4/ Broad domains each contain six facets: co-related but distinct behaviors.
For example, Extraversion splits into: Activity, Assertiveness, Excitement-seeking, Gregariousness, Positive emotion, & Warmth.
5/ @jordanbpeterson's paper suggests there is an "intermediate level of personality structure between facets and domains" called Aspects.
@jordanbpeterson writes: "Reasons exist to suspect that this level might be both interesting and important."
6/ Think of Aspects as two poles within Domains.
Conscientiousness: Industriousness & Orderliness
Agreeableness: Compassion & Politeness
Neuroticism: Volatility & Withdrawl
Openness: Intellect & Imagination
Extraversion: Assertiveness & Enthusiasm
7/ Aspects of the same domain differ from each other in fascinating ways.
Take Conscientiousness. Industrious people prefer productivity; orderly people prefer tidiness.
8/ Conscientiousness has "both proactive and inhibitive aspects."
Proactive striving for achievement v/s inhibitive instincts like caution.
9/ Agreeableness splits into Compassion & Politeness.
Compassion = emotional warmth
Politeness = reasoned cooperation
The former is based on feelings; the latter is "cognitively influenced."
10/ Neuroticism's two aspects are differing responses to threat.
Volatility = externalizing stress.
Withdrawal = internalizing stress.
Volatility manifests as hostility and panic. Withdrawal manifests as anxiety and depression.
11/ Openness is an amalgam of two desires.
Intellect desires truth.
Imagination desires beauty.
Imaginative people seek "aesthetics and fantasy" while intellectual people seek "ingenuity and ideas."
12/ Extraversion comes in two different forms:
Assertiveness: The desire to be important in social settings
Enthusiasm: The desire to be sociable
Assertive people are provocative & exhibitionistic.
Enthusiastic people are friendly and display positive emotions.
13/ Aspects make the Big Five Model richer conceptually, and more useful practically!
There are lots of interesting relationships between the aspects too.
Example 1: Assertiveness is negatively correlated with Politeness but Enthusiasm is positively correlated with it.
14/ Example 2: The negative correlation between Conscientiousness and Neuroticism is among "the most robust correlations in the Big Five."
But this is misleading.
Industriousness is negatively associated with Neuroticism, but orderliness is "significantly positively correlated"
15/ Domain to domain comparison was "suppressing" the more nuanced truth that is revealed by an aspects-level analysis.
From the paper: "Given two people with equal levels of Industriousness, the one higher in Orderliness is likely to show higher levels of Neuroticism. "
16/ @jordanbpeterson draws on previous research to show that aspects within a domain may have distinct genetic origins.
17/ For instance, within neuroticism, volatility may be rooted in the Fight or Flight(FF) response & withdrawal may be rooted in the Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS).
FF may manifest in behavior as panic and hostility; BIS as chronic inactivity.
18/ Hope you enjoyed this breakdown!
This paper was hard but rewarding to read. Shoutout to @jordanbpeterson's co-authors: @LCQuilty and Colin G. DeYoung!
19/ Publishing next week: key ideas and insights from @JonHaidt's most cited academic paper!
• Never took a bath
• Never lost a fight
• Wrote one of Joe Rogan's all-time favorite books:
The Book of Five Rings (1645)
The book is 380 years old but its wisdom still holds up. A thread:
1/ Miyamoto Musashi was undefeated across 61 duels. An all-time record. He never married, never had children, and according to rumors, never combed his hair. He was a strange but profoundly wise man. Rogan says his book is "one of the most valuable things anyone has ever written"
2/ Have no favorite weapon. Musashi cautions fighters against over-reliance on one move or "special fondness for a particular weapon"
He writes: "Too much is the same as not enough"
Stay pragmatic, dont entertain "likes and dislikes," arm yourself with what you need for victory
Hot take: too much humility is a sin. Sometimes you need to over-estimate your abilities so you take bigger leaps. The humble take negative feedback seriously and fold; the arrogant maintain a bull-headed stubbornness in the face of repeat failures. Guess who ultimately wins
Schopenhauer: "For what is modesty but hypocritical humility, by means of which...a man seeks to beg pardon for his excellences from those who have none? Whoever attributes no merit to himself because he really has none is not modest, but merely honest.”
John Fowles explains in "The Aristos" (1964) how high IQ can subvert your will to act: "High intelligence leads to multiplicity of interest and a sharpened capacity to foresee the consequences of any action. Will is lost in a labyrinth of hypothesis." Rule 1: Do not lose the will
Carlyle in 1841: "A man lives by believing something; not by debating and arguing about many things."
Chesterton on how an open mind is no more a virtue than an open mouth: "The object of opening the mind, as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid”
A knight who owns a sharp sword should make sure he does not cut himself with it, and a man gifted with a great mind should make sure he does not start living inside it...
It's the best mental model for understanding how political change ACTUALLY happens
A thread...
1/ Overton was a libertarian political scientist. In the 1990s, while raising funds for rightwing thinktank Mackinac Center, he kept meeting donors who didn't understand what thinktanks actually do. He coined a new concept to solve this problem: Window of Political Possibilities
2/ Overton argued that politicians are not leaders but followers
Since they want to get re-elected, they'll only turn those proposals into policy which already have some public appeal
A totally unpopular idea? Political suicide. Outside the "window of political possibilities"