and serious case. This is about Ishal foundation, there is Sadguru who is very revered and has lakhs of followers.

#Sadguru #SupremeCourtImage
SG: HC should have been very circumspect. This needs your attention

#sadguru
The plea is by Isha Foundation, led by spiritual leader Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev, as a team of 150 police officers descended upon its Thondamuthur ashram on Tuesday.

The search, spearheaded by an Assistant Deputy Superintendent from Coimbatore, came at the directive of the Madras High Court, which requested a comprehensive report on all criminal cases tied to the foundation
Read 20 tweets
Oct 1
Supreme Court to shortly hear case where it said it will issue guidelines for bulldozer-led demolitions and anti-encroachment drives.

#SupremeCourtOfIndia #SupremeCourt #Bulldozer Image
Sr Adv Sanjay Hegde: I am for the fruit seller in Jahangirpuri in whose matter it first reached here. I only urge that it be listed today along with this and tagged.

SC: Okay. Did you tell the other side?
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: I am appearing for three States including Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. Very dispassionately I will give my suggestions, UP has in fact shown the way.

SC: But can being criminal accused be a ground?

SG: No absolutely not. Even for heinous crimes like rape or terrorism. Like my lord said it cannot also be that notice issued stuck one day before, it has to be in advance. Town planning authorities have that provision, lordships may say written be given by registered post so this pasting business stops and it gives 10 days time from date of receipt.
Read 24 tweets
Sep 30
#SupremeCourt hears the case of the son of a dalit daily wager who cracked IIT Dhanbad but could not get admitted since he missed fees payment deadline

CJI: we cannot allow such a young talent boy to go away. He went to jharkhand legal services authority. then he is to chennai legal services and then he is sent to high court. he is a dalit boy being made to run from pillar to post.

Authority: It was not the login at last minute. in mock interview he was told to pay. NIC sent him a SMS and IIT sent him two whatsapp chats to finish payment..

CJI: he is the son of a daily wager.. there is something called.. we know technology is good.

Adv for petitioner: daily wage is 450 rupees. task of arranging 17,500 is a big deal. he collected the money from villagers

CJI: in article 142.. there are some cases we keep the law a little asideImage
CJI: he does all the hard work to get into IIT.. if he had 17,000 why will he not pay..

Adv for authority: but he made login every day

CJI: this shows how diligent he is..
Justice Pardiwala: the seat allotment intimation slip shows that you wanted him to pay and if he did then nothing else was required.. why are you opposing so much !! thats it (to the authority)
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(