Last week, the DHS Whistleblower story was swept up in an intense news cycle -- part of a tumultuous whole. Today, I want to share more about that story because it is important on its own.
This story is not about an anonymous whistleblower. It is an allegation that Brian Murphy, Principal Deputy Under Secretary, Department of Homeland Security Office of Intelligence and Analysis, spoke up at least 5 times about illegal activity and was demoted for it.
Brian Murphy has been in public service for more than 20 years. He's a Marine who served in combat duty. He was a Special Agent with the FBI's New York field office on 9/11. He is completing his PhD in Executive Branch responsibilities to combat Russian disinformation.
He spoke up about 5 different situations, each alarming on its own and together painting a disturbing picture. His complaint is detailed and specific. There is no equivocation, ambiguity, or "unnamed sources."
Situation 1: He states that former DHS Sec. Kirstjen Nielsen misled Congress twice by conflating two categories of individuals (known or suspected terrorists & special interest aliens) to inflate risk at the southern border as justification for building a wall.
Murphy submitted two anonymous reports to the Office of the Inspector General about his concerns. He later heard that DHS leaders were demanding his termination because of it.
Situation #2: Upon presenting an intelligence report about conditions in Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador, he was told by Ken Cuccinelli that the report sounded like "deep state intelligence analysts" working to undermine the President.
Cuccinelli demanded that the "deep state" analysts be identified and fired. Murphy consulted with responsible management officials, and no one was fired.
Situation #3: Between March 2018 and August 2020, Murphy witnessed a repeated pattern of censorship and improper administration related to Russian election interference. The theme is suppression of intelligence so as not to embarrass the President.
Murphy consulted with responsible management officials. He was reprimanded, excluded from meetings, and told not disseminate accurate information and instead to focus on China and Iran.
Situation #4: Cuccinelli told Murphy to modify a Homeland Threat Assessment so that it would not reflect poorly on the President. Cuccinelli told Murphy to modify a section on white supremacy to downplay that threat and to include the threat of "violent left wing groups."
Murphy refused to change his analysis, so the assessment was assigned to someone else.
Situation #5: Murphy was instructed to modify intelligence assessments to match Trump's comments on Antifa and "anarchist groups." Murphy refused and was fired under the pretense, he believes, that his department was improperly collecting intelligence information on journalists.
Chad Wolf and Ken Cuccinelli still sit atop the org chart at the Department of Homeland Security, and Murphy's complaint is consistent with activities we are seeing from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence and the Attorney General.
The Trump administration is just that -- not an administration in service of the American people, but an administration in service of the President. Where those interests diverge, as they frequently do here in 2020, the American people receive the raw deal.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
January 6th Committee Hearing 7 - Chairman Thompson is gaveling in
"When I think about the most basic way to explain the importance of elections in the United States, there's a phrase that always comes to mind...we settle our differences at the ballot box." - Rep. Thompson
"When you're on the losing side...you can protest, you can organize, you can get ready for the next election...but you can't turn violent. You can't try to achieve your desired outcome through force or harassment or intimidation." - Rep. Thompson
Jacobson v. Mass is a Supreme Court case from 1905. Massachusetts had a law stating that the board of health or a city or town could “require and enforce the vaccinations and revaccination of all inhabitants thereof.”
The fine for noncompliance was $5. Physicians could certify certain children as “unfit subjects for vaccination.”
Agree with Branden that the language around this has been imprecise. It is a sweeping action, AND testing is an alternative to vaccination. And, there's a lot of other stuff in this plan that isn't getting much coverage:
The administration is using the Defense Production Act to increase the availability of testing. Rapid, at-home tests will be sold at cost for 3 months via Walmart, Amazon, Kroger. The administration is sending 25 million rapid tests fo community health centers and food banks.
The free testing program is expanding to 10,000 pharmacies. Basically, a lot of money and resources are being aimed at expanding the availability, convenience, and discipline around testing (editorial comment: hallelujah. I wish we had done this 2 years ago -b).
Tomorrow on the podcast, my friend Brian (in Sarah's absence-enjoy the vacation, Sarah!) & I briefly discuss the corporate fallout from Georgia's elections legislation. I have a little more I would like to say about this, with help from America's favorite pastime.
I've read so many "is it really voter suppression?" takes over the past few days. I would so much like to exit the Take Economy.
As we've said before, there are elements of this (big ole) bill that are desirable... Like allowing officials to start processing absentee ballots earlier.