pro-Biden thugs in the streets to provoke “violence and vandalism.” The group prepped how to call for nationwide work stoppages so they can “count every ballot” way beyond Election Day. In one scenario, Biden only agrees to concede if Congress promises to eliminate Electoral...
College, give DC statehood and other Dem Party demands. This plan has full support of Big Tech and very deep pockets. Pay attention, it’s real amgreatness.com/2020/09/10/the…
Google, Facebook, Twitter in what can only be described as egregious election interference will censor content that raises legit concerns over mail in ballots or voter fraud. wsj.com/articles/twitt…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Ok 6th appellate court had wrong link for oral arguments in Fox/Croft Whitmer fednapping hoax.
Croft atty up 1st. He will discuss court's decision to prevent jury from seeing hundreds of incriminating comms btw FBI handlers and informants that demonstrated the entrapment scheme
Croft atty: "The judge really put the bar down on that."(There were roughly 200+ messages the defense wanted to enter into evidence. Judge said no.)
Croft points to appellate court ruling that supports disclosure of those messages to jury. "It is made for this case, where entrapment is so critical where you do have communication between govt agents."
2 Trump, one Biden judge on the panel btw.
Judge asks which messages should have been admitted. "All 3 informants?" Referring to Dan Chappel, Steve Robeson, and Jenny Plunk.
"Yes your honor."
Chappel and Robeson were primarily responsible for luring the targets into the trap, paying for food/booze/lodging, scheduling "training" camps and most importantly, organizing the "reconnaissance" trip to Whitmer's summer cottage in Sept 2020.
Not only is Judge Cannon exposing DOJ corruption, it appears she is about to open a can of whoop ass on DC court, namely ex chief Judge Beryl Howell.
Cannon seems poised to release info related to Howell's order piercing atty-client privilege btw Trump and attorney Evan Corcoran
Howell consented to Smith's request to pierce that privilege under the crime fraud exception. Howell claimed there was enough evidence of a crime (!) to justify taking the extraordinary step of giving Smith access to all of Corcoran's files on Trump.
During last month's hearing, Cannon expressed frustration that she was gradually learning about grand jury proceedings/materials out of DC. She called the process "opaque" and doubted DOJ (Bratt) argument that defense all they needed.
NEW: White House visitor log shows that David Ferriero, Obama-appointed national archivist involved in the early stages of the "classified documents" scheme against Trump, met with Biden's WH counsel Dana Remus twice at the White House in Sept 2021:
Ferriero called J6 the "worst day of his life" and started threatening Team Trump in the summer of 2021 with making a criminal referral to DOJ over alleged "destroyed" presidential records.
Dana Remus worked for Obama's DOJ then went to Obama Foundation where she served as counsel to Michelle Obama.
Barack Obama officiated her 2018 wedding.
The day before Ferriero's Sept 2 meeting with Remus at the White House, NARA general counsel Gary Stern circulated a draft letter to AG Merrick Garland from Ferriero falsely suggesting Trump had destroyed presidential records.
Stern attended the Sept 8 with Ferriero and Remus:
Unsealed filings in classified docs include FBI affidavit to get search warrant to raid Mar-a-Lago. (Left is most recent publicly available affidavit that I'm aware of)
This is how DOJ shifted investigation from classified docs to Espionage Act case:
Why would this need to be redacted?
And keep in mind--as I flagged yesterday--two pallets of Trump's boxes were transported from GSA facility in VA to MAL in early August 2021.
This affidavit makes it sound like all the boxes originated from WH in Jan 2021.
So the FBI and DOJ's degenerate midget Jay Bratt (who went to MAL on June 3, 2022 to look for boxes) thought the Biden regime was entitled to get ALL of Trump's boxes?
John Sauer, representing Trump, gives opening statement. Already answering questions posed by Chief Judge John Roberts.
Says indictment uses vague statutes (2 of 4 in this indictment relate to 1512(c)(2) to criminalize "core authority" of the presidency.
Sotomayor already arguing what Trump did was for "personal gain" unlike what Obama did--one example used by Trump's team is could Obama be indicted for drone strikes that killed an American--bc Obama did it "to protect the country."
"The president is entitled for personal gain to use the trappings of his office without facing criminal liability." She mentions "creating false documents" as an example of committing a crime outside of scope of authority.
KBJ: Claims presidents since the beginning of time understood they could face criminal prosecution.
She then says the understanding stems from presidents being prosecuted "after impeachment."