Here are 12 things that the news industry should have done between 2016 and now:
1. Commissioned an independent, professional examination of any reporting mistakes and the reasons behind them.
(Read the whole analysis here:…)
2. Issued corrections and, when warranted, apologies regarding any false reporting and implications;

3. Conducted a thorough investigation of who, if anyone, was pulling strings and feeding false information and reported the findings;
4. Pledged not to be a tool for the propagandists’ smear tactic of getting secondary news outlets to publish rumor, innuendo and irresponsible journalism in order to convince legitimate news organizations to cover the questionable story to get “reaction”;
5. Returned to standards regarding anonymous sources — using them primarily to gather on-the-record information from others or only as a last resort to report an important, legitimate story, specifying as much as possible the type of people they are and why they cannot be named
(5. continued) and disclosing any of their potential conflicts of interest;
6. Stopped relying on sources who have provided false information and removed from the ranks of experts, contributors or sources those who promulgated false information;
7. Covered both sides of the story, whether we agreed with a side or not;
8. Held or killed a story that didn’t check out or lacked documentation;
9. Confined political advocacy to the opinion pages;
10. Attributed allegations and claims rather than pretending to know with certainty things we cannot know firsthand;
11. Avoided temptation to form conclusions based on preliminary claims, evidence or information; and
12. When conducting and reporting on polls or consulting political analysts, contextualized their past performance in terms of accuracy.
The entire analysis here:…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️

Sharyl Attkisson🕵️‍♂️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SharylAttkisson

15 Sep
My answer is boringly not succinct. I'll answer on this tweet...
1-I turned 18 freshman year in college... 1st election I could vote in was '80 Reagan-Carter. I didn't even know diff between a D/R. My memory is, and I cd be wrong, but there were students in a dorm registering other students to vote and.. somehow were voting right there (?)
2-So maybe it was an absentee or mail-in ballot. I remember I wasn't interested I registering or voting, I was just there with a friend, but I filled something out and confessed "I have no idea who to vote for," and the kids helping us with ballots or whatnot said..
Read 7 tweets
4 Sep
2-List bullet point campaign accusations against Trump. Biden is under a separate tweet.
I'll start:
*He called fallen troops "losers" and "suckers"
PS the list doesn't mean any are true or not; and some of course have been disproven already
*He colludes with Putin/Russia
Read 5 tweets
25 Aug
1-Bored? I have a short story about the IRS with a surprise ending.
I pay more taxes than I think I owe because I know I’m a possible target.
The last few yrs I pay quarterly taxes, withholding, and still owe more at the end. Then after I pay that, I get more bills from IRS. Image
2-The IRS bills don’t explain what I owe for, but I just pay the because—you know, it’s the IRS.
Same routine this yr: I pay all my taxes, I get another bill. I pay that; I get another bill.
The last bill caught my eye.
3-It said the IRS had taken a “balance owed to me from 2018” and put it toward my newest bill.
“Balance owed to me”??? When/what/why?
I can't find out because the IRS online never lets me login; some flaw.
Read 8 tweets
17 Jul
1-Internal FBI doc:
FBI's Peter Strzok on NYT article:
"This statement is misleading and inaccurate as written. We have not seen evidence of any individuals in contact with Russians (both Governmental and non-Governmental)"…
2-and FBI's Peter Strzok on NYT article: "There is no known intel affiliation, and little if any [government of Russia] affiliation[.]"
3-and FBI's Peter Strzok on NYT article:
"FBI investigation has shown past contact between [Trump campaign volunteer Carter] Page and the SVR [Foreign Intelligence Service of the Russian Federation], but not during his association with the Trump campaign."
Read 12 tweets
13 May
I will lay out my understanding in this thread.
First, intel officials were initially barred under our constitution and laws from capturing innocent Americans on wiretaps and surveillance of foreign officials and terrorists.
Then, they said, “Well, we need to sometimes capture those innocent U.S. citizens ‘incidentally,’ but we won’t store their information. We’ll protect their American rights.”
Then, they said, “Well, we will store the info for just a little while, but we will carefully control access and we will ‘mask’ or hide the identities of the U.S. citizens so they cannot be used for political or nefarious purposes.”
Read 6 tweets
30 Apr
1-In recent wks, @NYT fabricated false info about me in @jwpetersNYT article they had to correct, @Facebook hit me with fake violation after a fake fact-check that used a China coronavirus scientist, Twitter impressions on my posts dial backwards in real time,
2-Google demonetized my website ads due to an article I shared in Jan. about the Trump impeachment “whistleblower,” AP and Vanity Fair randomly brought me up in articles to controversialize me, and Wikipedia agenda editors changed my bio to make it falsely appear
3-as if the forensically-proven government intrusions into my computers never happened, and to falsely and slanderously portray me as anti-vaccine, while removing the citations that show my vaccine reporting has been cited as a reference in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!