10-K Diver Profile picture
Sep 12, 2020 32 tweets 9 min read Read on X
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll help you understand inventory turnover.
2/

Imagine that you own 2 stores: G and J.

G is a grocery store. It has low gross margins (30%). You buy cabbages for 70 cents and sell them for a dollar.

J is a jewelry store. It has much higher gross margins (60%). You buy diamonds for $40K and sell them for $100K. Image
3/

Which store is likely to give you better returns over time?

As investors, we usually associate higher gross margins with better returns.

So, you may be tempted to say that J will give you better returns than G.

But in fact, just the opposite may turn out to be true.
4/

Why?

Because, although gross margins are important, they're not the only factor determining your returns.

To really understand a retail business (like a grocery or jewelry store), you need to study the movement of inventory in and out of the business.
5/

What exactly is "inventory"?

It's a fancy accounting term.

It just means "stuff that has been bought but not yet sold".
6/

For example, suppose G (your grocery store) buys a cabbage from a farmer.

This cabbage sits on a shelf -- until someone buys it.

For as long as the cabbage is on the shelf (ie, the cabbage has been bought by G, but not yet sold), it counts as "inventory".
7/

Suppose G pays the farmer $0.70 when it buys the cabbage from him.

Immediately after buying the cabbage, G is $0.70 "out of pocket". But it has $0.70 worth of inventory (the cabbage).

Eventually, G sells the cabbage for $1. That's how G gets its 30% gross margin.
8/

The key question is: how much time does it take for G to sell the cabbage?

The sooner G sells the cabbage, the sooner it gets its money back. Then it can use this money to buy another cabbage.

And the "cabbage cycle" can continue: Image
9/

See how G pockets $0.30 in gross profits every time it goes around the cabbage cycle?

For example, suppose G is able to sell cabbages the same day it buys them.

Then, G can execute the cabbage cycle 365 times in a year. This is $0.30*365 = $109.50 in annual gross profits.
10/

But suppose the cabbages sit on G's shelves for about a week before someone buys them.

Then, G can execute the cabbage cycle only about 52 times per year. This is only $0.30*52 = $15.60 in annual gross profits.
11/

Thus, the "number of times G can execute the cabbage cycle in a year" is super important.

In fancy business speak, this number is called "inventory turnover".

Higher the inventory turnover, higher the gross profits. Image
12/

If G sells cabbages the same day it buys them, inventory turnover will be 365.

But if G takes a week to sell the cabbages, inventory turnover will drop to 52 -- taking gross profits down with it.
13/

Here's a formula you can use to estimate inventory turnover: just divide cost of goods sold (COGS) by the average inventory held during the year. Image
14/

Note: many investors estimate inventory turnover by dividing *revenue* -- instead of *COGS* -- by inventory.

But this is not strictly correct: inventory is held on the books at *cost price*, whereas revenue is booked at *sale price*.

(h/t Geoff Gannon @FocusedCompound).
15/

A closely related metric is "days of inventory held" -- the inverse of inventory turnover.

This is how many days a business will take to sell all the inventory it holds: Image
16/

These concepts can help us compare our grocery store business (G) with our jewelry store business (J).

The fact is: turning around cabbages is much easier than turning around diamonds.

So inventory turnover will be higher at G, but gross margins will be higher at J.
17/

For example, suppose G is comparable to a Sprouts store, and J is comparable to a Tiffany store.

Then, here's how G will stack up against J (based on the 2019 financials of Sprouts and Tiffany): Image
18/

Key lesson: Gross margins alone don't tell you how much a business will return on capital employed. You should also consider inventory turnover.
19/

For example, if your capital is tied up in inventory that takes a long time to sell (like 521 days in the case of Tiffany), you may not earn a high return on that capital -- even if you eventually sell the inventory at a big markup.
20/

But if you can turn around your inventory quickly (like in 27 days, as in Sprouts), you may be able to earn a high return on your capital even if your gross margins aren't that big.
21/

OK. So both gross margins and inventory turnover matter.

What else matters?

Well, the timing of cash flows is a key factor. This includes 2 components:

1. How much time customers take to pay you for goods, and

2. How much time you can take to pay suppliers for inventory.
22/

How much time customers take to pay.

In the best businesses, customers pay *upfront* for goods they buy later.

But not all businesses are this fortunate.

Generally, the more time customers take to pay for goods, the more capital is tied up in receivables earning 0%.
23/

For example, Starbucks is wonderful in this respect.

When you load your Starbucks card with money, you're pre-paying Starbucks for coffee that you will buy later.

Here's an excellent article about this (h/t @jp_koning, @rationalwalk): jpkoning.blogspot.com/2019/08/starbu…
24/

How much time you can take to pay suppliers for the inventory you buy from them.

Generally, the longer you can take, the better your return on capital.

In effect, your suppliers are paying for part of your inventory. It's their capital tied up on your shelves, not yours.
25/

AutoZone is great in this regard.

As of Aug 31 2019, they had $4.3B in inventory, but they owed $4.9B to their suppliers.

This means they don't pay for inventory until *after* they sell it -- at a 50%+ gross profit!

This is called "negative working capital". It's rare. Image
26/

Thus, there are 4 inventory turnaround parameters: 1) when you buy inventory, 2) when you pay suppliers for it, 3) when you sell it, and 4) when you get paid by customers for it.

