There's a name for this, I think, and I can't remember it right now, but sometimes a term covers such a wide swath of behavior that it can really only be used disingenuously, and relies heavily on pre-existing prejudicial context
"Cancel culture" as a phrase is one of those things right now, because on one end of the spectrum, it describes consequences that can be very impactful to someone's life, and on the other end, it's like five anonymous people on twitter disliking something
The right completely took over the phrase, and because the rest of the white political spectrum is either complacent and/or unwilling to cop to their own racism and classism, most of them have accepted this misdefinition too
The intentional non-specificity of the deployment of the phrase has meant that it very quickly became usable in even marginal situations to broadly mean "mob justice"; which is another phrase that's highly contextual as well
The specific thing I'm trying to get at is that the over-broad deployment of these phrases tricks people into accepting whole views of things like justice (specifically protection from the powerful) as bad, a lot of times without really realizing it
Part of that is intentionally carving out cases that could easily be described as "cancel culture," but aren't: Larry Nassar finally being held accountable for decades of abuse should be an example of "cancel culture," because powerless girls and women forced him to justice
But because society can generally get behind that person being held accountable, it's not an example of "mob justice" or "cancel culture." So these things are good or bad depending on an unspoken moral judgment of... the people (not "the mob," weirdly)
People who cry about "cancel culture" eventually tend to start complaining about not wanting "thought crimes" being punishable, but the whole demonization of a phrase that describes the powerless holding the powerful accountable is about the criminalization of powerless folks
"We think justice would lead to a better world" is a thought, a position, and holding powerful people accountable is a necessary step towards that. Thinking and expressing those things is unacceptable to these folks, so... we're thought criminals?
These assholes really think they're neutral and objective, because defaults are always invisible, and they imagine themselves fighting for what one would describe as the default, or status quo, if it was named: for powerless folks not to have power
So it's not that there's a new name for a new behavior called "cancel culture." Terms like "bullying" and "accountability" and "harassment" were all already there. It's that this new term carries the right implications to spread virally among objectivity fetishists
Because the defaults that are baked into an unjust culture are also embedded into the phrase itself, which is then obscured by over-broad deployment, which then allows it to be perceived as a thing that is automaticallg evil, violent, and dangerous to the powerless
It's a very complicated trick, and it's not possible to pull off without the pre-existing scaffolding around other aspects of culture that can be forcefully aligned with this new phrase, like the scaffoldings of anti-Blackness and selective free speech absolutism
So these things, the scaffoldings, are dangerous, but mainstream thought leaders don't want to acknowledge them at all, so you get , for example, JKR complaining about "cancel culture" even if most of the folks resisting her loudly are not Black
That's something with origins in anti-Blackness being deployed into conversations that don't have an explicit anti-Blackness component (yes Black trans folks exist); the tools to marginalize everyone are preceded by the workshopping allowed by cultural anti-Blackness
So, these things don't come out of nowhere, and the effective parts of the sinophobia we're seeing from both presidential candidates will be deployed in other ways too, eventually, because those have a history of deployment as well
But all of this suggests a lot about the complication of these things, and how we don't do justice to important concepts by not understanding how they came to exist and how they came to their current, unspoken mainstream usages
And also why solidarity between communities is absolutely crucial, because the things that work against one broad group of marginalized folks will always be repackaged and reintroduced to beat back other marginalized groups too
You can fight for justice in all kinds of small ways, but at the end of the day there should be the kind of overarching, coherent positions that can only come from cross-community communication and solidarity, because piecemeal change in complicated culture is a whack-a-mole deal
So the least, the very least you can possibly do, is to come to deep understandings of the conditions of injustice experienced by others. Just listening respectfully and coming to understand struggle that you do not experience exponentially adds to your own understandings
I know it might not feel groundbreaking enough to say, but LISTEN to people, kindly and honestly and gently, with caveats of course for, eg, people who don't believe in your fundamental existence as a human being
And if you don't feel like you know enough about "solidarity" and what it looks like and how to practice it, that's okay too. It's more complicated than it sounds and more complicated than people make it out to be. But you can study it specifically, too, first, if you want
We do all want to get there eventually, but it's also true that you don't get there without other communities alongside (not behind) you. White and other majoritized allies often come at this in a dominative way: you bow and we'll let you in
In that formulation, they're making it clear that your issues will always be secondary to whatever the group decides, and that's not solidarity; that's just bullying from the other side of the political spectrum, allowed by the narrow scope of the spectrum in the first place
So figure it out, figure out how to stand with people, to subsume your own issues occasionally in a spirit not of hierarchical dominance, but as an act of love and respect, and understanding that it's definitely all interconnected, and we definitely will and do need each other

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Studio Glibly

Studio Glibly Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NoTotally

29 Sep
I can't search twitter for my previous threads on 14A so let me just go off memory for a second. Just a reminder as to why I think it's important, CRUCIAL in a way that I don't know if people understand
Here's section one of the 14th amendment. There are two important concepts in there that I want to focus on All persons born or natural...
First is the first sentence, which is birthright citizenship. That's something the GOP has long been against, because it wants the post hoc ability to revoke citizenship from people it would like to "deter" from voting. That way they don't even have to gerrymander or intimidate
Read 24 tweets
29 Sep
Officially back on my bullshit* again

*rewatching all of Avenue 5 over and over
Why is Zach Woods so calming to me. Don't answer just know that he is, very much, for some reason
Ok I think I can finally explain the Armando Iannucci comedy model. Which, other shows have done this but I associate it most with his stuff
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep
Lies are not the opposite of the truth, there actually can't be an opposite to platonic truth other than maybe non-existence?
"Truth" exists even outside of human perception, eg there is a correct answer to "is there extraterrestrial life," we just don't have access to it
So if "truth" is truth, it needs to include things that are unknown by us currently and maybe even things that are ultimately unknowable to us
Read 24 tweets
28 Sep
One way toxic parenting can cause continuing difficulties into adulthood even if you've cut off is that you lose all of your past memories of feeling safe, secure, loved
They didn't all go away at once for me. It's been almost a decade since I cut off and now there are very few left
I never went through scanning my memories for those instances, they would just come up instinctually when I needed to feel safe. Tough day at work, just little stuff
Read 7 tweets
27 Sep
One depressing thing is that a lot of people look at avoiding taxes as shrewd business
My main takeaway is that he's massively financially compromised, and even if we suspected that it's important to have it reported out this thoroughly
But also that it's very common corporate accounting to inflate or invent losses in order to create a more beneficial tax situation
Read 4 tweets
27 Sep
Btw this is a good example for understanding a tricky concept revolving around the concept of "equality"
Conditional proximity to whiteness means Asians like me can get away with certain things but there are more things beyond the "bamboo ceiling" and a lot of them are things we shouldn't want to do
In other words, if you're especially a cis straight abled man of color, the urge sometimes is to be fighting for "equality" so that we can be just as shitty as white men and face no consequences, like they often do
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!