When we talk Marxism both yesterday and today, we must be patently clear that those who subscribe to the atheist ideology completely abandon their Jewishness, their Christianity or their Islamic faith. In the Soviet Union, Jewish communists virtually stopped being Jewish.
There is no distinctive Jewish radicalism. There is no Christian radicalization. There is no “Jewish communism’.” Some Jews became communists because of general mechanisms. This is important in understanding the “Sovoks” of today. They are atheists. Leave Judea out of it.
This is the cornerstone in understanding things in terms of how they arose from the wider capitalist material world called “dialectical materialism,” the fundamental underpinning of Marxist philosophy. Antitheism.
Karl Marx, a Jewish-born Hegelian, linked the dialectic to historical materialism and posthumously provided the Bolsheviks with a powerful weapon to overthrow Russian czarism (Orthodox Christianity) and enthrone Soviet communism (atheism) in its place.
Marxism became by far the most important belief system since Christianity. As an ideology, it eventually engulfed over a quarter of the globe. Its relationship to Judaism is complex and highly exploitive. Karl Marx was vehemently against all religion.
In 1843’s “On the Jewish Question,” Marx foresees a communist society in which NEITHER Jew nor Christian would exist. Needless to say, the end result was a thoroughly secular, even atheistic, society, unless Marxism itself could be termed a religion, radicalized atheism.
The question remains, Did Marx see Jewish emancipation as an obstacle to thoroughgoing secularization and to the creation of one “species-being”? link.springer.com/chapter/10.105…
Dialectical materialism was not only developed from German philosophy but from Friedrich Engels in England, and the economic position of rich bourgeoisie, in possession of all the means of production, while the working class who lacked means of production were dependent as labor.
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx gave the British “dark arts” an intellectual home: British cultural Marxism.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nicholas Molodyko

Nicholas Molodyko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @molodyko

17 Sep
The antisemitic environment of interwar Poland was the scene of Europe’s most active and influential Zionist movement. Young Polish Jews were attracted to Zionism because it offered them a way to come to terms with the modern world without surrendering their ethnic identity.
The interrelationships of Polish Zionist organizations and moreover the four Polish Zionist federations political traditions derived from the partitions of Poland provided constituent organizations with the opportunity for interminable ideological and tactical debates.
Should precedence be given to bettering the lives of nearly three million Jews in Poland or to settling a much smaller number of pioneer settlers in Palestine? Was Zionism a secular or a religious movement?
Read 11 tweets
14 Sep
After the 1894 “Dreyfus affair” and alleged widespread anti-Jewish hostility and suspicion in France, journalist Theodore Herzl propagated political Zionist ideas of Israel as the only possible way out of anti-Semitic hate for Jewish people in European countries.
Julien Benda was one of many artists and intellectuals who defended Alfred Dreyfus, a Jewish officer unjustly convicted of treason. The important historical aspect is that intellectuals asserted themselves as a moral force, which is a sick joke that we still live with today.
The Dreyfus Affair first gave the sociology of intellectuals legitimacy as a group with class-like consciousness appearing to be emerging in the first decade of the 20th century.
Read 11 tweets
31 Aug
Israel became a nation in 1948. Before then, it did not exist. It was completely invented, the Zionist enterprise of the British Empire. Though billed as “Jewish,” the people that run Israel are by and large atheist. Would you call an atheist who had been Christian “Christian”?
Important distinction here is that “secular” is a euphemism for atheist. Netanyahu identifies as secular. Many politicians like Golda Meir have had no problem wearing the badge of atheist. Another important distinction is that Jews in the Holocaust were murdered for their faith.
In 1916-17, the UK and the U.S. together committed to create the state of Israel through the Balfour Declaration in London and Wilson’s 14 points in Washington. This was long before Hitler and the Holocaust happened. And, of course, the Bolshevik revolution happened in 1917.
Read 10 tweets
29 Aug
The French Revolution signals the first attempt at state secularism, under a Jacobin government which sought a form of state atheism. This brief experiment was terminated by Napoleon, who saw religion as necessary to govern populations.
In contrast, the Soviet Union placed atheism as central to its project to remake humanity, as manifest in official state policy and the formation of citizen projects with such eyebrow-raising names as “the League of the Militant Godless.”
The Soviets didn’t succeed with the project. It totally bombed. Atheism as a professed ideology is therefore quite young, and there is little historical precedent for reflection on atheistic geopolitics. For most of its short history atheism has been the preserve of a tiny elite.
Read 6 tweets
29 Aug
Neocons have first and foremost exploited religion. They started off as Marxists with the Dems consulting Carter. Then, they moved to the GOP in the 1980s with Reagan co-opting Evangelicals and Mormons, religion and American diplomacy became really toxic. blogs.mediapart.fr/nicholas-molod…
The #NeverTrump Neocons subscribe to the doctrine of militant atheism, which in the beginning was an integral part of the materialism of Marxism—Leninism. They don’t have the courage to publicly voice their true intentions. They are dishonest in every concevable way they can be.
In practical political terms, it is the English School of International Relations. blogs.mediapart.fr/nicholas-molod…
Read 9 tweets
27 Aug
“Cecil Rhodes was a 19th-century European with similar views to those of Karl Marx (a German contemporary). Both believed that black Africans were primitives and that the British empire did a good job in raising ‘barbarian countries.’” spectator.co.uk/article/rhodes…
Writing from the safety of liberal, parliamentary Britain, no writer in the 19th century did more to create intellectual justification for the totalitarian dictatorships of the 20th century than Karl Marx, through his advocacy of the alleged progressive character of dictatorship.
More than any other individual, Cecil Rhodes did in southern Africa what Marx states was done by the British to “lay down the material premises” for the “regeneration” of India. If you read Marx carefully, his criticism, in general, is more of admiration than of scorn.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!