Remember the Spider-Man movie where Mary Jane (Kirsten Dunst) wore a cheongsam (a tight-fitting Chinese dress with a high collar)? Nicole Kidman wore one to an event. So has Emma Watson, Uma Thurman, & an unending list of celebs.
So it should be the height of cool, right? Fashionable, & worn by professionally fashionable people.
I think cheongsams are gorgeous. But I can't wear one without being seen as foreign and Other. I don't get cool, fashionable points.
(Though I might get sexy points related to being "exotic," which I don't always want to deal with.)
So I almost never get to wear a beautiful style of dress that is distinctively Chinese, because there are layers of overt and covert racism that tend to surface when I do.
And that's sad. It's a part of my heritage that has been essentially taken away from me by the dominant culture. It's a loss.
Here's what cultural appropriation is not.
It is not just any time you fuse different styles of art together from different origins. Fusion can be done respectfully and with understanding and humility. (I think about this a lot! Almost every form of art I practice is fusion.)
It can also be done in ways that make marginalized folks feel gross as they watch ppl from the dominant culture get accolades they themselves are denied.
(See: White chefs gaining cachet in the food world for making "ethnic" foods- often poorly- while Chinatowns get ostracized.)
Are the lines sometimes blurry? Yes. But if you're doing any kind of artistic fusion, at bare minimum you owe it to every culture you're borrowing from to work through the various issues at play and accord them full respect as your teachers, not the other way around.
Ultimately cultural appropriation is all about power and power imbalances. Marginalized people are required to learn the culture of dominant culture in order to survive.
So of course in the US we wear "white" clothes & speak English & groom ourselves in particular ways.
Dominant culture requires us to learn.
In modern Thailand, most people eat with forks & spoons. Why? Thais traditionally ate using their hands. But they had to use forks to get Europeans to take them seriously, because eating with one's hands was considered "uncivilized."
So they had to change. In order to survive, they had to appear "modern" and "civilized" to Western eyes. (And this strategy worked - Thailand is the only country in the region that avoided being colonized.)
That impetus to learn doesn't exist the other way around.
Over 1000 flights cancelled this weekend because staff are sick.
It's almost like US airlines, with their breathless "yay, no masks!!" failed to learn from the UK... which did exactly the same thing, with exactly the same results. 🙄
Wow. Make that 5000 flights. 😯
Delta is primarily blaming bad weather... But also admitting not having enough staff due to COVID absences.
Hmm, if only there was a way to minimize transmission somewhat. A covering you could put on your face maybe. 🤔
One of the murdered women was the owner of the spa and had worked herself up from being a nail tech. She was a licensed massage therapist. You can see it as the "American Dream" if you want. She worked hard and made good. It ended with an American murder.
The reason the narrative now is all about sex is that Asian women have been sexualized by the West for hundreds of years. Racism against Asian women almost always has a sexualized component - official sanction of this goes all the way back to the Page Act in 1875.
Here's the thing: This kind of violence and hatred isn't new.
It's escalated (exponentially) thanks to conversatives blaming China for COVID. But American violence against people who look like me has been happening for 200 years.
This country never wanted us. The very first immigration ban was put in place because the US didn't want Chinese people. The entire concept of "legal" vs. "illegal" immigration exists because of American xenophobia toward us.
Anti-miscegenation laws listed us specifically.
The US had laws specifically prohibiting Asians from becoming citizens. And laws specifically barring us from owning property. The latest one was passed in 1943, and many of them were not stuck down until the 1950s.
Trump's officially nominated Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court.
Amy Coney Barrett was part of the legal team that helped George W. Bush win his recount battle in Florida in 2000.
That election was decided by 537 votes. In a state where perhaps 12,000 voters were incorrectly removed from the rolls (no one knows the exact number).
But here's the thing: It may only take 3.5% of a population to topple a dictator. And we're not quite there yet, though we've gone a long way down that path.
Call your reps & never stop making a stink even when the current admin lives down to your already low expectations - people who study autocrats say that autocrats take and keep power bc feckless bureaucrats will support whoever seems to have the upper hand.
Make it look like the people have the other hand. Remind them that they will be held accountable.
Vote like your life and the lives of people you care about are on the line, because they are.