Patrick Lohlein Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 9 tweets 2 min read Read on X
Free market fantasist often claim that laws and regulations stand in the way of business, but the example in this story indicate the opposite.
When men of power are not constrained by the rule of law, the costs of doing business can quickly rise to unsustainable levels.
1/
While the example is of a factory in Nigeria, I have seen many similar cases in Asian countries. Investors discover the need to pay spurious "fees" on services, traders unable to clear their goods without paying exorbitant bribes... many sad tales often ending in bankruptcy.
2/
Experiences like this show that those who see all laws and regulations as nothing more than "obstructive and superfluous red tape" are wrong.
In truth, some laws and regulations play a very positive for business. They can butter the path to profit rather than obstruct it.
3/
Most importantly, it's the rule of law which decides whether regulations are costs or benefits. When all companies play by the same rules you have a level playing field. When some of your competitors are bribing officials to get around those rules this no longer is the case.
4/
The ability to pay a one-off "fee" to circumvent some "annoying red tape" may appeal to some who have not experienced life in countries where this is the norm.
But businesses from such countries dream of the rule of law - a key reason why they traditionally invest in the UK.
5/
They also appreciate the fact that they will be treated fairly and equally, that courts will judge disputes according to the merit of a case, without bias to whether a business is owned nationals, foreigners or the state. We're used to this here and take it for granted.
6/
But those of us who have done business in countries that do not have strong culture of the rule of law know that its merits outweigh the costs.
This is why we are so alarmed when politicians in countries that ought to know better become willing to bend or break the law.
7/
Whether this is deliberately ignored or unknown to the think tankers who want us to emulate such economies is a moot point. Most are young men with no business experience, let alone of the East, aside perhaps a short trip which left fond impressions of skyscrapers. So naive...
8/
NB. Some people are misinterpreting this tweet. It's an argument for the rule of law and against the binary simplism that that sees all regulation as either bad or good. I am a free market pragmatist, opposed to overregulation.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Patrick Lohlein

Patrick Lohlein Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @patricklohlein

Oct 24, 2021
People commenting on the Environment Bill and the "watering down" of amendment 45 may wish to read the actual texts
bills.parliament.uk/bills/2593/pub…

Or this short explainer thread 👇

1/12
This bill tightens up a lot of environmental regulation, incl. the Water Industry Act 1991 (Sewage Services).

In relationto this @HouseofCommons actually adopted most of Lords amendment 45 on Storm Overflows (votes.parliament.uk/Votes/Commons/…) - with the exception of lines 7 to 14.

2/12
So the questions to ask are:
A) what is the reasoning for excluding these lines?
B) what would have happened if these lines were included?
C) is the government doing anything else in relation to this issue which is not included in the bill?

3/12
Read 14 tweets
Oct 24, 2021
It may sound "geeky", but this in fact the only genuinely contentious issue over what is the very limited role of the ECJ in the Northern Ireland Protocol
1/
Contrary to claims elsewhere, Northern Ireland is not in the EU Single Market, but only in its Single Market for goods. This means trade in goods is covered by its regulatory regime for which the ECJ is the ultimate arbitrator
2/
For most goods, this is not contentious. E.g. If Germany and the EU think a certain standard for car seat belts needs slight changes, who is really going argue with that?
3/
Read 5 tweets
Oct 23, 2021
This interview by @haynesdeborah of former spy Christopher Steele is generating lots of excitement, but the most important question is being overlooked:

"Going back to absolutely basic principles here: What were the Russians trying to achieve..."
1/
As the bulk of the interview concerns Trump and then Brexit, people opposed to either (or both) are jumping to conclusions that reinforce their existing views.

But was this really the primary goal of what the Russians were trying to achieve?

2/
The interview mentions another point for which there is stronger evidence, but this is being overlooked.

What if the purpose was simply to destabilise our democracies by exploiting existing fault lines to "sow divsion" and create irreconcilable conflict in our societies?👇

3/ Image
Read 8 tweets
Feb 13, 2021
Interesting claim by @Lorand_Bartels that the UK may have "a good case" against the EU at the WTO if it *continues* to deny long-term equivalence recognition for financial services.
1/ telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/…
It is true that "selective treatment of one state for political reasons breaches the non-discrimination principle of the WTO" and this applies to services as Article VII of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) makes clear in paragraph 3.
2/
However, given that the EU-UK TCA contains declarations to negotiate a deal on financial services, the EU can surely argue that it is abiding by Article VII as it is "affording adequate opportunity" to reach an accord with the UK, as it is required by paragraph 2.
3/
Read 6 tweets
Jan 5, 2021
This is not about the EU, but about your claims that gravity matters less for services and my question over what type of services the UK can hope to export to Asia. As much as I wish the latter were true, I have to disagree and shed some light on the data you use.
(Thread)
1/
Starting with the stats, a caveat. "Non-EU" includes Norway and Switzerland. If we look at the continent as a whole, service exports to Europe are over 50%. Of the rest, about half go to the USA and the rest goes to the "rest of world" - incl. Asia, but let's start with USA.
2/
While the population of the USA is smaller than that of Europe, the fact that we sell more than 2x as much in Europe can be explained by 2 factors: proximity and ease of market access.
Language clearly isn't a factor. If you have another explanation, then please enlighten us.
3/
Read 16 tweets
Jan 4, 2021
This story is being interpreted a consequence of Brexit, but it's really a consequence of new VAT rules on imports to the UK from last year. The only Brexit link is that EU trade is no longer exempt from these rules as the UK has left the Single Market
1/5 bbc.com/news/business-…
The @BBCNews article correctly explains this:
"VAT is now being collected at the point of sale rather than at the point of importation, a change that HMRC says will ensure that goods from EU and non-EU countries are treated in the same way."
2/5
"This essentially means that overseas retailers sending goods to the UK are expected to register for UK VAT and account for it to HMRC if the sale value is less than €150 (£135)."

... which is a major pain, and probably not worth it unless you are selling large quantities.
3/5
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(