Michael Pettis Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/
They've said this many times before, Noah, but things have been getting consistently worse, not better. The amount of debt it takes to generate a unit of GDP has been growing rapidly, even as GDP growth has slowed, and within Beijing there is a fierce debate about whether...
2/
or not they should take aggressive steps to get debt under control, even if this results in much slower growth and a rise in unemployment. Last year for example there was a big debate over whether to target 6% GDP growth or something much lower. If they did not think the...
3/
debt were a serious problem, and if they believed that Chinese growth was healthy, real and meaningful, why would they even bother having this debate?

The biggest disagreement I have with the Economist, I would say, is over their failure to understand the sources of...
4/
Chinese debt and why the debt burden matters. They seem to think that the fact that China has avoided a financial crisis means that debt isn't that big of a problem, whereas I would argue that China was never likely to have a financial crisis, not because debt isn't a...
5/
problem but rather because financial crises are balance-sheet events, and with its closed banking system and strong regulators, Beijing can restructure liabilities at will and so can quite easily prevent a balance-sheet crisis.

The real test is whether it is possible for...
6/
China to maintain high growth rates without much faster growth in the debt that must fund huge amounts of non-productive investment. These two are related, of course, because if most debt goes to fund investment, and if the investment is productive, there is no way a...
7/
country's debt-to-GDP ratio can grow so rapidly and for so long.

But if anything is clear, it is that China simply cannot tolerate any slowdown in the growth in debt without suffering a very, very sharp slowdown in GDP growth. We know from the history of investment-driven...
8/
growth "miracles" that the problem always arises once total debt stops growing faster than GDP. In that case the country either adjusts in the form of a crisis or in the form of "lost decades" of much slower growth, and a considerable part of that adjustment consists of...
9/
writing down years and years of misallocated investment that was capitalized when it should have been expensed (similar to what Galbraith referred to as the "bezzle").

That, by the way, is one of the main differences between growing debt in China and growing debt in...
10/
the US, Europe and elsewhere. In the former case the expenditures are capitalized and show up as increases in wealth, but not in the latter cases.

We have no idea of how long China can sustain this growth in debt, but we also know that the longer it goes on, the more...
11/
difficult the adjustment will be. Until then, nothing has really changed, in my opinion.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Sep 26
1/7
Amy Kapczynski argues that "everywhere you look in Washington today, there are signs that industrial policy is back. The presidential election is a fight not over whether we will have industrial policy, but over what kind we should have."

democracyjournal.org/arguments/indu…
2/7
I would put it a little differently. Industrial policy has been especially powerful in driving the US economy in recent decades, but this industrial policy was mostly designed abroad. What's new is that the US is determined to regain control over how this policy is designed.
3/7
In a globalized world, changes in one country's trade and capital accounts must be automatically accommodated by opposite changes in the trade and capital accounts of its trade partners. That's because globally, external accounts must balance.
Read 7 tweets
Sep 26
1/4
Bloomberg "China said it will give one-off cash handouts to people in extreme poverty before Tuesday, in a rare announcement of direct aid just a day after unveiling a sweeping program to stimulate the world’s second-largest economy."

via @marketsbloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/4
These are just the kinds of fiscal transfers that will boost consumption spending in the short term. The problem is that the amounts are likely to be too small to matter and, more importantly, that these are one-off fiscal transfers that don't really address the underlying...
3/4
income distribution that has created the imbalances. Until structural reforms are implemented that eliminate the implicit and explicit transfers that force households to subsidize production and investment, the underlying imbalances won't really change.
Read 4 tweets
Sep 18
1/8
An interesting debate between Elizabeth Pancotti, Todd N. Tucker and Matthew Yglesias on the pros and cons of tariffs. The problem I have with most debates over tariffs is that they often proceed as if tariffs were…

democracyjournal.org/magazine/74/ar…
2/8
a unique (and often uniquely dangerous) form of trade policy. In fact tariffs are just like many other trade and industrial policies that operate through transfers from one sector of the economy (usually households) to another (usually manufacturers or other producers).
3/8
Tariffs affect the economy in the same ways as currency depreciation, subsidized borrowing costs, price controls, capital controls, export subsidies, support for specific industries or infrastructure, wage constraints, policies to support or undermine unions, and so on.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 13
1/10
Good IMF blog that reminds us that trade imbalances are largely driven by domestic macro forces rather than by incremental price effects. It notes that China’s growing trade surpluses were driven by a rise in Chinese savings caused both by the...

imf.org/en/Blogs/Artic…
2/10
weak household income share of GDP and the rise in precautionary savings as property prices crashed and economic uncertainty rose, while US deficits are caused by fiscal policies that drove down US savings.
3/10
But I have two problems with this analysis. First, the authors claim that while subsidies associated with Chinese industrial policy “do play some role in generating international trade spillovers in the respective sectors, the estimated effects are however modest, suggesting that…
Read 8 tweets
Sep 12
1/8
China' private secret is suffering. Among other things, "“China used to be the best VC destination in the world after the US,” says one Beijing-based executive, but “the industry has just died before our eyes. The entrepreneurial spirit is dead.”

ft.com/content/1e9e75…
2/8
The article goes on to note that "in 2018, at the height of VC investment, 51,302 start-ups were founded in China, according to data provider IT Judi. By 2023, that figure had collapsed to 1,202 and is on track to be even lower this year."
3/8
While it has been clear for years that the role of the private sector in the economy has contracted relative to the role of the public sector, if you want to understand why China's adjustment has been, and will continue to be, so difficult, it is important to understand why this has happened.
Read 8 tweets
Sep 11
1/5
This is almost a textbook example of why most discussions of tariffs and inflation completely miss the point. The discussion assumes that a tariff raises the price of the tariffed product (of course it does) but has no other impact on the overall economy.
2/5
The discussion assumes, among other things, that tariffs have no impact on tax collection or profits, when clearly they do. Much more importantly, it assumes tariffs have no impact on demand for non-tariffed goods or (most astonishingly) on total domestic production.
3/5
But this makes the discussion totally surreal. Inflation is not what happens when the price of a single product rises. It is what happens when total demand rises relative to total supply.

But the whole point of tariffs is to boost domestic production, i.e. total supply.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(