Tesla is continually misunderstood by markets & media because it's hard to model a feedback loop that cuts across functional silos in excel. Linear models and systems thinking are oil and water. To help our analyst friends, I'll list out 10 feedback loops that Tesla has going:
1. Cars sold emit data, which accelerates motor & battery software optimization, which improves power efficiency, which reduces batteries needed, which reduces cost, which reduces price, which increases demand, which increases cars on the road, which emit even more data, & so on.
2. Tesla insurance uptake creates data about repair costs, which informs design & manufacturing choices, which reduce repair costs, which reduces cost of insuring a Tesla, which can reduce price of insuring a Tesla which leads to more Teslas sold, and more insurance uptake, ...
3. Tesla being the #1 buyer of li-ion batteries in the world makes them the first point of call when someone has a breakthrough. Which accumulates more breakthroughs, sells more cars, increases the amount of li-ion batteries they buy, ...
4. Tesla has accomplished some of the most audacious engineering feats in recent memory. Which attracts the world's best engineers to want to work there. Which creates an incredibly high-quality team, accomplishing even more audacious engineering feats, ...
5. Tesla's expanding technology lead (due to many of the above) makes a lot of the established manufacturers realize they can't really compete, which makes them underinvest in EV tech and milk ICE instead, which increases Tesla's technology lead, and so on.
6. Tesla's widespread supercharger network leads more EV buyers to buy Tesla, which increases their ability to build out the supercharger network, which leads even more EV buyers to buy Tesla, ...
7. Tesla's expertise at building factories capital efficiently gets them low overhead on their cars, allows them to reduce prices, which increases demand, which requires them to build more factories, which they can keep getting better at building efficiently, ...
8. Tesla's super high customer satisfaction means a buyer of Tesla cars is an evangelist who gives test drives, which causes more people to buy Tesla cars, ...
9. Elon's super-short feedback loop on Twitter with Tesla customers asking for features and fixes means the cars are ever more closely aligned to what customers want, which increases demand, which increases feedback, ...
10. And I haven't even mentioned Autopilot! This one is easy, but here goes: More cars sold -> more miles driven -> more data available -> better Autopilot performance -> more cars sold (eventually also as robotaxis) -> ...
The spreadsheet-literate of you will notice that so many of the above are super hard to model using traditional tools. Nevermind when all these loops are running in parallel. There is a discipline that addresses this, called System Dynamics, but for some reason is not well known.
Let's add 3 more loops to the mix that are Elon-specific: 1. Elon is constantly learning how to imagine and realize new projects, adapt to opportunity and/or adversity. The better he gets at it, the better his companies get at it, and that has to count for something.
2. Elon is constantly jousting with the best engineers across his companies. He learns new things every day and cross-polinates his companies (e.g. various SpaceX/Tesla collaborations). The more of this he does, the better his companies do, the more smart people he can learn from
3. Elon set his compensation package up so that he owns more of Tesla, the better Tesla does. But that bigger percentage will be worth more the better Tesla does. Which proceeds he plans to use to fund Mars colonization. And what is more valuable than making life multi-planetary?
Watching the last @stevenmarkryan video, he actually named a few more! 1. As Tesla optimizes its manufacturing, it will make more cars at its existing facilities, further reducing cost per car, reducing price, increasing demand and profits, hiring more talent, to optimize faster.
2. The more cars are sold, the more tesla can invest in software add-ons, increasing high margin revenue per car further, which can be used to hire more software engineers to work on more software add-ons, which will further drive software subscription revenue, etc.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The EU has sanctioned Jaques Baud, one of the most lucid and evidence based analysts of the war. Apparently, this means that as a Swiss citizen, he cannot even fly over EU territory, which means he cannot leave his country. This is just one of many consequences the penalty, imposed with no due process or any kind of court hearing, has for this former Swiss intelligence analyst and former NATO advisor.
His crime? Quoting the words of Ukranian officials verbatim. Read on.
This is the entirety of the accusations against Colonel Jaques Baud, as written by the EU: ""Jacques Baud, former colonel of the Swiss army and strategic analyst, is a regular guest on pro-Russian television and radio programs. He acts as a mouthpiece for pro-Russian propaganda and spreads conspiracy theories, for example by accusing Ukraine of having orchestrated its own invasion in order to join NATO. Therefore, Jacques Baud is responsible for actions or political measures attributable to the government of the Russian Federation that undermine or threaten the stability or security in a third country (Ukraine) through participation in the use of information manipulation and influence operations, implements them, or supports them.""
You will note that they accuse him of SPEECH CRIMES only. Now lets dig into the specifics a little because the insanity of the situation is off the charts.
Did you now that the PRINCIPLE trial out of the UK found that IVM was superior to the usual care in practically every subgroup it tested, but it sat on the results for ~600 days? When it finally published, it buried these results in page 346 of the appendix.
The main body of the paper they published is even more bizarre --
1. They claim that "clinically meaningful" meant 1.5 days improvement in median time to recovery. 2. They admit that ivermectin showed >2 days to recovery. 3. Their main conclusion is that ivermectin is unlikely to provide clinically meaningful improvement in recovery.
The secret sauce in their conclusion is that their target metric of HR 1.2 is based on 9 days of recovery needed (after randomization). Even though they had ran many hundreds of patients by the time they started the ivm arm they knew the days needed for recovery were >14.
Let's do a thread doing a close reading of Douglas Murray's article in the NY Post, in which he writes about his encounter with Dave Smith on Joe Rogan's podcast.
If you care about facts and truth and stuff, I promise this will be highly illuminating. 🧵
"Having not spoken to Joe since the wars in Ukraine and Israel started, I had become increasingly irked that the guests he has had on have been almost entirely anti-Ukraine and anti-Israel."
As many have demonstrated, this is false.
Since late 2023, at the very least these guests with strong pro-israel views have appeared at least once on the podcast.
Gad Saad
Mike Baker
Peter Zeihan
Douglas Murray
Coleman Hughes
Konstantin Kisin (3 times)
So, the Ukranian constitution gives the president the power to declare martial law, and explicitly says that parliamentary elections can be delayed until after martial law is lifted. For presidential elections it says they must happen every 5 years with no martial law exception.
Whitney Webb's failure to admit error, (and how to survive the 2025+ infowars without getting blackpilled)
I had a run-in with Whitney Webb this week. This THREAD will try to walk you through the story in excruciating detail.
This will take a while, but I think it's worth it.
It all started when @BretWeinstein thanked @POTUS for withdrawing from the WHO. Bret had fought long and hard against the WHO pandemic treaty that was being pushed, so whoever had followed him knows how important this is.
@BretWeinstein @POTUS Whitney Webb felt the need to point out that "Trump also left the WHO in mid-2020 and then just redirected what was once WHO funding to the Gates-funded GAVI vaccine alliance."