Tesla is continually misunderstood by markets & media because it's hard to model a feedback loop that cuts across functional silos in excel. Linear models and systems thinking are oil and water. To help our analyst friends, I'll list out 10 feedback loops that Tesla has going:
1. Cars sold emit data, which accelerates motor & battery software optimization, which improves power efficiency, which reduces batteries needed, which reduces cost, which reduces price, which increases demand, which increases cars on the road, which emit even more data, & so on.
2. Tesla insurance uptake creates data about repair costs, which informs design & manufacturing choices, which reduce repair costs, which reduces cost of insuring a Tesla, which can reduce price of insuring a Tesla which leads to more Teslas sold, and more insurance uptake, ...
3. Tesla being the #1 buyer of li-ion batteries in the world makes them the first point of call when someone has a breakthrough. Which accumulates more breakthroughs, sells more cars, increases the amount of li-ion batteries they buy, ...
4. Tesla has accomplished some of the most audacious engineering feats in recent memory. Which attracts the world's best engineers to want to work there. Which creates an incredibly high-quality team, accomplishing even more audacious engineering feats, ...
5. Tesla's expanding technology lead (due to many of the above) makes a lot of the established manufacturers realize they can't really compete, which makes them underinvest in EV tech and milk ICE instead, which increases Tesla's technology lead, and so on.
6. Tesla's widespread supercharger network leads more EV buyers to buy Tesla, which increases their ability to build out the supercharger network, which leads even more EV buyers to buy Tesla, ...
7. Tesla's expertise at building factories capital efficiently gets them low overhead on their cars, allows them to reduce prices, which increases demand, which requires them to build more factories, which they can keep getting better at building efficiently, ...
8. Tesla's super high customer satisfaction means a buyer of Tesla cars is an evangelist who gives test drives, which causes more people to buy Tesla cars, ...
9. Elon's super-short feedback loop on Twitter with Tesla customers asking for features and fixes means the cars are ever more closely aligned to what customers want, which increases demand, which increases feedback, ...
10. And I haven't even mentioned Autopilot! This one is easy, but here goes: More cars sold -> more miles driven -> more data available -> better Autopilot performance -> more cars sold (eventually also as robotaxis) -> ...
The spreadsheet-literate of you will notice that so many of the above are super hard to model using traditional tools. Nevermind when all these loops are running in parallel. There is a discipline that addresses this, called System Dynamics, but for some reason is not well known.
Let's add 3 more loops to the mix that are Elon-specific: 1. Elon is constantly learning how to imagine and realize new projects, adapt to opportunity and/or adversity. The better he gets at it, the better his companies get at it, and that has to count for something.
2. Elon is constantly jousting with the best engineers across his companies. He learns new things every day and cross-polinates his companies (e.g. various SpaceX/Tesla collaborations). The more of this he does, the better his companies do, the more smart people he can learn from
3. Elon set his compensation package up so that he owns more of Tesla, the better Tesla does. But that bigger percentage will be worth more the better Tesla does. Which proceeds he plans to use to fund Mars colonization. And what is more valuable than making life multi-planetary?
Watching the last @stevenmarkryan video, he actually named a few more! 1. As Tesla optimizes its manufacturing, it will make more cars at its existing facilities, further reducing cost per car, reducing price, increasing demand and profits, hiring more talent, to optimize faster.
2. The more cars are sold, the more tesla can invest in software add-ons, increasing high margin revenue per car further, which can be used to hire more software engineers to work on more software add-ons, which will further drive software subscription revenue, etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's do a thread doing a close reading of Douglas Murray's article in the NY Post, in which he writes about his encounter with Dave Smith on Joe Rogan's podcast.
If you care about facts and truth and stuff, I promise this will be highly illuminating. 🧵
"Having not spoken to Joe since the wars in Ukraine and Israel started, I had become increasingly irked that the guests he has had on have been almost entirely anti-Ukraine and anti-Israel."
As many have demonstrated, this is false.
Since late 2023, at the very least these guests with strong pro-israel views have appeared at least once on the podcast.
Gad Saad
Mike Baker
Peter Zeihan
Douglas Murray
Coleman Hughes
Konstantin Kisin (3 times)
So, the Ukranian constitution gives the president the power to declare martial law, and explicitly says that parliamentary elections can be delayed until after martial law is lifted. For presidential elections it says they must happen every 5 years with no martial law exception.
Whitney Webb's failure to admit error, (and how to survive the 2025+ infowars without getting blackpilled)
I had a run-in with Whitney Webb this week. This THREAD will try to walk you through the story in excruciating detail.
This will take a while, but I think it's worth it.
It all started when @BretWeinstein thanked @POTUS for withdrawing from the WHO. Bret had fought long and hard against the WHO pandemic treaty that was being pushed, so whoever had followed him knows how important this is.
@BretWeinstein @POTUS Whitney Webb felt the need to point out that "Trump also left the WHO in mid-2020 and then just redirected what was once WHO funding to the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance."
Your favorite blackpill dealer, Whitney Webb, here with more trash data and vague insinuations.
In this episode, she claims Trump "redirected" WHO funding to GAVI. In reality, she is asserting that unrelated funding from USAID to GAVI was made because of the withdrawal from WHO in 2020.
The USAID funding to GAVI was part of a long-term funding stream that USAID had been providing to GAVI since 2001.
Some people are saying that maybe the 1.4B in 2016-2020 was concentrated in 2020. Not true. A billion was pledged for the period of 2015-2018. Then 1.16 billion was pledged for the period between 2020-2023. Taking inflation into account, that is effectively the same amount, for the same duration of time.
In trying to keep up with the vast pace of developments across many fronts, I have started to hypothesize something. Perhaps it is oversimplified. Perhaps it is just wrong. I am open to all eventualities, I'm sharing this to get feedback.
When Mike Johnson did his complete turnaround, I started to wonder what he could possibly have been told that changed his view so drastically. It is tempting to think it was some personal threat to his reputation or family. But that is a low-context explanation that could apply to anything, and as such is not very informative, imo.
What if, what he was told, is that what is going on is pretty much the opening moves for WW3? See the map below and think about what was recently approved with the help of Mike Johnson:
- Warrantless wiretapping
- TikTok forced sale or banning
- Funding for Ukraine
- Funding for Israel
- Funding for Taiwan
- No funding for strenghtening the border (and actually perhaps some funding to get *more* people into the US)
Basically, infowar funding for the internals of the empire, and actual war funding to support the borderlands (Taiwan, Israel, Ukraine) against the rising BRICS powers. And an entry to the US of cheap workforce that will be needed to set up a new industrial base. At best we end up with a new Cold War. If we're lucky.
Maybe I'm giving people in power more credit than they're worth. Perhaps I refuse to believe they're simply arrogant and incompetent. But for better or worse, I can't stop thinking about this map, and what it means for the world.
I may have classified some countries wrong, by the way, I'm open to suggestions on specifics. In particular, It's likely that Hungary and Serbia should be at the very least a kind of greyzone. Also, US influence in south Asia probably goes further than I marked. And of course Africa is a competition zone, with Russia and China making inroads and France/EU losing ground, but nothing yet completely settled.
Anyway, hopefully this is interesting to others as it was to me. (runs away and hides in bunker)
Was about to mention that the poles are about to become a zone of intense competition between the blocks.