Are examination result on cumulative basis? : Court
Prof Ajay Arora will explain this: Adv M Rupal
We have submitted everything. It is based on the average of all students : Prof Arora
Adv Amir Pasrich: Students are assessed individually. Now they are saying there is standard deviation and averaging out.
Adv Pasrich appears for a student who has obtained provisional admission in a foreign university.
The way we calculate the result is in the affidavit: Prof Arora.
Court breaks for 10 mins to enable the members of the Grievance Redressal Committee to go through DU's affidavit.
Hearing resumes.
We have to see if cumulative or comparative grade point system is followed: Court
There was no dispute that results in a confidential manner was to be sent for PG students/LLB students because there was no grading for them: Senior Adv BB Gupta from Grievance Redressal Committee
It was never agreed upon before the Court. It was decided in a meeting of the GRC: Adv Rupal for DU
The mins were recorded with the consent of all. It was decided that the result of PG/LLB students would be complied by September 10 : Adv Kamal Gupta from GRC
As per the earlier order that Mr BB Gupta is referring to, we said we would start evaluation in 15 days. We can't declare the results on the same day: Adv Rupal
You were to forward the answer sheets on the same day on the exam: Court
Answer sheets were to be collected from portal and email: Adv Rupal
We're not saying that were started after 15 days: Adv Rupal
Prof DS Rawat: It is done by Director, Computer Centre. Distribution has already started.
Assuming it took you two days to sort out the answer sheets, did you send them for evaluation on the third day? : Court
Papers were sent after Aug 31: Court is informed
I joined on August 26 only: Prof Rawat
We are concerned with the university: Court
The single judge had ordered that the papers had to be sent for evaluation simultaneously: Senior Adv Gupta
We had asked that all concerned officials must join the hearing: Court
Prof Rawat calls another DU official to ask as to when the evaluation of papers started.
Is this how we are going to conduct our hearing? : Court
What should we do now? : Court
Can Prof Sanjeev Singh join the hearing? : Adv Rupal asks DU official.
He is not able to join : Prof Rawat
We took a break so that everyone could join. This is most unacceptable: Court
The link was sent : Adv Rupal
Please answer of Prof Sanjeev can join? : Adv Rupal asks Prof Rawat
I will ask: Prof Rawat
Then you say you are getting adverse publicity. You do it yourself: Court
In your affidavit you talk about "combined result". Does it refer to a single student or the entire batch? : Court
The evaluation system was changed in 2017 by the Vice chancellor: Senior Adv BB Gupta
For students prior to 2017, there is no system in grading system: Court notes.
So the new evaluation only applies to students who entered in 2019 and not others: Court
Therefore, the old procedure of totalling the marks of each student would apply : Court
The present final year joined in 2017. So now can confidential results be declared for students going abroad? : Court
For those PG students who want to go abroad, there is no issue. 8 Students have come so far: Adv Rupal
For UG, just for confidential results, we can issue tentative results subject to correction, based on past performance. 188 students are there from almost every streams: Adv Rupal
The result would be sent directly to the foreign university: Adv Rupal
Avg of all semester will come as marks for the final semester. We have approved a format. It will be for students who have no black paper and have appeared in all OBE..it can be sent to foreign universities: Prof Rawat
We need a day's time to see if we are within the permissible limits. We are trying to help the students: Adv Rupal
The idea is to take the matter to its logical conclusion: Court
We have tried to review ourselves and give best possible help: Adv Rupal
At least for LLB students, there is no question of comparative marking. For LLB/PG , there are only 8. This can be done: Court
The examiners are already hard pressed. Our endeavour is to do it ASAP: Adv Rupal
For PG, teachers are already expedited the process: Prof Rawat
There is a particular format of Cambridge. I need to upload the comfort letter : Adv Sukhija for a student.
Confidential result cannot be shared. It has to go directly to the foreign university : Court
I need them to indicate the date of declaration of result: Adv Sukhija
We can't say when that would be : Adv Rupal
Cambridge gave me September 19 as last date to upload the letter. They say that the date of result is not mentioned and it should be before October 10: Adv Sukhija
You have to have a macro view. You have to be aware of the ground realities also: Court
We will try to work out and come with a proposal: Adv Rupal
Can you do it (declare result) before Oct 10?: Court
Give us time: Adv Rupal
Let the university not sent out further comfort letter. Some damage seems to have been done by letters which state that results will come in October end : Adv Kamal Gupta
I will take clarification from DU on how students are being evaluated: Adv Rupal
Ask him now.. he' s here: Court
On Monday we will clarify: Adv Rupal
I don't have this information right now : Prof Rawat
His is Acting Dean of Examination. Prof Gupta is on leave : Adv Rupal
I will make sure that everyone is present on Monday : Adv Rupal
Court begins dictating the order.
Court records the submissions and the affidavit filed by DU.
Students have been informed that DU will send a comfort letter to the foreign universities concerned: Court records
Comfort letter for 46 students were dispatched without factoring in the final draft by the GRC : Court
Even the work "open" was misspelt as "pen book examination": Adv Pasrich
180 UG students have applied for comfort letters. They are in different streams: Court records
Some discussion has taken place on sending a provisional result.. : Court records.
