Anton Bukov (e/acc)🦇🔊 Profile picture
Sep 13, 2020 4 tweets 3 min read Read on X
Our small investigation thread (with @semenov_roman_) on @bZxHQ "duplication incident".

We compared source code on @etherscan before and after the fix applied:

etherscan.io/address/0xde74…

etherscan.io/address/0xa7eb…

diffchecker.com/qzTJ7Xee
We realized that initial source code works incorrectly when "_from" equals to "_to" and leads to funds duplication. We found 9 exploiting transactions on $iETH lending token with 101778 $iETH tokens duplicated (worth ~4.7K $ETH) // @DuneAnalytics
Attacker address: etherscan.io/address/0xd1c0…

Stolen funds (~4.7K $ETH):
etherscan.io/address/0xe925…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Anton Bukov (e/acc)🦇🔊

Anton Bukov (e/acc)🦇🔊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @k06a

Oct 15, 2024
1/n

Any veTokenomics fans out there? Huge shoutout to @CurveFinance and @newmichwill for this groundbreaking innovation. Now, get ready for eveTokenomics — an exponential approach where tokenization remains robust, enabling farming and any ERC20-compatible on-chain mechanisms.
2/n

Core issue with linearly decaying balances: over time, participant proportions shift, especially noticeable as lock time becomes zero. eveTokenomics solves this with exponential balance adjustments, keeping participant ratios stable forever.
3/n

Imagine all participant balances decreasing by 0.01% per second. In this setup, balance ratios between participants remain stable over time and almost never hit zero (thanks to 18 decimal places).
Read 6 tweets
Oct 25, 2021
1/ In recent months, I've been asked a lot about a cross-chain future for @1inch. Dozens of projects are actively working on bridges, and some of them have applied for 1inch grants or just asked for my advice/opinion. This thread reveals my thoughts on the subject.
2/ First of all, @1inch already has CEXes' and other blockchains' liquidity bridged by PMMs (professional market makers) via limit order protocols. When users fill their orders, they immediately arbitrage on CEXes to make a profit. Huge trade on @1inch could shift prices on CEXes
3/ Next, @1inch users currently enjoy atomicity of their transactions. This means a tx can have only 2 outcomes once it's been mined: successfully executed or reverted. Bridging assets takes time and involves at least 2 chains, and by its nature it couldn’t be atomic in any sense
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(