A Hindu marriage can happen only between a man and woman. If a couple doesn't fulfill the criteria, it's simply not eligible for marriage. It doesn't need to be explicitly stated which is a given truth affirmed in Dharmashastra-s again and again.
The purpose of Hindu vivaha is to beget children, perform the rituals and walk together on the path of Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha. A same sex marriage can't fulfill either of the purpose as they can't beget children nor perform the rituals meant for married couple.
Vedic Yajnas or any other ritual explicitly states that it has to be a man and woman as husband and wife as Yajmans. There is no compromise on it. Your modernity can't dictate how we approach Dharma and conduct ourselves. Same sex couples don't meet the criteria of marriage.
There is another issue which is related to difference between law and legislation. A law is a tradition and embodiment of truths which already exist in the society but a legislation is a policy device for social engineering. I'm thankful to F A Hayek for the insight.
Hindu Code Bill was a legislation because it was a bill aimed at engineering of Hindu society by marking a distinct break from the tradition of Hindu laws. Dharmashastra-s were repudiated for modern objectives. The legislation opens the door for political activism.
Now, the law is not a device which gives justice in case someone has faced something wrong but it has become another path of implementing legislations which can't be enacted by legislature, thus forcing the view of court based on the philosophical assumptions of judges.
I would like to remember Justice Scallia of US Supreme Court who always held that if you wish to enact a law, persuade your legislature to enact it but don't expect courts to create laws from the top for your liberal causes.
Judges in India aren't aware of any such limits and in order to be progressive, they'll transgress their limits and enact legislations from the top.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Satish Verma

Satish Verma Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @satoverma

18 Sep
This is the classical way of a Communist framing the debate based on his own terms and trapping you. First, why should 'communal violence' by differentiated from the other form of organized violence which Communists practice? Let's look at every type of violence.
If we fall in this trap, even Stalin would emerge as a noble man because he didn't organize any communal violence but merely killed millions of innocent farmers for being bourgeois. Political violence and class violence driven by Communist ideology must be considered.
In West Bengal alone, during the three decades of Communist rule, more than 50,000 political killing was done by Communists. This was officially accepted by Buddhadeb Bhattacharya in West Bengal assembly. Why should we overlook this fact?
Read 12 tweets
8 Sep
Raita wing feminists having 'Shakti complex' have started the usual narrative of misogyny and patriarchy in the case of mocking of our deities by neo-atheists because they used the morph pictures of our goddesses.
Let's be very clear that this narrative is nothing but obfuscation of the actual intent and issue because this group can't think beyond misogyny and patriarchy like certain people can't think beyond brown and white.
The intent was to mock Hindu goddesses because Hindus worship them driven by their Abrahamic zeal even though they're declared atheists combined with the edgy attitude of Neo-Atheism which denigrates our sacred symbols.
Read 5 tweets
3 Sep
Having observed Indic crowd for the sufficient period of time, I think it's time for me to identify myself as Indic as benefits of being Indic are immense.

1. An Indic guy always adds indic in everything. Even death has to be Indic.
2. Reasoning and thought is replaced with the standard phrase 'This is Abrahamic, hence rejected.'

3. No need to have epistemological and metaphysical principles. Just oscillate from one end to another.
4. If someone says that Abrahmics also inhale oxygen, Indic person would say that they are the oldest pagans of the world and don't follow this Abrahmic practice of inhaling oxygen.

5. Ask their opinion about an economic issue. They'll tell that they will think in Indic way.
Read 4 tweets
20 Aug
Journalists know nothing about Economics yet they give such ridiculous comparison. Market capitalization and GDP are not comparable. GDP is the sum of monetary value goods and services produced in a year in a country or region.
But, market capitalization is merely a measure of its worth in the stock market. It doesn't give an idea about the monetary value of goods or services produced by the company. The revenue of a company is the measure of that.
So, if you compare GDP of a country with any company, it should be the revenue of the company. The revenue of Apple was $265 for 2018 which is roughly 1/10th of the Indian economy. To illustrate, how ridiculous this comparison of GDP and market capitalization is-
Read 5 tweets
16 Aug
This typically happens when you neither understand the position of your opponents nor what you accuse them to be. Moral relativism is as old as the field of philosophy viz. Sophists in Greece used to advance a form of moral relativism.
Moral relativism has two components: Descriptive Moral Relativism (DMR) and Metaethical Moral Relativism (MMR). DMR is nothing but empirical fact that different society and culture have different form of morals. It doesn't include any normative evaluation.
MMR on the other hand is the position that considering that the moral standards of different societies are radically different, no moral judgment can be given objectively and the standard of justification itself differs in different societies.
Read 8 tweets
9 Aug
It's amazing to see how Hindus walk straight into the trap laid by Marxists and Leftists whenever Kalinga war is mentioned. Kalinga War was a conflict between the armies of two states – Maurya and Kalinga.
In accordance with the prevailing norms of war, there is no record to show that Mauryan soldiers killed non-soldier citizens, enslaved women or took children as slave. What's there to apologize and feel remorseful about the soldiers fallen in the war?
There were massive casualties from both the sides as it happens in any large scale conflict. Whether Ashoka converted into Buddhism before the Kalinga war or after the war is immaterial.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!