Are examination result on cumulative basis? : Court
Prof Ajay Arora will explain this: Adv M Rupal
We have submitted everything. It is based on the average of all students : Prof Arora
Adv Amir Pasrich: Students are assessed individually. Now they are saying there is standard deviation and averaging out.
Adv Pasrich appears for a student who has obtained provisional admission in a foreign university.
The way we calculate the result is in the affidavit: Prof Arora.
Court breaks for 10 mins to enable the members of the Grievance Redressal Committee to go through DU's affidavit.
Hearing resumes.
We have to see if cumulative or comparative grade point system is followed: Court
There was no dispute that results in a confidential manner was to be sent for PG students/LLB students because there was no grading for them: Senior Adv BB Gupta from Grievance Redressal Committee
It was never agreed upon before the Court. It was decided in a meeting of the GRC: Adv Rupal for DU
The mins were recorded with the consent of all. It was decided that the result of PG/LLB students would be complied by September 10 : Adv Kamal Gupta from GRC
As per the earlier order that Mr BB Gupta is referring to, we said we would start evaluation in 15 days. We can't declare the results on the same day: Adv Rupal
You were to forward the answer sheets on the same day on the exam: Court
Answer sheets were to be collected from portal and email: Adv Rupal
We're not saying that were started after 15 days: Adv Rupal
Prof DS Rawat: It is done by Director, Computer Centre. Distribution has already started.
Assuming it took you two days to sort out the answer sheets, did you send them for evaluation on the third day? : Court
Papers were sent after Aug 31: Court is informed
I joined on August 26 only: Prof Rawat
We are concerned with the university: Court
The single judge had ordered that the papers had to be sent for evaluation simultaneously: Senior Adv Gupta
We had asked that all concerned officials must join the hearing: Court
Prof Rawat calls another DU official to ask as to when the evaluation of papers started.
Is this how we are going to conduct our hearing? : Court
What should we do now? : Court
Can Prof Sanjeev Singh join the hearing? : Adv Rupal asks DU official.
He is not able to join : Prof Rawat
We took a break so that everyone could join. This is most unacceptable: Court
The link was sent : Adv Rupal
Please answer of Prof Sanjeev can join? : Adv Rupal asks Prof Rawat
I will ask: Prof Rawat
Then you say you are getting adverse publicity. You do it yourself: Court
In your affidavit you talk about "combined result". Does it refer to a single student or the entire batch? : Court
The evaluation system was changed in 2017 by the Vice chancellor: Senior Adv BB Gupta
For students prior to 2017, there is no system in grading system: Court notes.
So the new evaluation only applies to students who entered in 2019 and not others: Court
Therefore, the old procedure of totalling the marks of each student would apply : Court
The present final year joined in 2017. So now can confidential results be declared for students going abroad? : Court
For those PG students who want to go abroad, there is no issue. 8 Students have come so far: Adv Rupal
For UG, just for confidential results, we can issue tentative results subject to correction, based on past performance. 188 students are there from almost every streams: Adv Rupal
The result would be sent directly to the foreign university: Adv Rupal
Avg of all semester will come as marks for the final semester. We have approved a format. It will be for students who have no black paper and have appeared in all OBE..it can be sent to foreign universities: Prof Rawat
We need a day's time to see if we are within the permissible limits. We are trying to help the students: Adv Rupal
The idea is to take the matter to its logical conclusion: Court
We have tried to review ourselves and give best possible help: Adv Rupal
At least for LLB students, there is no question of comparative marking. For LLB/PG , there are only 8. This can be done: Court
The examiners are already hard pressed. Our endeavour is to do it ASAP: Adv Rupal
For PG, teachers are already expedited the process: Prof Rawat
There is a particular format of Cambridge. I need to upload the comfort letter : Adv Sukhija for a student.
Confidential result cannot be shared. It has to go directly to the foreign university : Court
I need them to indicate the date of declaration of result: Adv Sukhija
We can't say when that would be : Adv Rupal
Cambridge gave me September 19 as last date to upload the letter. They say that the date of result is not mentioned and it should be before October 10: Adv Sukhija
You have to have a macro view. You have to be aware of the ground realities also: Court
We will try to work out and come with a proposal: Adv Rupal
Can you do it (declare result) before Oct 10?: Court
Give us time: Adv Rupal
Let the university not sent out further comfort letter. Some damage seems to have been done by letters which state that results will come in October end : Adv Kamal Gupta
I will take clarification from DU on how students are being evaluated: Adv Rupal
Ask him now.. he' s here: Court
On Monday we will clarify: Adv Rupal
I don't have this information right now : Prof Rawat
His is Acting Dean of Examination. Prof Gupta is on leave : Adv Rupal
I will make sure that everyone is present on Monday : Adv Rupal
Court begins dictating the order.
Court records the submissions and the affidavit filed by DU.
