chrislintott Profile picture
Sep 14, 2020 20 tweets 7 min read Read on X
A team led by @jgreaves6 have found what might be signs of life high in Venus' atmosphere. They have detected phospine, a gas which on Earth is produced only by life, in quantities they say are too large to be produced any other way. (1/17)
The discovery was made by using sub-mm (microwave) telescopes @eao_jcmt and @almaobs; phosphine is detected roughly 50km above the surface; parts of the atmosphere have temperature and pressure similar to sea level on Earth (2/17)
The phosphine exists at about 20 parts per billion, which doesn't sound much but which the team's modelling says is ten thousand times more than can be produced by volcanic activity or atmospheric chemistry. Their conclusion - this could be life. (3/17)
Is this real? Firstly, I'm told there has been much skepticism, including from journal referees, about the detection. JCMT and Alma were not made to look at things as bright as Venus and this is a difficult observation. (4/17)
However, we have detections from two seperate telescopes, and the team who led the data reduction - @jgreaves6 and Anita Richards at @UoMPhysics - know JCMT and Alma very well. I'd bet the detection is real. (5/17)
(Side note - @planetarycolin reminded me yesterday that the Russian Vega descent probes found - confusingly - that the lower clouds of Venus had lots of Phosphorus. They didn't test its form, and people assumed it would be phosphoric acid, not phosphine) (6/17)
Is phospine a sign of life? It's only produced by life - in strange places like penguin guts - on Earth, and though its seen in the atmospheres of Jupiter and Saturn there its created by pressure-driven chemistry that can't be happening on Venus. (7/17)
The team - particularly William Bains, along with Helen Fraser at the OU and others - have built a model that tries to keep track of the many chemical reactions that might produce phospine. They can't get it to account for what's seen. (8/17)
The details of that model are in a second paper which has not yet been accepted by the journal, and it will be heavily scrutinised when it comes out! There are two possibilities. Either the team have missed something obvious or made a mistake... (9/17)
..Or studying the chemistry of Venus' atmosphere just became a very hot topic. Reactions in a sulphuric acid rich environment are, I suspect, not well understood. It will be fascinating to watch what happens. My bet is on chemistry (#itsneveraliens) but who knows! (10/17)
(Worth noting that my go-to expert on solar system chemistry @PlanetDr is highly skeptical, and posted this earlier, which is wise: ) (11/17)
@PlanetDr If it is life, it must be very unusual life. There are microorganisms adapted to very acidic environments on Earth, but nothing like this. There are also ideas about how a life cycle could work, published by @profsaraseager's team: discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/h… (12/17)
@PlanetDr @ProfSaraSeager If it is life, then the prospects of life being widespread in the cosmos increases rapidly. If life can evolve and survive on Venus, I suspect we should expect it in a much wider range of environments than previously thought. (13/17)
So what's next? I'm sure there will be repeated observations. Understanding if the detection is real, and whether the amount of phospine changes with time will be crucial. (14/17)
What about spacecraft? None of the planned orbiters will have instruments which will help. Proposed entry probes (American DAVINCI+, Russian Venera-D) will measure the composition but will plunge through the atmopshere fast. (15/17)
What's needed is something like the proposed Venus Flagship Mission which would have a balloon floating in the atmosphere, capable of looking for biomolecules. Balloning on Venus (though probably in the 2030s)! vfm.jpl.nasa.gov (16/17).
So there's much work to do to understand what this result means, but it's fascinating. If you're in the UK, you can hear the full story from @jgreaves6 and her team on #skyatnight, BBC4, 10.30pm tonight (17/17)
@jgreaves6 One final thing - I've been trying to think how this compares to other moments. I think what's different here is that the team went looking for phospine in order to search for life - and found it. That's a remarkable result whichever way you look at it (18/17)
@jgreaves6 (A certain vintage of British astronomer will be pleased to know that one version of the story of how this discovery came about features conversations in Uncle Billy's in Hilo). (19/17)
@jgreaves6 I'm looking forward to the flood of people with theories about making phosphine - mine is chemistry kicked off by high energy particles from the solar wind, which can penetrate into the dense Venusian atmosphere.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with chrislintott

chrislintott Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chrislintott

Feb 8
I have a new paper out today, led by Matthew Hopkins & @astrokiwi, predicting the properties of interstellar objects - visitors from other Solar Systems which pass through our own. The paper has all the detail, but let me explain a little here. . (1/n)arxiv.org/abs/2402.04904
We've seen 2 interstellar objects so far - 'Oumuamua which surprised us all in 2017, and Borisov two years later. For a summary of what we know & why these things matter, there's my @greshamcollege lecture, now on Youtube: (2/n)
@GreshamCollege TLDW: objects like these - tens of meters across, floating between the stars - are the most common macroscopic objects in the galaxy. Our solar system maybe donated 10^16 to the population, and they may play an important role in planet formation (3/n)
Read 23 tweets
Sep 6, 2023
Anyone want to hear an amazing story that came up during the talks to celebrate the 80th birthday of Jocelyn Bell Burnell @oxfordphysics yesterday? (1/n)
Jocelyn, of course, is the discoverer of pulsars, and the most famous pulsar is that which lives at the heart of the Crab Nebula, the remnant of a supernova that exploded nearly a millennium ago (2/n)
(The name pulsar, short for pulsating radio source, describes their often very rapid blinking. I hadn’t realised the name had been coined by a Daily Telegraph reporter who thought the scientists’ name for these things was too long) (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
Jun 29, 2023
Results just released from @NANOGrav and international partners show - for the first time - the signature of long-wavelength gravitational waves rippling through space. (1/n)
@NANOGrav These waves, which buffet the Earth, are believed to most likely be the result of the mergers of supermassive black holes at the centres of galaxies (2/n)
@NANOGrav We've detected gravitational waves before, from @LIGO and friends, but those are at much shorter wavelengths, the results of the collision of black holes a few times the mass of the Sun. What @NANOGrav and friends have found - if real - is on a much larger scale (3/n)
Read 22 tweets
Aug 23, 2022
This story from @nasa is causing confusion- black holes don’t make sounds! So what’s actually happening?
This is an image of a cluster of galaxies in the constellation of Perseus, viewed with a telescope (@NASAChandra) that picks up light from hot gas. We’re seeing gas that fills the whole cluster, between the galaxies.
There are ripples in the gas, spreading out from the centre like the waves you get when you drop a duck in a pond. If you like, you can say these ripples are ‘sound’ and work out what note they are. That note, shifted up so we can hear it, and played with, is NASA’s sound.
Read 9 tweets
Jul 20, 2022
A couple of further comments on the paper out earlier with the tentative identification of very distant galaxies in early #JWST data (1/n)
Firstly, the paper's not reviewed yet, so take appropriate pinches of salt, though what's done looks sensible to me. (The team themselves note the dangers of working with a new instrument they may not fully understand yet). (2/n)
The gold standard would be to look at features in the spectra of these systems that confirm their distance - that hasn't been done yet. Instead, the pattern of how bright the system appears in different colours matches what we'd expect for very distant systems (3/n)
Read 7 tweets
Jul 13, 2022
For all the excitement about the images yesterday, I hope someone at the agency is rethinking how they present such things. Yesterday’s #jwst release was painful, despite the best efforts of some fabulous communicators. (1/n)
Firstly, I think there’s a tendency to be over ambitious. A live show, crossing to many different locations, and incorporating numerous live elements is tough, especially if you haven’t done it many times before. (2/n)
Industry people I know reckon that cost should have been > $750000. I’m pretty sure @nasa didn’t spend that, but doing it on (much) less risks disaster. (3/n)
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(