Earth is now so far out of equilibrium (at around 1.1°C global mean surface temperature rise) that it is rapidly moving into a state hostile to existing human settlement of the planet. At this temperature, realistic projected costs are off the scale. 1.5°C impacts are unthinkable
Are we going to allow this ongoing disintegration of the physical basis of our civilisation, or use the tools we possess to stop all anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions? That is clearly the only realistic economic course. It needs to done and dusted in the next 10-20 years.
It can be done. The first step,
building massive quantities of wind and solar energy generation and storage (sufficient to transform all technology from fossil fuelled to electric) should be done within 5 years along with intense planning for the following steps.
This may appear an ambitious program in comparison to business as usual, but it may still not prevent peak global mean surface temperature of 1.5°C for a decade or two - long enough to damage much of our existing settlement of the planet.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof Nick Cowern

Prof Nick Cowern Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @NickCowern

29 Apr
Highly significant that the two wealthy western countries with the worst problems of social inequality and deprivation - the US and UK - have accounted for nearly half of all global COVID-19 deaths to date.
I've been asked what evidence I've used to infer that this apparent correlation is "highly significant". Well, here is part of the answer. It's up-to-the-minute information that is directly relevant to the epidemiology of COVID-19.
Those in deprived areas have double death rates of affluent areas, new statistics show. I strongly suspect this explains slowly falling UK hospital admissions at a time when symptomatic cases in the country as a whole have plummeted from 2.1M to 350,000.

theguardian.com/politics/live/…
Read 5 tweets
27 Apr
1/ Stunning insights from the NHS symptom-reporting app. It shows a dramatic decrease in live symptomatic cases, starting on 1st April, just 8 days after the UK lockdown began.
2/ The % decrease is vastly greater than the slight decrease in hospital admissions over the same period.
Why? Here's my proposed explanation: (THREAD)
3/ There are two key facets to this. First, a delay effect. Hospital admission comes maybe 1-2 weeks after symptoms appear. Thus the admissions curve probably peaks a week later than the symptomatic curve, just from this effect.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!