Logical inference about neural networks as models of brain activity and behavior
– a saga in 8 or 9 tweets –
by me, soon to be vastly improved by @o_guest /0
We often reason about what models represent, learn, or ‘know,’ based on performance on a task, or whether the model approximates human behavior/brain activity. Then sometimes we also try to infer what algorithm the human mind and brain instantiates based on this. /1
The arguments roughly go like this: “if the model approximates human behavior/brain data, then it does what people do” (read: it achieved this by doing what people do or having what people have). This appears to be modus ponens. But it isn’t! I’ll get back to that later. /2
Modus ponens: “if the model does what people do, then it will approximate human behavior”. That is good. But if we grant that, why not modus tollens? “if the model does what people do, then it will approximate human behavior; it does not, ergo it didn’t do what people do” /3
We rarely see modus tollens in the literature. Rather, the argument tends to go “the model did not get all the data humans get, that's why it behaved differently.” (solidarity to @GuillermoPuebl6 who dealt w/ this a lot; & see important work by @IrisVanRooij @MarkBlokpoel ) /4
But the same “not-the-same-data-as-humans-get” worry holds for all modus ponens cases. Really it holds for all modelling. 🧨So why is modus ponens accepted as valid, but not modus tollens? /5
Actually what we are doing is affirming the consequent: “if the model approximates human behavior, then it does what humans do” /6
But there are quite literally infinite ways it could produce the same performance… that have nothing to do with what humans do. Thus, I give you the fallacy of AFFIRMING THE CONSEQUENT, and not modus ponens /7
Modus ponens
If models do what humans do, then they will approximate human behavior.

Modus tollens
If models do what humans do, then they will approximate human behavior; but if they do not, then they do not do what humans do. /8
Affirming the consequent
If models approximate human behavior, then they do or have what people do or have.

AKA “modus don’tens,” or the epic “modus trollens” @o_guest /9

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with andrea e. martin

andrea e. martin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!