We're joining @involveUK this morning for the launch of the #ClimateAssemblyUK report 📖

Over 100 citizens from across the UK met for four weekends of learning, deliberating and voting

Watch the live stream from the @NetZeroUK home page
2/ The assembly was established by six select committees to inform their work on how the UK can meet its target of net zero by 2050.

It is designed to strengthen and support decision making in parliament by providing a valuable body of evidence about the views of the public.
3/ The 108 assembly members who committed nearly 60 hours to the process, came from “all walks of life and across the UK”. The youngest was 16 and the oldest 79, including people who work for the NHS, business owners, full time carers and many others.
4/ Citizens' assemblies help to make sure that everyone has the best possible information about public preferences to inform decision making. Speaking at the launch @AlokSharma_RDG said "the climate assembly has shown the benefits of working with a dedicated group".
5/ An opportunity to hear from some members of #ClimateAssemblyUK including Ibrahim "If done well a citizens assembly can be a true reflection of the thoughts and wishes of the population of the country, and generally the positions tend to be more acceptable to the public."
6/ @Dunne4Ludlow Chair of the @CommonsEAC points to the value of a citizens' assembly for select committees. They provide an informed set of proposals and recommendations from members of the public to help with committee deliberations.
7/ You can read the report and catch the recorded launch event if you missed it on the @NetZeroUK website

8/ The Unit's work on deliberative democracy is run by our Deputy Director @alanjrenwick who was also on the Advisory Panel for #ClimateAssemblyUK

You can see more of our work on this topcic, and others, on our website

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Constitution Unit

Constitution Unit Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConUnit_UCL

Oct 20, 2022
So, another leadership contest for another new Prime Minister.

🧵Some key constitutional reminders:

1. The last contest was triggered by serious concerns about constitutional standards under the Johnson government.

Five questions for the candidates.

2. The financial and political crisis generated by Truss had constitutional roots built on Johnson's record.

She demonstrated the risks of ignoring appropriate checks and balances: sidelining expert officials and regulators, and shutting out her own MPs.

3. Truss's predecessor routinely demonstrated impatience with constitutional norms, and risked normalising constitutional controversy.

Read 6 tweets
Oct 5, 2022
The Truss premiership has seen economic & political turmoil & a historic Labour lead.

Director Meg Russell argues the current crisis has been built on a foundation of poor constitutional governance and practice, established under her predecessor.


3 legacy characteristics of Johnson’s constitutional regime have been notable in the current crisis:

🚨a strained relationship with the civil service
🚨tension over the role of constitutional regulators 🚨sidelining of parliamentary scrutiny.

Johnson held little regard for constitutional checks and balances, and his approach to constitutional norms and standards appeared central to his downfall in July 2022:


Read 9 tweets
May 16, 2022
The Northern Ireland #Protocol is top of the news. So how did we get here? The Unit's Meg Russell and @james_lisak explore.

@theresa_may as PM negotiated a Brexit deal that sought to avoid most of these problems. But it was blocked. Who by?


As May recalled in the Commons last week, the DUP were part of that blocking majority.

But there were "others". She refrains from saying who, but voters against included Boris Johnson, Dominic Raab, Priti Patel, Jacob Rees-Mogg & Suella Braverman.


May was forced out by the Brexit hardliners. Johnson took over and pledged to "get Brexit done". 🤔

Yes, confusing. But he meant a different Brexit. Perhaps even a no-deal Brexit.

Johnson and David Frost briefed that they were prepared for this.


Read 13 tweets
Mar 16, 2022
NEW MONITOR: The 80th edition of Monitor was published today. It provides analysis of the last 4 months of constitutional news and contains sections on parliament, elections, devolution, the courts, & the monarchy. It is free and available now:
2/8 The PARLIAMENT section includes analysis of the fractious relationship between the government and parliament (including its own backbenchers & a record number of Lords defeats), and concerns about the proper scrutiny of delegated legislation.
3/8 The PARLIAMENT section also reports on parliamentary standards, including suggested changes to the Code of Conduct, & the Ryder review.
It discusses plans for the Restoration and Renewal of the Palace of Westminster, which once again appear to be in flux.
Read 9 tweets
Feb 10, 2022
Starting shortly! The Unit is holding a fascinating seminar on: What Kind of Democracy Do People Want?

Our panel
Chair: Professor Meg Russell
Professor Meg Russell begins the seminar introducing our new report: ucl.ac.uk/constitution-u…

This report, on attitudes towards democracy in the UK, is extremely timely, and have been quoted by the press and politicians. This morning, former PM John Major quoted our findings.
Professor Alan Renwick @alanjrenwick introduces key aspects of this project.

First, this report is based on our survey of around 6500 people conducted last summer. This was before the Owen Paterson affair and the “partygate” issue.
Read 17 tweets
Feb 10, 2022
NEW BLOG: What Kind of Democracy Do People Want? Putting our findings in context

Following last month's publication of the first report of the Democracy in the UK after Brexit project, @cleaver_james asks how its findings compare with previous research.

The report's findings about people's satisfaction with democracy and their trust in certain institutions chime with existing scholarship.

This is partly due to the well-established nature of this field, and partly due to the similar questions asked of survey respondents.
In contrast, the emphasis respondents placed on integrity at the expense of delivery is more novel.

The survey on which this report was based asked people to engage with trade-offs, which removed the risk of respondents simply agreeing with the statement before them.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!