Katie Phang Profile picture
Sep 12, 2020 6 tweets 1 min read Read on X
“...since Michael Caputo, a former Trump campaign official with no medical or scientific background, was installed in April as the new HHS spokesperson, there have been substantial efforts to align the [CDC’s COVID reports] with Trump's statements.” politico.com/news/2020/09/1…
“The CDC's Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Reports are authored by career scientists and serve as the main vehicle for the agency to inform doctors, researchers and the general public about how Covid-19 is spreading and who is at risk.”
“Caputo & his team have attempted to add caveats to the CDC's findings, including an effort to retroactively change agency reports that they said wrongly inflated the risks of Covid-19.”
“Caputo's team delayed for a month the release of a report that addressed how doctors were prescribing hydroxychloroquine. Finally published last week, the report said that ‘the potential benefits of these drugs do not outweigh their risks.’”
“Caputo also said that HHS was appropriately reviewing the CDC's reports. ‘Our intention is to make sure that evidence, science-based data drives policy through this pandemic—not ulterior deep state motives in the bowels of CDC,’ he said.”
These moves are totally in line with Trump’s recently exposed comments to Bob Woodward to “downplay” the dangers of COVID-19.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Katie Phang

Katie Phang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KatiePhang

Apr 19
Day 4 of Trump’s NY election interference trial begins in just a few minutes with 22 prospective jurors in the box to answer the 42 questions from the juror questionnaire.
22 people are filing into the box.
Trump is present in court (as he’s required to be). Pool reporters advising that he is closing his eyes at times and at other times he’s chewing on something.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 18
NOW: the prosecution is handing up to Judge Merchan a NEW order to show cause as to why Trump should not be held in contempt of court for his latest social media posts.
ADA Conroy to Merchan: “Since you signed the last order that we handed up on Monday, the defendant has violated the order seven more times.”
ADA Conroy: “It’s ridiculous, it has to stop.”
I re-up an explanation from the other day: it sounds counterintuitive that the prosecution asks the Court for an order to show why Trump "should not be held in contempt" but that is the phraseology.

It means that the prosecution wants Trump to be held in contempt of court and it's asking the court to have Trump have to explain why he should not.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 16
UPDATE: Trump’s defense advises Judge Merchan that during the lunch recess, Trump’s team claims it discovered social media posts for multiple jurors that the defense claims directly contradict their answers to the questionnaire and show “hostility” to Trump.
A juror (a woman) is brought into the courtroom to be questioned about a Facebook post saying “It’s a full-on celebration in NYC” and “get in the car and spread some honking cheer!” on Election Day 2020.
Upon questioning, she says she went to move her car and saw a celebration. It reminded her of the essential worker celebrations.

She emphasizes that she strongly believes she can do the job of a juror.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 15
Judge Merchan is back on the bench after the brief recess.
Our amazing @adamreisstv advises that he can see what looks like Secret Service agents in the front row behind Trump.
@adamreisstv Merchan begins by ruling that the Prosecution cannot introduce into evidence, during its Direct Examination of Michael Cohen, Trump's attacks on him BUT they can use them in their Redirect Examination of Cohen.
Read 8 tweets
Apr 15
Judge Merchan addresses Trump's Friday pre-motion letter putting forth some issues he has with the jury selection process.

The DA’s office does not object to asking two questions to prospective jurors to determine why they self-identify as being unable to be unable to serve, as in is it because of they cannot be fair and impartial or it's b/c they have other issues like medical reasons or caregiving obligations.
Blanche argues that the defense objects to the definition of activities as “anti-Trump” without further detail in the questionnaire. However, the DA's Office says there's nothing unfair about the way the question is written.
Judge Merchan rules: "Whether or not someone does not like Trump is irrelevant. There is no asymmetry in the questionnaire when viewed through the lens of what we are trying to accomplish.”
Read 4 tweets
Apr 11
➡️The jury selection process in Trump's NY trial on Monday should go as follows:

▪️ 18 prospective jurors will be put in the jury box at a time and each one will read aloud their answers to the 42 questions in the jury questionnaire.
▪️ Prosecutors can first ask questions of the 18.
▪️ Defense then asks questions of the 18.
▪️ For-cause challenges can be raised for the first 12.
▪️ Peremptory challenges then can be raised for the first 12. Each side is entitled to 10 peremptory challenges for a Class E felony.
▪️ Any remaining jurors are then seated as jurors for the trial.
▪️ They then move on to the next group of 6 jurors & repeat the same process until 12 jurors are selected at which time they move to choose alternates.
A for-cause challenge is one wherein the juror has indicated that they cannot be fair and impartial; their answers indicate that they are biased in some way against one side so they are not able to sit as a juror.
A peremptory challenge can be the striking of a prospective juror without having to articulate a reason. Maybe you don't like the clothes they're wearing; maybe their body language doesn't feel right to you. Regardless, you want to strike that juror and not have them sit on your case.

HOWEVER: You cannot use a peremptory challenge to strike a juror based on their race, gender, religion, or national origin. That is impermissible.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(