These parameters, in addition to gross margins, determine the business's returns on capital.
27/

Here's a formula that ties all these parameters together, to predict the unlevered, pre-tax ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) that the business will earn -- along with an example showing how to apply the formula: ImageImage
28/

The formula above shows that ROCE will depend on both gross margins *and* inventory turnover parameters.

Also, the formula shows that ROCE will depend on operating efficiencies: you want to keep non-COGS costs like rent and employee salaries under control.
29/

And also, the formula takes into account the fixed assets (like buildings) required to earn this ROCE. In general, businesses that need more in the way of fixed assets tend to have lower ROCEs.
30/

I want to stress that this formula is approximate.

And it's only valid when there's no debt -- the "unlevered" stipulation.

Retail is complicated. Growth rates, seasonality, capex, debt structure -- all come into play.

No formula is perfect. But some formulas are useful.
31/

If there's one thing to take away from this thread, it's the importance of thinking in multiple dimensions.

Don't look at gross margins alone, or inventory turnover alone. Look at the combined effect of all the key factors.

Thanks for reading! Enjoy your weekend!

/End
Some folks wanted to know how I got the ROCE formula in Tweet 27 above.

Hence this “appendix tweet” with my derivation. See pics.

(Don’t worry if you don’t understand the math. Just remember that both gross margins *and* inventory turnover matter — not just one or the other.) ImageImageImageImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with 10-K Diver

10-K Diver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @10kdiver

Jan 1, 2023
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through "Gambler's Ruin".

This is a classic exercise in probability theory.

But going beyond the math, this exercise can teach us a lot about life, business, and investing.
2/

In my mind, Gambler's Ruin is the math of "David vs Goliath" ("Skill vs Size") type situations.

Here, David is a "small" player. He only has limited resources. But he's very skilled.

Pitted against David is Goliath -- a "big" player who has MORE resources but LESS skill.
3/

The battle between David and Goliath rages on for several "rounds".

Each round has a "winner" -- either David or Goliath.

David -- because of his superior skill -- has a higher probability of winning any individual round. That's David's advantage over Goliath.
Read 32 tweets
Dec 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, we'll explore the question:

As investors, how often should we check stock prices?

To answer this, we'll draw on key ideas and concepts from many different fields -- probability, information theory, psychology, etc.
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC, Inc.

Every day that the market is open, our stock either:

- Goes UP 1%, or
- Goes DOWN 1%.

For simplicity, let's say these are the only 2 possible outcomes on any given trading day.
3/

Suppose we think ABC is a "good" investment.

That is, the company has a wide moat, good returns on capital, decent growth prospects, etc. And the stock trades at a reasonable price.

So, we buy the stock -- expecting to make a very good return on it. Say, ~15% per year.
Read 40 tweets
Oct 23, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through 2 key portfolio diversification principles:

(i) Minimizing correlations, and
(ii) Re-balancing intelligently.

You don't need Markowitz's portfolio theory or the Kelly Criterion to understand these concepts. Image
2/

Imagine we have a stock: ABC Inc. Ticker: $ABC.

The good thing about ABC is: in 4 out of 5 years (ie, with probability 80%), the stock goes UP 30%.

But the *rest* of the time -- ie, with probability 20%, or in 1 out of 5 years -- the stock goes DOWN 50%.
3/

We have no way to predict in advance which years will be good and which will be bad.

So, let's say we just buy and hold ABC stock for a long time -- like 25 years.

The question is: what return are we most likely to get from ABC over these 25 years?
Read 23 tweets
Sep 11, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through the P/E Ratio.

Why do some companies trade at 5x earnings and others trade at 50x earnings?

When I first started investing, this was hard for me to understand.

So, let me break it down for you.
2/

Imagine we have 2 companies, A and B.

Let's say both companies will earn $1 per share next year.

And both companies will also GROW their earnings at the SAME rate: 10% per year. Every year. Forever.
3/

Suppose A trades at a (forward) P/E Ratio of 10. So, each share of A costs $10.

And B trades at a P/E Ratio of 15. So, each share of B costs $15.

Which is the better long term investment: A or B?
Read 31 tweets
Sep 4, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a fundamental business concept that may be counter-intuitive to some of you:

Just because a business has made $1 of PROFIT, it does NOT mean the business's owners have $1 of CASH to pocket.
2/

To understand why, let's start with how PROFIT is defined.

PROFIT = SALES - COSTS

That is, we take all sales (or revenues) the company made during a quarter or year.

We back out all costs incurred during this period.

That leaves us with profits.

Seems straightforward.
3/

Here's the problem:

The way a "lay person" understands words like SALES and COSTS is completely different from the way an *accountant* uses these same words.

These discrepancies can create enormous confusion.
Read 20 tweets
Aug 28, 2022
1/

Get a cup of coffee.

In this thread, I'll walk you through a framework that I call "Lindy vs Turkey".

This is a super-useful set of ideas for investors.

Time and again, these ideas have helped me think more clearly about the LONGEVITY of the companies in my portfolio.
2/

Imagine we're buying shares in a company -- ABC Inc.

ABC is a very simple company. It earns $1 per share every year. These earnings don't grow over time.

And ABC returns all its earnings back to its owners -- by issuing a $1/share dividend at the end of each year.
3/

Suppose we buy ABC shares for $5 a share.

That's a P/E ratio of 5.

We know we get back $1/year as a dividend.

So, for us to NOT lose money, ABC should survive AT LEAST 5 more years.

If something happens and ABC DIES before then, we'll likely lose money.
Read 32 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(