Students have been informed that DU will send a comfort letter to the foreign universities concerned: Court records
Comfort letter for 46 students were dispatched without factoring in the final draft by the GRC : Court
Even the work "open" was misspelt as "pen book examination": Adv Pasrich
180 UG students have applied for comfort letters. They are in different streams: Court records
Some discussion has taken place on sending a provisional result.. : Court records.
Court may not record it today as we are still discussing it: Adv Rupal
Court records that the officials are discussing with the issue and trying to arrive at a proposal.
The aspect of cumulative grade point average vis a vis comparative grade point avg is not clear. Appropriate light shall be thrown on the next date of hearing: Court
Things will be resolved by September 14. We are equally anxious: Court tells Adv Sukhija
Hearing adjourned till Monday, September 14.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#SupremeCourt to shortly deliver judgment on this significant issue
The court to hand down verdict in the suo motu case concerning visually impaired in judicial services
The genesis of the case lies in the rules governing judicial appointments in Madhya Pradesh which contained discriminatory language that prevented blind individuals from becoming judges.
This exclusion was challenged after a mother, whose visually impaired child aspired to the judiciary, wrote to the court, leading to a court-initiated public interest litigation.
Justice R Mahadevan: we have treated it as the most important case. We have touched upon constitutional framework also and institutional disability jurisprudence...
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by Ranveer Allahabadia and Ashish Chanchlani in the case over remarks made in #indiasgotlatent show
Allahabadia and Chanchlani were protected from arrest in the last hearing
@BeerBicepsGuy
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud: We have moved an application. We are seeking lifting of one part of the order which refrained him from airing his shows etc. He has no sense of humour at all.. but he has 280 employees and it is his livelihood. It can be ordered that let no profane words be uttered.
SG: this is an isolated case. It is not vulgar but it is perverse. I saw the show also out of curiosity.. humour is one thing, vulgarity is one thing, and perversity is another level. Leave alone man and woman.. me and AG cannot see it together. The judges cannot see it together. Let him stay quiet for sometime .. Assam called him. He did not come.
Supreme Court to hear plea by Ranveer Allahabadia challenging multiple FIRs filed against him after he made certain remarks on India's Got Latent show
@BeerBicepsGuy #SupremeCourt #Indiasgotlatent
Dr Abhinav Chandrachud: Petitioner has got death threats.. 5 lakh reward for cutting his tongue. Former wrestler says he should not be spared in any party we meet him. All for a 10 second clip.
Are you defending the language used: Justice Surya Kant
Dr Chandrachud: As an officer of the court I am disgusted at the language used.
SC: so what are the parameters of obscenity and vulgarity. In the society which has some self evolved values and when we behave within those parameters we want to know what are the parameters of Indian society According to the petitioner.
Supreme Court hears the plea by Association of Democratic Reforms
CJI Sanjiv Khanna: what is this for ?
Adv Prashant Bhushan: we are Seeking that the procedure which ECI needs to adopt as per supreme Court judgment is in consonance with their standard operating protocol. What we want is that somebody should examine the software and the hardware of the EVMs in order to see if the software and hardware has any element of manipulation or not
CJI: Once votes are counted the paper trails are taken out or it's still there
Bhushan: they should maintain the paper trail
Sr Adv Devadatta Kamath: I appear for Sarva mitter. The entire data was wiped out. the evms on which polling was done should be tested.
CJI: to be done within seven days.. and the machine could be as per candidate choice and the burnt memory could be checked and verified.
Sr Adv Kamath: dummy units are checked not real ones. Here a fresh poll is being conducted and 40,000 being spent for verifying and checking each machine and the payment is to be by the candidate and then it's just a mock poll!
Supreme Court hears PIL by National Federation of Indian Women over the alleged increase in cases of Lynching and MobViolence, particularly by 'CowVigilantes'
Justice BR Gavai: Issue has already concluded. Can we revive that by way of another writ
Adv Nizamuddin Pasha: But the issue is when private individuals are given police powers to seize vehicles and nab people for cattle smuggling.. this is how police powers are given to private agencies. Attitude of state machinery needs to be looked at and see how brazen it is.. some kind of oversight from this court will help
Justice Gavai: You can challenge those notifications before the court
Pasha: It exists across states and is across spectrum
SG Tushar Mehta: I appear for the Union. If such things are happening it can be challenged
Pasha: 13 states follow this rule
Justice Gavai: is there are a direction in this case by us to all states .
SG: On Nov 6,2024, 6 states as selected by petitioner were asked to respond.
Pasha: and thereafter all states and UTs were made a part. Oct 28,2023, was the plea to implead all States and UTs . They have replied also
Should former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain granted interim bail in a case related to Delhi riots so that he may campaign for the upcoming Delhi Assembly polls as an All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) candidate?
#SupremeCourt to hear @AamAadmiParty @aimim_national
The case comes to a three-judge bench after Justice Pankaj Mithal ruled that bail should be denied and Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah stated that bail should be granted #TahirHussain #DelhiElection2025
Hearing to commence at 10:30 am #SupremeCourtofIndia