JFPuget 💉💉💉🇺🇦 Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 3 tweets 1 min read Read on X
American puritans at play against a French film, cuties. It depicts a reality the film maker, a woman, wanted to show, see her words below. Puritans make misleading comments about a film they haven't watched. There is no child pornography in this movie. Silly #cancelNetflix Image
Citation is from NY Times paper nytimes.com/2020/09/12/mov…
And I don't care about Netflix. I care about censorship.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with JFPuget 💉💉💉🇺🇦

JFPuget 💉💉💉🇺🇦 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JFPuget

Oct 25, 2020
As a transition from debunking disinformation to kaggling here is a thread debunking several myths about Kaggle, including lack of relevance to real world, overfiting, automl performance on kaggle, etc. Bear with me. 1/N
I am discussing Kaggle competitions. Kaggle is more than that, way more even, but competitions is what interest me most on Kaggle. The first myth about Kaggle is that it is irrelevant to real world. There are several ways to address that. 2/N
First, why would companies pay Kaggle to host a competition? It must be that these companies see some benefit out of it. Second, Kaggle hosts science competitions where the challenge is to advance state of the art in some specific domains. 3/N
Read 16 tweets
May 18, 2020
Ils est tres malin @raoult_didier : en testant massivement a Marseille il inclue des asymtomatiques dans le statistiques, et le nombre de cas graves par cas detecte est plus faible qu'ailleurs. Je suis surpris que ce point ne soit pas plus discute. 1/n
Le faible nombre de cas grave (ou deces) par cas detecte est pourtant l'argument principal utilise maintenant pour "prouver" que son traitement marche.

Il repose sur l'idee fallacieuse que la proportion de cas detectes est la meme partout en France.

2/n
Et pourtant il est facile de voir que plus un pays teste, plus la letalite du virus est faible.

Bref, il y a deux facons de faire baisser un taux: baisser le numerateur (soigner les gens), ou augmenter le denominateur (tester plus de gens) 3/n
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(