And yes, I spot the hedge in the way its phrased: "Its a bubble but it's not ready to pop" covers all bases.
Blow up? We told you it was a bubble!
Rally? We told you it was not ready to pop!
Not really sure what the value of this duality is to investors...
here is why: We ignore the simple reality that the future is inherently unknown, and unknowable.
Once when we start talking about Uncertainty, what we really mean is our confidence in our flawed models is fading. The optimism we usually shown cracks.
The ‘uncertainty’ meme reveals how little we actually know about the next few months, quarters, years. Its a theme I have been exploring for more than a decade
Most of the time, we exist in a happy little bubble of self-created delusion. We lie to ourselves constantly. We rationalize everything we do, past and present. We engage in selective perception, seeing only the things that agree with us.
This works for us in most endeavors.
But it is a disaster to imagine you know the future in investing.
For me, the better approach is to think probabilistically, considering possibilities of what could happen.
Its a more humble way to think about what might occur.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
FOMC seems 2b always behind the curve, historically, going back to the 1990s under Greenspan.
They are a big + boring conservative institution & are fearful of error. They tend to be less aggressive when making decisions, with significant ramifications.
Consider the errors of just the past 2 decades and you can see the biggest mistake they make is either arriving way too late to the party or once they are there, overstaying their welcome:
1. Only 5 stocks driving markets 2. Recession is inevitable 3. Breadth is terrible 4. AI is a bubble 5. Debt ceiling = disaster 6. Problematic new lows 7. Consumers running out of money 8. Earnings will fail THIS Q 9. HH Debt! 10. Rally faltering
Let's see if I can find something to undercut each of those 10 items:
Only 5 stocks driving markets?
Then why are Equal-weighted indices doing so well?
What drives market returns? These rolling 10-year total returns going back to 1909 (via Crestmont Research) show an average ~10% annual total return over any 10-year long period.
Ed Easterling (of Crestmont) breaks down those returns into these components: EPS, Dividend Yield, and P/E Increase (or decrease).
Note how cyclical P/E expansion/contraction is...
This is why it is important to include whether P/Es are expanding or contracting in any definition of a bull or bear market.
It takes the Earth 365 days, 6 hours, 9 minutes + 9.76 seconds to complete 1 orbit – to return to the exact same place relative to the sun. Our planet has done this about 4.54 billion times.
What does this unit of time have to do with investing?
Alas, utterly nothing...
This is an example of the irrelevant nature of the calendar - I'd be curious to see what the data looks like for successive rolling 12-month periods rather than calendar years; it might also be more useful than using January - December periods