Michael Pettis Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 11 tweets 3 min read Read on X
1/
They've said this many times before, Noah, but things have been getting consistently worse, not better. The amount of debt it takes to generate a unit of GDP has been growing rapidly, even as GDP growth has slowed, and within Beijing there is a fierce debate about whether...
2/
or not they should take aggressive steps to get debt under control, even if this results in much slower growth and a rise in unemployment. Last year for example there was a big debate over whether to target 6% GDP growth or something much lower. If they did not think the...
3/
debt were a serious problem, and if they believed that Chinese growth was healthy, real and meaningful, why would they even bother having this debate?

The biggest disagreement I have with the Economist, I would say, is over their failure to understand the sources of...
4/
Chinese debt and why the debt burden matters. They seem to think that the fact that China has avoided a financial crisis means that debt isn't that big of a problem, whereas I would argue that China was never likely to have a financial crisis, not because debt isn't a...
5/
problem but rather because financial crises are balance-sheet events, and with its closed banking system and strong regulators, Beijing can restructure liabilities at will and so can quite easily prevent a balance-sheet crisis.

The real test is whether it is possible for...
6/
China to maintain high growth rates without much faster growth in the debt that must fund huge amounts of non-productive investment. These two are related, of course, because if most debt goes to fund investment, and if the investment is productive, there is no way a...
7/
country's debt-to-GDP ratio can grow so rapidly and for so long.

But if anything is clear, it is that China simply cannot tolerate any slowdown in the growth in debt without suffering a very, very sharp slowdown in GDP growth. We know from the history of investment-driven...
8/
growth "miracles" that the problem always arises once total debt stops growing faster than GDP. In that case the country either adjusts in the form of a crisis or in the form of "lost decades" of much slower growth, and a considerable part of that adjustment consists of...
9/
writing down years and years of misallocated investment that was capitalized when it should have been expensed (similar to what Galbraith referred to as the "bezzle").

That, by the way, is one of the main differences between growing debt in China and growing debt in...
10/
the US, Europe and elsewhere. In the former case the expenditures are capitalized and show up as increases in wealth, but not in the latter cases.

We have no idea of how long China can sustain this growth in debt, but we also know that the longer it goes on, the more...
11/
difficult the adjustment will be. Until then, nothing has really changed, in my opinion.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Pettis

Michael Pettis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelxpettis

Apr 7
1/15
IMF: "If coordination proves difficult, the best course of action for each country is clear: start addressing domestic imbalances now, regardless of what others do."

This is one of several discordant lines in an otherwise interesting paper.

imf.org/en/blogs/artic…
2/15
It is good that the IMF (along with others) increasingly recognizes the adverse consequences of persistent trade imbalances, and recognizes that "the relevant metric is the overall position of a country against the rest of the world, not bilateral or sectoral balances."
3/15
But I still don't think they understand how imbalances are transmitted. They assume that every country determines and controls its internal imbalances, and so also determines and controls its external imbalances.

But this implies that the world balances by coincidence.
Read 15 tweets
Apr 6
1/7
Martin Wolf, in an important piece on unsustainable current account imbalances, makes a point that most American economists miss: "the counterpart of external deficits tends to be unsustainable domestic borrowing."
via @ftft.com/content/49e38e…
2/7
He goes on to say: "The Keynesian hypothesis looks right: the inflow of net foreign savings, shown in capital account surpluses made big fiscal deficits necessary, because domestic demand in the US would otherwise have been chronically inadequate."
3/7
This, by the way, is consistent with Joan Robinson's argument that trade surpluses are "beggar thy neighbor" when they export unemployment. The difference is that in economies in which credit is not constrained by gold, the alternative to unemployment can be debt.
Read 7 tweets
Apr 4
1/12
Bloomberg: "Canada pitched expanding its financial services presence in the Chinese market as the northern nation aims to increase exports to its second-largest trading partner in a push to diversify from the US." bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
2/12
The article continues: "Expanding Canadian financial services activity in China is key to achieving the government’s goal of increasing exports by 50% by 2030, according to Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne."
3/12
I am not sure that expanding financial services activity really is key to expanding Canadian exports to China. It might help a little, but what Canadian exporters most lack isn't friendly financing.

This just sounds like the kind of thing a banker would tell policymakers.
Read 12 tweets
Apr 3
1/12
Caixin: "For the first time, China has embedded a dedicated plan to raise household incomes into a top-level national policy document, signaling a change in priorities as policymakers grapple with persistently weak consumer spending."
caixinglobal.com/2026-03-30/cov…
2/12
"The diagnosis is widely shared," the article notes, as it quotes Yang Weimin, a former deputy director of the CFEAC, that “The reason for China’s low share of consumption in total demand is mainly the low share of residents’ income in national income.”
3/12
This isn't new. A few of us have been arguing for 10-15 years that China's trade and investment imbalances and its soaring debt are all the result of a highly distorted distribution of income in which households directly and indirectly retain an astonishingly low share. Image
Read 12 tweets
Apr 1
1/6
FT editorial: "Other governments have not done much to play the role the US once did of seeking to anchor the world trading system. Mark Carney, Canada’s prime minister, and others have been talking about an alliance of middle powers seeking to save...
ft.com/content/0ed61c…
2/6
multilateral trade. So far, this has mainly been conspicuous by its absence."

Of course it has. That's because for all the huffing and puffing, "the world" is not looking for someone to bring order to the world trading system.
3/6
It is looking for someone to stabilize the rising volatility in global trade by permanently absorbing – as the US has done for decades – the bulk of the huge and highly distorting trade imbalances created by aggressively mercantilist policies in trade-surplus countries.
Read 6 tweets
Apr 1
1/12
On the centennial of Britain's 1926 general strike, the FT reviews three new books that discuss and explain the events that year. I haven't read them (although I'd love to do so), but it is worth noting what those events tell us about current conditions.
ft.com/content/ab0875…
2/12
Although most stories of the general strike discuss it in terms of good guys and bad guys (mine owners or workers, depending on your political preferences), in fact both sides were caught up in a structural trap that neither could resolve.
3/12
In the 1920s, Britain remained the world's largest coal producer, but it was increasingly uncompetitive with German, American, Polish and Soviet coal. The main reason may have been the seriously overvalued currency (which also undermined British manufacturing at the time.)
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(