Court may not record it today as we are still discussing it: Adv Rupal
Court records that the officials are discussing with the issue and trying to arrive at a proposal.
The aspect of cumulative grade point average vis a vis comparative grade point avg is not clear. Appropriate light shall be thrown on the next date of hearing: Court
Things will be resolved by September 14. We are equally anxious: Court tells Adv Sukhija
Hearing adjourned till Monday, September 14.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Supreme Court resumes hearing the challenge to the Allahabad High Court verdict which struck down the UP Board of Madarsa Education Act, 2004
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: the judgment goes against the principle of secularism.. it essentially helps that concept by allowing this education..
CJI DY Chandrachud: secularism essentially means to live and let live
Rohatgi: the HC has gone against it.
#Madrasas #SupremeCourt
CJI: are you standing by the validity of the act...
ASG KM Natraj: Yes I support the validity of the act. But since constitutionality has been struck down we want to say something. we are defending the legislation but the state did not file a SLP
ASG: when high court struck down the act, we accepted it.
CJI: but you are saying you stand by the act
ASG: yes we filed a counter.. supporting the law. we can support in legal issues
CJI: as a state you have wide powers under section 20 to ensure basic quality of education in madrasas and as the state if you find that this basic level is not followed then you can intervene and that was your stand before the HC and you said act need not be struck down
ASG: the law can be struck down if it is against fundamental rights or its foul of legislative competence. But in this case... it has to be tested only against part III of the constitution.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear PIL by BJP leader and former Union Minister Subramanian Swamy seeking deletion of the terms "socialist" and "secular" from Preamble to the Indian Constitution
The plea challenges 42nd amendment Act which added terms "socialist" and "secular" to describe India in Preamble.
Plea also challenges provisions of Representation of the People Act, 1951, requiring political parties to give undertaking to uphold secularism to get registered.
Bench: Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar
#SupremeCourt is hearing appeal against April 8 order of Delhi High Court recognising Central Delhi Court Bar Association as main bar body for Rouse Avenue District Court
Bench: Justice Abhay S Oka and Justice Augustine George Masih
Delhi HC had rejected claim of Rouse Avenue Bar Association, Delhi Rouse Avenue Court Bar Association & Rouse Avenue District Court Bar Association which had all staked their claim to be declared as recognised bar association for Rouse Avenue Court
Appeal against Madras HC judgment which ordered police investigation into the ashram run by Sadguru, Isha Foundation
Sr Adv Mukul Rohatgi: These are issues of religious freedom. This is a very urgent and serious case. This is about Ishal foundation, there is Sadguru who is very revered and has lakhs of followers.
#Sadguru #SupremeCourt
SG: HC should have been very circumspect. This needs your attention
#sadguru
The plea is by Isha Foundation, led by spiritual leader Sadhguru Jaggi Vasudev, as a team of 150 police officers descended upon its Thondamuthur ashram on Tuesday.
The search, spearheaded by an Assistant Deputy Superintendent from Coimbatore, came at the directive of the Madras High Court, which requested a comprehensive report on all criminal cases tied to the foundation
Supreme Court to shortly hear case where it said it will issue guidelines for bulldozer-led demolitions and anti-encroachment drives.
#SupremeCourtOfIndia #SupremeCourt #Bulldozer
Sr Adv Sanjay Hegde: I am for the fruit seller in Jahangirpuri in whose matter it first reached here. I only urge that it be listed today along with this and tagged.
SC: Okay. Did you tell the other side?
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta: I am appearing for three States including Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. Very dispassionately I will give my suggestions, UP has in fact shown the way.
SC: But can being criminal accused be a ground?
SG: No absolutely not. Even for heinous crimes like rape or terrorism. Like my lord said it cannot also be that notice issued stuck one day before, it has to be in advance. Town planning authorities have that provision, lordships may say written be given by registered post so this pasting business stops and it gives 10 days time from date of receipt.
#SupremeCourt hears the case of the son of a dalit daily wager who cracked IIT Dhanbad but could not get admitted since he missed fees payment deadline
CJI: we cannot allow such a young talent boy to go away. He went to jharkhand legal services authority. then he is to chennai legal services and then he is sent to high court. he is a dalit boy being made to run from pillar to post.
Authority: It was not the login at last minute. in mock interview he was told to pay. NIC sent him a SMS and IIT sent him two whatsapp chats to finish payment..
CJI: he is the son of a daily wager.. there is something called.. we know technology is good.
Adv for petitioner: daily wage is 450 rupees. task of arranging 17,500 is a big deal. he collected the money from villagers
CJI: in article 142.. there are some cases we keep the law a little aside
CJI: he does all the hard work to get into IIT.. if he had 17,000 why will he not pay..
Adv for authority: but he made login every day
CJI: this shows how diligent he is..
Justice Pardiwala: the seat allotment intimation slip shows that you wanted him to pay and if he did then nothing else was required.. why are you opposing so much !! thats it (to the authority)