Good morning and welcome to this inter-denominational and indeed inter religious service. The topic of my exhortation today is "Woe to the Wicked Harlot" and my reading is taken from the Book of 1 Kings 3:16-28.
The First Book of Kings in the Old Testament begins with the declining strength of possibly the greatest King in the history of Israel, King David. Before his death, David gave some wise counsel to his son, Solomon who ultimately took his place and the King of Israel.
In Chapter 3 of the 1 Kings, Solomon did something that pleased the Lord greatly. After offering an acceptable sacrifice to the Lord, King Solomon was given a blank cheque to state what he wanted by God. In a move that pleasantly surprised the Lord, King Solomon asked for wisdom.
The Bible said that the Lord was so pleased with what Solomon had asked that He not only blessed Solomon with wisdom, but also gave him what he did not ask for, riches and honour so that they shall not arise any King like him, before and after him.
My message today is not about King Solomon or his predecessor, David. Rather the above was to provide context for the source of the wisdom that enabled Solomon to tackle one of the villains that he faced, the Wicked Harlot.
The Bible records in 1 Kings Chapter 3 vs 16 that one of the earliest cases that King Solomon was faced with was that of two harlots. These two women lived in the same house, and both were pregnant about the same time and gave birth to two children within 3 days of each other.
While the two harlots safely delivered their children, regrettably (but as sometimes the case in life) one child died while another child lived. Next came a dispute as to which of the harlots had the living child (claimed by both) and consequentially, who had the dead child.
At the prompting of the wise King Solomon, the harlot whose child had died, urged King Solomon to divide the living child into two and hand his corpse to both women. In other words, instead of my roommate to have a living child while mine is dead, let her child be killed.
The aspiration to lead the Nigerian Bar Association can be likened to a pregnancy. While different persons (or campaign teams) aspire to win election to the Presidency of the Association, only one person/team can succeed in delivering a living child while the opposing camp(s)...
... must of necessity lead to a miscarriage, a stillbirth or indeed a dead child, as was the case of the Wicked Harlot in 1 Kings Chapter 3.
What has transpired since the ECNBA declared the results of the 2020 NBA Election by declaring the winner of the election and by implication, the losers as well has been nothing short of extraordinary. But as the Bible also tells us, there is nothing new under the sun.
By design or default, for possibly the first time since the NBA was established, we heard about the formation of a splinter group under the appellation, New Nigerian Bar Association. While it was obvious to all the immediate cause of that venture, to the discerning mind...
... a group of people appear to have sworn to themselves that rather than allow the woman go home with her living child, they shall do everything possible to ensure that the living child is killed so that everyone can go home "equal".
After the NBA President reached out to all camps firstly through the content and tone of his inaugural address and also by immediately convening a meeting of leaders of the Northern Geopolitical Zone to address the perceived division in the Association, we thought it was uhuru.
When the news first filtered in that the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation had amended certain provisions of the RPC, it first sounded like a joke until it didn't. The question of whether the amendment will stand or stand has been addressed by the NBA President...
... and indeed it is gratifying to hear that there are ongoing engagements between the NBA President and the Honourable Attorney General of the Federation. This is not intended to jeopardize that. Thus on this, I shall say no more. For now.
What is interesting is that the same group of persons (camps) who have demonstrated in words & conduct, in public and in private, that they won't rest until the living child is killed, have continued beating the drums of war. Elders who ordinarily ought to dish out wise counsel.
It is to this group that I shall say this day, "How is it that ye have agreed together to tempt the Spirit of the Lord? Behold, the feet of them which have buried thy husband are at the door, and shall carry thee out." He that has ears, let him hear what the Spirit is saying.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In recent times, I have been seeing tweets asking what became of the criminal trial involving Senator Orji Uzor Kalu, former Governor of Abia State, Senator representing Abia North Senatorial Zone and the Senate Chief Whip. Those tweets also piqued my interest and got me digging.
I present to you an intriguing case that raises several questions about the Nigerian criminal justice system. This is merely an informative or, if you like, educative thread and will not involve my personal views. Also, everything here is sourced from publicly available info.
About 16 years ago, precisely in the year 2007, the Federal Republic of Nigeria acting through the EFCC commenced criminal proceedings against Senator Orji Uzor Kalu; Ude Udeogu, former Director of Finance & Accounts; and Slok Nigeria Limited, a company belonging to Senator Kalu.
1. For decades, something critical has been missing in the justice delivery system in Nigeria - the lack of clarity regarding the jurisprudential or ideological leanings of our Justices, especially the Law Lords at the Supreme Court. In a way this shouldn't have been a surprise.
2. The best thing a country's justice system can offer the business community is legal certainty. It is secondary if court decisions are wrong, or wrath injustice. What is primary is that the legal community must be able to consistently prophesy with a reasonable degree ...
... of accuracy, what the courts of the country will do when presented with any given situation. One way to achieve that is by being able to decipher the ideological leanings of the Justices, especially of the policy court.
I will start this thread with a quote from a tweet by @OmoGbajaBiamila earlier today, “[d]emocracy guarantees your right to freedom of choice. However, that choice of yours is up for debate, questioning and critique by others, and that's another right guaranteed by democracy.”
The above has become necessary in view of the torrents of abuses that supporters of Mr. Peter Obi now routinely dish out to anyone who exercises a constitutional right to express an opinion against his candidature. These days, that's all it takes to become public enemy No. 1.
The abuses reached their zenith in the days ahead of the PDP presidential primaries before Peter Obi resigned his membership of the PDP. It got to the extent that Mr. Obi had to publicly censure his supporters and urged them to be of better conduct.
On 25 February 2022, President Muhammadu Buhari reluctantly assented to the new Electoral Act, 2022, but objected to Sec. 84(12) in the Act, and asked the National Assembly to re-consider it. On 9 March 2022, the National Assembly the National Assembly declined this request.
On 16 March 2022, the Hon Attorney General of the Federation while fielding questions from correspondents after the weekly FEC Meeting hinted that the FGN (Executive) is considering suing the National Assembly. On 18 March 2022, the Federal High Court struck down the section.
I have been in law practice for a few years now, at least since November 2012, I have not seen anything like this. In this thread, I will do my best to refrain from calling names but simply state things as they are. I will also not delve into the substance of the judgment.
Sometime in 2009 while serving as a Judge of the SUG High Court of Abia State University, Uturu I was appointed into a judicial panel of inquiry headed by my learned brother as he then was, Hon. Justice Ifeanyi Idika to investigate an act of alleged sabotage by Motorcycle Riders.
The background to this was that for years, Motorcycle riders in ABSU historically increased their fares during examination period to take advantage of students. So the SUG President devised a cerebral means to tackle this. He brought in competition by buying KEKE NAPEP tricycles.
I can't remember the exact figures but the tricycles were operating at half the regular fares that Motorcycles were going for. Something had to give. One morning the students woke up to the news that the KEKE NAPEPs had been grounded. How? Someone poured salts in their engines.
On my way to work today, while catching up on my myriads of unread WhatsApp messages, I decided to scan through the compilation of newspaper headlines and one caught my attention, "Senate mulls life imprisonment for kidnappers." I got confused 😕 What's the Senate's business?
I was confused because the last time I was taught Constitutional Law in school, I knew it was not within the legislative competence of the National Assembly to make law on crimes (except in specific cases) except for the FCT. So I decided to read at least 3 versions of the story.
It turns out that there is indeed a bill before the Senate sponsored by Senator Ibikunle Amosun which has already scaled 2nd reading. The bill seeks to introduce stiffer punishments & punitive measures to combat and prevent kidnapping or abduction in Nigeria.