1. So, in talking about class privilege and white privilege here in this thread, I realized something, which is that in no small part due to the high school I went to, my own experience of white and class privilege is (slightly) different than most folks. Let's explore!
2. To begin, two clarifications: In the US, white privilege and class privilege are SUPER-related, both as a matter of correlation and causation. More than 96% of the 1% are white. Come on. They're intertwined and inseparable. This is important for later in this thread.
3. Also, when I noted the "boarding school college counselor" thing, I was meaning it as "in addition to white privilege" not "instead of white privilege" and did it poorly enough that people wanted clarification. My mistake, BUT it made me think on my own white/class thoughts.
4. And they are that *in my head,* class and whiteness have been slightly more separated than they are in the US, and part of that has to do with my high school, The Webb Schools of California, which is a high-end private boarding school in the LA area.
5. As context (and as many of you know), I grew up poor in working-to-middle-class southern California communities in the 70s and 80s, so with mostly white and Latinx folks. I went to Webb on scholarship and boarded there, even though I lived nearby.
6. Webb was my first real glimpse into 1% lives, and for the 80s it was fairly diverse: We had a lot of international students (mostly from Asia and the Middle East, but also Latin America) and the kids of financially successful Indian and Asian immigrants...
7. ... in addition to the white California elite, and the occasional scholarship kid (waves).
(Webb was not great with local Black and Latinx students -- some but not a lot. It would make an effort to change this in recent years and has made some progress as far as I can see.)
8. So it's fair to say that my first real contact and connection to the upper class, and my introduction to class divisions and issues, was *different* than most US folks, and also, *unrepresentative.* Webb was/is upper class, but it's a more diverse/global upper class...
9. ... than the upper class of the US as a whole -- not removed from it but wholly of it, either. Inasmuch as my formative experience of wealth was an admittedly unrepresentatively diverse one, in the context of US wealth and class, I still find myself tripping over the fact...
10. ... that it was and *is* unrepresentative, and continues to be -- because the alumni network of Webb is very tight. I'm now well off myself; my own relationship to it is still informed by this more diverse/global experience I grew up in, more than where I now live.
11. This is not a cookie bearing statement AT ALL -- class privilege is a set of issues to be confronted and questioned whether one fancies oneself to have a "diverse/global" outlook on it or not, and my having to adjust my brain to the realities of US class privilege is a thing.
12. But, for me, it does *explain* the little bit of mental dissonance I have about whiteness and the US upper class -- and consequently, can give a little context for the people who *notice* I've implicitly made that distinction when, in the US, it's not significantly there.
13. What the point of this thread? There is none, other than me typing out something I just fully realized, and by typing it out, making concrete something I need to work on for the future. Welcome to my brain! The typed out part of it, anyway. /end
POSTSCRIPT: Forgot the cat picture as a reward for reading all the way through. D'oh! Here it is! With two cats, even!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. To reiterate this once again for everyone: If you see me blurbing a book, it's because I have actually read the fucking thing and I liked it enough to say so in public. I (and I daresay Neil) don't have to blurb a goddamned thing for self-promotion.
2. A blurb won't make or break a book, but they certainly can have an effect on the margins - several is the time where someone has told me they found a new favorite book because they saw my blurb for it and that helped them to take a chance on it. That makes me happy. It worked.
3. I think it's easy to be cynical about blurbs and I think it's reasonable to take them with a grain of salt (the bit about good authors sometimes having bad taste is... not wrong). But the heart of blurbing is authors being actual READERS and being excited to share new books.
I remember 4th grade being the year the kids at Ben Lomond Elementary decided they were incorporating swear words into their vocabulary, and I have never heard more and more consistent swearing before or since. So, yes, Texas parents, your precious children have let "fuck" fly.
Note to self: Write into appearance contracts that if I'm "disinvited" to an event, that I'm still to be paid my appearance fee plus all non-refundable expenses (air fare, etc). If nothing else, it will cut down on bullshit invites from snowflaky sorts.
1. So, a thread on where I am with Twitter right now, and how, at the moment, I'm going to be using it. Don't worry, there's a cat picture at the end of it.
2. First, I'm of two minds of Twitter's immediate survival. Anecdotally it feels like the follower bloodletting has subsided a bit, which is good, but the actual technological foundation is crumbling more rapidly, which is bad. Musk is closing data centers and not paying rent...
3. ... or paying key creditors, which means absolutely nothing good. It's entirely possible Twitter blows up simply from tech neglect and/or lack of capacity and/or employees getting sick of having to bring their own toilet paper because Musk fired the janitors...
THREAD: I've had people ask, given the general ridiculousness, mercuriality and fascist-friendly demeanor of Twitter's current owner, if I intend to stick around. So, here's the current state of my thinking, and why, for now, the answer is yes.
First, bluntly, I don't expect the current owner will remain the current owner for very long. He's losing too much money and he's damaged the product too much for it to become profitable for him. If he still owns it in a year, I'll be mildly surprised; in two, very surprised.
(If he still owns it in two years, it's because he's tried to use Twitter to become a kingmaker in the 2024 election cycle. While I don't think that's going to be great for anyone, I also suspect the body politic will have a few more antibodies against that kind of fuckery.)
1. Because I think it'll be fun, I'm going to do a daily advent-like calendar of AI images made from Christmas-themed text prompts, and make it into a thread. Also, to support actual artists and the impact their art can have, I have donated to @RxArtInc:
2. From the mission statement of @RxArtInc: "RxART commissions established contemporary artists to transform children’s hospital settings into engaging and uplifting healing environments." That seems like a worthy goal and worth donating to.
3. If you enjoy the thread of (sometimes weird but hopefully fun) images I'll be posting here, I hope you'll consider donating to @rxart and/or other visual arts-related charities near you, and also supporting actual artists and their buying their work. Support art and artists!