In 1872, the Empire of Japan declared that King Shô Tai of the Kingdom of Ryûkyû was to be no longer the king of a kingdom, but a lord of a domain within Japan. He was given a mansion here, at Mochizaka (today Chiyoda-ku Fujimi 1-chôme).
Nothing survives of the mansion today, so far as I know, or even marks the site. Banana leaves and palm trees give a tropical sense, evocative of Ryukyu, but today these are the grounds of the Filipino Embassy; I'm not sure exactly where the Shô family mansion had been.
Meanwhile, about half an hour's walk to the southwest, in Kioi-chô, we find the "Classic House at Akasaka Prince Hotel," identified as the former residence of Prince Kitashirakawa, and ever so quietly also identified as having been built for the former Korean royal family.
As the sign here says, a residence for Prince Kitashirakawa was built on the site in 1884. A new residence was then built in 1930, for the former royal family of Korea (which psst psst had been annexed and colonized).
I'm sure there's a large element of just happenstance, or other factors, involved, but at the same time I'm somehow not surprised that the Korean mansion survives (or has been rebuilt?), and the Ryukyuan one doesn't even have a historical marker.
The same is generally true of both primary and secondary sources: a ton more historical documents rel. to Japan-Korea relations survive than those pertaining to Japan-Ryukyu, and there's a ton more research.
Korea is considered a major element of "history of Japanese foreign relations," and Ryukyu an odd side-case, a curiosity.
There are many rational reasons for this. But, even so, nevertheless, it is a thing.
*Former Korean mansion / now, Akasaka Prince Hotel Classic House: 〒102-0094 東京都千代田区紀尾井町1−2 (g.page/akasakaprince?…)
*headdesk* Read the sign before you hit Tweet, Travis.
It's Mochinoki-zaka.
God, I'm bad at threads 😅. Thanks to @sherryberry100 for helping me realize that I might share the newspaper article where I learned about this, also:
From a 1993 reprinting of the Tokyo Nichinichi Shimbun (vol 1), ostensibly(?) as it originally appeared in print on 3 Oct 1872:
And as retyped up, reformatted, in the 1934 Shinbun Shûsei Meiji hennenshi (vol. 1, p497):
If I am understanding the article correctly, Saga domain retainer Shima Yoshitake 島義勇 sold the house (along with tatami and furnishings) to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for 3000 yen; the Ministry then "granted" or "bestowed" 下賜 the house to (former king) Shô Tai.
Shima appears to have been something of a big deal, I suppose. There are statues of him today in both Saga and Sapporo.
Why it was his mansion that was purchased and then given to Shô Tai, though, if there was any profound reason at all, is unclear.
If anyone knows differently, i.e. if I've misinterpreted the newspaper article, or anything else here, please let me know :) thanks.
Ugh. Again, it's Mochinoki-zaka. Apologies. 😓
My sincere thanks to Ōzato-sensei of the Hōsei University Okinawan Studies Center, who some years ago pointed out the window of the Center, in the general direction of Kudanshita, and told me the former site of the mansion was over there somewhere.
Somehow, for whatever reason, I never expected to find out any more specifically where it was. The newspaper article came as a surprise.
I would love to investigate in future just what the mansion was like, and what the Shō family's life as kazoku (nobles) in Imp Japan was like... I wonder what materials might survive that might shed light on this.
But, that's a project for another day. First I have to finish all the projects I'm already juggling!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Feeling helpless and hopeless today, and very much on the verge of tears.
This coming Monday, May 15, marks the 50th anniversary of Okinawa's "reversion" to Japanese governance, i.e. the end of the formal American Occupation of Okinawa.
The Tokyo International Forum is one of several places holding exhibits in connection with this history.
For fifty years, Okinawans have been protesting, in great numbers, in numerous forms and venues, and yet the military bases are still there. The toxic spills, the plane crashes, the occupation of Okinawan land, the devastation of the environment, the countless incidents of SA.
Very interesting. Living here in Japan for the last few years, I've begun to think more and more about how, even when we know dictionary definitions, and are fluent enough to get by well, there is still so much that can be so elusive as to the connotations or nuances of words...
Mishima Kitan here informs us that when women / fem-presenting people use boku 僕 as their first-person pronoun ("I"), it can be read as butch, queer, trans, and/or as cringe, as someone who is too influenced by pop culture and/or trying too hard to create a persona for themself.
I never thought it had this connotation, this sense. To me, if I heard a woman use "boku," I would have simply thought they were being a little strong, a little independent. Giving off a slightly boyish, assertive, feminist energy, in a good way.
While the museum did not allow photos in the main portion of the exhibit space, it was mostly just reproductions anyway - so, if I take the time to go to NDL and look up the microfilm, I can see (and get a printout copy of!) these very same materials anyway.
One thing that was particularly interesting, though not surprising, was to see just how straightforwardly stated many of the headlines were. And, also, to see what they were juxtaposed with.
@Docstockk Others have surely answered already, but I'll add to the pack. (1) Read around. A very quick Google search will reveal plenty of pages explaining that, yes, generally it does mean "I'm fine with either." Why? Well, I'll speak for myself, and give two reasons.
@Docstockk First, because "they" is a neutral pronoun. It applies to everyone. "Someone lost their wallet." "I wonder who they are." Second, because some people don't feel 100% fully comfortable with the social constructs of "a man" or "a woman" and want to express that.
@Docstockk Some people feel that being called "they" instead of he or she helps reinforce their own feeling that they are being seen as a person first, an individual, and not first and foremost as representative of a social category - man or woman.
Visited Tobu World Square yesterday - a theme park near Nikko featuring models of famous buildings from around the world. Kind of cheesy, I guess, but kind of cool. My main purpose in going, ofc, was my interest in seeing their new model of Sui gusuku (Shuri castle).
Very much looking forward to visiting Shuri again. We'll see when that ends up happening.
Some sites of modern Japan: the Tokyo National Museum, Akasaka Palace, Imperial Hotel (Frank Lloyd Wright), and Tokyo Station.
The quiet, unspoken, pressure to embody gender norms, to try to fit in and seem like a typical, "normal" guy/man/bro/dude, even when, who knows, maybe all the other guys are also pretending or self-policing in the same way, to fit in with you.
Even when you know the guys and they'd probably be totally cool with you being a diff sort of guy to them, I'm always sort of curious, how many of them aren't actually that sort of guy either? We all just sort of play along to try to fit in, but maybe *all* of us are pretending?
If only we could all drop the act all at once. I'm sure there's a movie/TV reference I could reference here, but I'm blanking. But surely, there's one where everyone is standing around, brewskis in hand, talking about football, and then everyone sort of eyes one another and then