Camilo Montoya-Galvez Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
The scope of the Trump admin.'s COVID policy of expelling migrant children, without affording them humanitarian protections enshrined in US law, was revealed Friday.

8,800 minors apprehended without adult family members have been expelled since March. 1/
cbsnews.com/news/8800-migr…
In addition to 8,800 unaccompanied minors, 7,600 members of migrant families with children were also expelled by border officials.

In total, 159,000 expulsions have been carried under this indefinite pandemic policy, which was authorized by CDC Director Robert Redfield. 2/
How big of a shift is this? US law allows border-crossers to fight their deportation by requesting asylum.

The Trump admin. has worked to restrict asylum for 3 + years, arguing it is abused. But it has never been able to summarily expel migrants—let alone children—until now. 3/
Migrant kids have extra legal safeguards.

A Bush-era law requires officials to transfer most unaccompanied children to the US refugee agency, which works to release them to US sponsors / family members

Unlike adults, they can request asylum via a non-adversarial process. 4/
In addition to asylum, migrant children can obtain US refuge through visas for neglected, abused or abandoned minors.

All minors—both unaccompanied & those with parents—are protected under the Flores court settlement. Families are not supposed to be detained for 20 + days. 5/
The Trump admin (and to some extent, the Obama admin) has argued these safeguards encourage unauthorized migration, particularly from Central America.

Advocates say these asylum and anti-trafficking protections are critical for migrants fleeing violence, especially children. 6/
Now, citing the need to contain coronavirus, the Trump admin. has been able to suspend these safeguards for most. It argues they're superseded by public health law during a pandemic.

Despite authorizing it, the CDC has said little about this policy and faced little scrutiny. 7/
The Trump admin. is telling federal courts that allowing migrant children to stay in the US while their cases are adjudicated would overburden US refugee agency shelters and ICE family detention centers, making it harder to contain the coronavirus inside these facilities. 8/
Advocates like @L_Toczylowski say there are safe ways to allow children to seek US refuge.

"To find out that our gov't has literally taken children who are seeking protection and sent them back to the very places they fled in such high numbers really took my breath away." 9/
In 1 month, a CDC rule will take effect codifying its authority to give US immigration officials the power to bypass protections for asylum-seekers and migrant children during a pandemic.

Keep following @CBSNews. We'll continue to cover this policy. end/
cbsnews.com/news/8800-migr…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Camilo Montoya-Galvez

Camilo Montoya-Galvez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @camiloreports

Mar 10
One of the reasons immigration is such an intractable issue in the US is because the discourse on it is riddled with misleading / false narratives that lack nuance and extreme positions.

A thread about what I've been thinking about lately as immigration becomes a top 2024 issue:
2/ If you only listen to one side, everyone coming to the U.S. southern border is a bad person, a criminal or someone gaming the system.

If you only listen to the other side, everyone coming to the border is an asylum-seeker fleeing imminent harm.

Both narratives are false.
3/ If you only listen to one side, there's no migrant crisis, despite an unprecedented influx and its humanitarian, operational and security implications.

If you listen to the other side, there's an "invasion." But there's no military assault. Border towns are not under attack.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 12
NEWS — Migrants in Mexico have made over 64.3 million requests to enter the U.S. using a smartphone app that the Biden administration has tried to establish as the main gateway to the American asylum system, internal documents obtained by CBS News show.
cbsnews.com/news/immigrati…
Yes, you read that right. Migrants have used the "CBP One" app tens of millions of times to apply for a coveted appointment to be processed by U.S. authorities at an official border crossing.

So far, nearly 450,000 migrants have been allowed into the U.S. under the process.
The number of requests does not represent unique individuals, since it includes repeated attempts by the same people. Nonetheless, the figure illustrates the extraordinarily high demand among migrants to come to the U.S. and the desperation that leads many to try again and again.
Read 6 tweets
Jan 15
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is demanding that Texas state officials stop blocking Border Patrol agents from a public park in Eagle Pass, threatening legal action and calling the state's move to seize control of the area "clearly unconstitutional."

Full letter:
Image
Image
DHS is giving Texas until the end of the day on Wednesday to say it "will cease and desist its efforts to block Border Patrol’s access in and around the Shelby Park area and remove all barriers to access to the U.S.-Mexico border."

Otherwise, DHS will refer the matter to DOJ.
Story: The Biden administration demanded that Texas officials stop preventing Border Patrol agents from entering a section of the U.S. southern border commandeered by state National Guard soldiers last week, calling the actions "clearly unconstitutional.”
cbsnews.com/news/eagle-pas…
Read 4 tweets
Dec 12, 2023
NEWS — The Biden administration has indicated to Congress that it's open to a new Title 42-like border authority to expel migrants without asylum screenings, as well as an expansion of immigration detention and deportations, to get GOP to back Ukraine aid.
cbsnews.com/news/immigrati…
In recent days, the Biden administration has intensified its engagement with lawmakers negotiating a border-Ukraine deal. DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas started engaging with negotiators in the Senate this week.

He's currently on Capitol Hill.
This is what I have been told the White House would be willing to support:

- A Title 42-like authority to summarily expel migrants, pause US asylum law, without a public health justification

- A nation-wide expansion of expedited removal

- Mandatory detention for new arrivals
Read 6 tweets
Sep 20, 2023
BREAKING — The Biden administration will be offering more than 400,000 Venezuelan migrants in the U.S. legal status and work permits through an expansion of the TPS program following demands from New York and other cities, three sources tell @CBSNews.
cbsnews.com/news/venezuela…
The Department of Homeland Security is expanding, or redesignating, the Temporary Protected Status program for Venezuelan migrants, allowing more recent arrivals to apply for the deportation protections and work permits offered by the policy, the sources said.
The move is a victory for congressional Democrats and leaders in large cities like New York, who for months have been pressuring the federal government to grant migrants in their communities legal status so they can work legally more quickly and not rely on local services
Read 6 tweets
May 10, 2023
A thread on our reporting: The Biden administration is planning to replace Title 42 with a policy that is, in many ways, tougher — and I think that has been overlooked.

This rule will disqualify most non-Mexican migrants from asylum if they enter the U.S. without permission. 1/
The regulation will subject migrants to swift, formal deportations to their home country or Mexico, a five year banishment from the U.S. and potential criminal prosecution if they try to re-enter. Title 42 did not impose these immigration or criminal consequences on migrants. 2/
While Title 42 allowed the U.S. to cite public health concerns to expel hundreds of thousands of migrants without hearing their asylum claims, it encouraged some migrants who were expelled to Mexico without any of the aforementioned consequences to make repeat border crossings 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(